Page 264 - History of The Quranic Text | Kalamullah.Com
P. 264

244           THE HISTORY OF THE QUR'A:'-lIC TEXT

                                  certain aberrations in old fragments, it is not at all unusual to find th
                                  contemporary author invoking homoioteleuton (for example) to dispe
                                  any notion that the error was deliberate on the scribe's part; this may be
                                  proffered as a potential explanation even if the same omission is present
                                  in other important manuscripts."



                                           v. No Qualms Felt in Altering the Text when there
                                             Appeared to be Adequate Doctrinal Reasons

                                  We should be more concerned with intentional alterations however, as
                                  they are naturally far more serious. Until the Middle Ages the text of the
                                  OT was not yet established," and "before the text of the Old Testament
                                  was officially established, it was not regarded as unalterable". 75Therefore
                                  the scribes and transmitters would occasionally make deliberate alterations
                                  which, regardless of their intentions, served in a very real sense to corrupt
                                  the original text. Parallel manuscripts demonstrate that not even the Mas-
                                  oretic text, intended to safeguard the OT [rom further changes, was immune
                                  to this phenomenon."

                                      Yet the restoration of the early traditional text, reconstructing and
                                      preservingit even where it was open to criticism, is only one of the
                                      marksof (rabbinic) occupationwith the [Masoretic] text.A second mark
                                      reveals an opposite tendency. There is clear evidence thatno qualms were filt in
                                      altering the textwhen there appeared to be adequate doctrinal reasons. 77

                                    What were some of these pressing doctrinal reasons? Occasionally they
                                  were merely linguistic,changing an esoteric word into a more common one.
                                  Other times they involved the removal of religiously offensive wording, or
                                  (most serious of all)the insertion of certain words to champion one possible
                                  interpretation of a verse over all others.78Jewish tradition preserved a partial
                                  record of these textual alterations in notes known as the Tiqqune sopherim and
                                  the Itture sopherim,79 which must of course be relatively late works.



                                   73 SeeWurthwein, p. 154.
                                   74 Seethis work p. 246.
                                   75 Wurthwein, p. Ill.
                                   76 ibid, p. Ill.
                                   77 ibid, p. 17. Italics added.
                                   78 ibid, pp. 111-112.
                                   79 ibid, p. 17.
   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269