Page 153 - test2
P. 153

dependent on the findings of the major survey.  During JIT hearings, Fry was
                   asked about the confusion surrounding the verification of the 1,825‐day major
                   overhaul start date and how the Panel could determine when the Deepwater
                   Horizon’s BOP stack components were installed.  Fry responded:

                          Ram blocks, recertification of ram blocks ‐ I mean, a ram block that gets
                          inspected gets inspected for damage.  It gets a hardness check.  It gets a
                          non‐destructive testing inspection done on it.  If thereʹs no damage to it,
                          again, thereʹs no requirement for a mandatory recertification of it.
                          Normally, to kind of expand on your question, the start date is from the
                                            366
                          date of the COC.

                          A certificate of conformity or certificate of compliance (“COC”) was
                   issued by the OEM.  The Panel could not locate any Cameron COC for the VBR
                   bonnets since the installation date in 2000.  Transocean also submitted
                   documentation stating the VBR ram blocks had not been completely overhauled
                   since installation in 2000.
                                              367

                          The Panel also never received documentation on the required 1,825‐day
                   inspection, which should have been done in 2005 for the VBR bonnets.
                   According to Transocean’s subsea items scheduled to be worked on during the
                   2011 shipyard visit, they were scheduled to “replace or rebuild all 6 bonnets on
                   pipe rams.”
                                368

                                   3.    “Condition Based” Monitoring and Maintenance

                          In testimony, Transocean personnel articulated an approach to BOP stack
                   maintenance that they referred to as “condition based monitoring” or “condition
                   based maintenance.”  Transocean subsea superintendant, William Stringfellow,
                   described this approach as follows:

                          Again, we use condition‐based monitoring, and we look at [API] RP 53 as
                          a recommended practice.  Using our condition‐based monitoring and
                          testing of our systems, we can determine what kind of condition those
                          BOPs are actually in.  And we have history to back this up through –
                          we’ve actually pulled BOPs down within this time frame and there not be


                   366  Fry testimony at 46.
                   367  TRN‐USCG_MMS‐00097144.
                   368  TRN‐USCG_MMS‐00096390.


                                                            148
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158