Page 32 - NCJA Journal_volume1_issue1-final
P. 32

(but without due process) intervene with lower-level offenders whose petitions would have been


              dismissed and unintentionally involve more youth in the system (Bates & Swan, 2018; Béchard,

              Ireland, Berg, & Vogel, 2011; Mears et al., 2016).  As Mears et al. (2016) write, “Net-widening

              traditionally has been viewed as arising when the juvenile court, through diversion programs,


              expands its reach” (p. 966).  If the police do not divert children that they would typically ignore,

              then no net-widening occurs.  But if there are vendors or programs with a vested interest in


              promoting diversion, the juvenile justice net may in fact ‘catch’ more youth than intended (net-

              widening.)  The number of diversions alone does not serve as an indicator of successful diversion.


              After controlling for factors that impact officers’ decisions to arrest or divert, the data should

              demonstrate that youth charges are decreasing rather than remaining constant or increasing


              (Greene, 2011).  A number of precautions can reduce the risk of net-widening, including informing

              officers regarding their discretionary role in referrals to diversion programs; ensuring diversion


              programs are not used to fill the role of non-justice-related, community-based social service

              agencies; mandating a strict eligibility criteria to ensure youth are appropriately routed into

              diversion programs; and adequately assessing the number of charges/youth under jurisdiction


              administration.  Finally, one significant reason that attention must also be paid to the role that

              discretion plays in potential net-widening is that this discretion often compounds racial and ethnic


              disparities.


                      Thus, with all community-based programming, special precautions should be made to


              ensure that the benefits are made equitably to the youth of all races and ethnicities.  Part of the

              collaboration for the YDP includes a partnership with Race Matters for Juvenile Justice which uses


              institutional organizing, education, and workforce development (including race analysis and

              implicit bias training) to reduce disproportionality and disparate outcomes for youth and families of

              color (www.rmjj.org).  Given the current level of racial and ethnic disproportionality and



                                                                                                            25
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37