Page 59 - SFG_ANNUALREPORT_12OCT_SINGLEPAGE
P. 59
Remuneration report (audited) Alignment to shareholders’ interests:
The remuneration report, which has been audited, • has economic profit as a core component of plan
outlines the key management personnel remuneration design;
arrangements for the consolidated entity, in accordance • focuses on sustained growth in shareholder wealth,
with the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and
consisting of dividends and share price growth, and
its Regulations.
delivering constant or increasing return on assets as
Key management personnel are those persons having well as focusing the executive on key non-financial
authority and responsibility for planning, directing and drivers of value; and
controlling the activities of the entity, directly or indirectly,
• attracts and retains high calibre executives.
including all directors.
The remuneration report is set out under the following Alignment to program participants’ interests:
main headings:
• rewards capability and experience;
1. Principles used to determine the nature and amount • reflects competitive reward for contribution to growth
of remuneration
in shareholder wealth; and
2. Details of remuneration • provides a clear structure for earning rewards.
3. Service agreements
4. Share-based compensation In accordance with best practice corporate governance,
5. Additional information the structures of non-executive directors and executive
remuneration are separate.
1. Principles used to determine the Non-executive directors’ remuneration
nature and amount of remuneration Fees and payments to non-executive directors reflect
the demands which are made on, and the responsibilities
The objective of the consolidated entity’s executive of, these directors. Non-executive directors’ fees and
reward framework is to ensure reward for performance payments are reviewed annually by the Nomination
is competitive and appropriate for the results delivered. and Remuneration Committee. The Nomination and
The framework aligns executive reward with the Remuneration Committee may, from time to time, receive
achievement of strategic objectives, the creation of advice from independent remuneration consultants to
value for shareholders, and conforms to the market best ensure non-executive directors’ fees and payments are
practice for delivery of reward. The Board of Directors appropriate and in line with the market. The chairperson’s
(‘the Board’) ensures that executive reward satisfies fees are determined independently to the fees of other
the following key criteria for good reward non-executive directors, and are based on comparable
governance practices: roles in the external market. The chairperson is not
present at any discussions relating to determination of
• competitiveness and reasonableness; his own remuneration. Non-executive directors do not
receive share options or other incentives.
• acceptability to the Group’s strategic and business
objectives and the creation of shareholder value; ASX listing rules require the aggregate non-executive
directors remuneration be determined periodically by
• performance linkage/alignment of executive a general meeting. The most recent determination was
compensation; at the Annual General Meeting held on 8 November
2012, where the shareholders approved an aggregate
• transparency; and remuneration of $600,000. The current base fees were
last reviewed with effect from 1 January 2012.
• acceptability to shareholders.
Executive remuneration
The Nomination and Remuneration Committee is The consolidated entity aims to reward executives with
responsible for determining and reviewing remuneration a level and mix of remuneration based on their position
arrangements for its directors and executives. The and responsibility, which has both fixed and variable
performance of the consolidated entity depends on the components.
quality of its directors and executives. The remuneration
philosophy is to attract, motivate and retain high The Board ensures that executive reward satisfies the
performance and high quality personnel. following key criteria for good reward governance
practices:
In consultation with external remuneration consultants
(refer to the section ‘use of remuneration consultants’ • competitiveness and reasonableness;
below), the Nomination and Remuneration Committee
has structured an executive remuneration framework that • alignment to the Group’s strategic and business
is market competitive and complementary to the reward objectives and the creation of shareholder value;
strategy of the consolidated entity.
058

