Page 149 - test2
P. 149

DNV discounted this theory for a number of reasons.  First, under this
                   theory, someone on the bridge would have had to activate the BSR normal close
                   function from the toolpusher’s control panel or the driller’s control panel.  DNV
                   concluded that no witness testimony supported this.  Second, DNV pointed to
                   the testimony of Chris Pleasant, the Transocean subsea engineer, who testified
                   that the BSR was in an “open” state when he arrived at the bridge at
                   approximately 9:56 p.m.  This was further evidence that no one had activated the
                   “close” function.

                          The second theory advanced was referred to as the “double clutch”
                   theory, which posited that the solenoid of the ROV supplied just enough
                   pressure to the hydraulic port on the BOP to cause the BSR to go only partially
                                      356
                   into the wellbore.   The Cameron representative described this as follows:

                          Also, there were at least a handful of cases during the course of the
                          intervention in which the shear rams were double clutched.  In other
                          words, pressure was applied to the BOP and then it was relieved.  It was
                          applied and relieved.  There were at least a handful of times in which that
                                         357
                          happened. . .

                          DNV concluded that “[t]he overall contribution of this ‘double clutching’
                   phenomenon cannot in DNV’s opinion be of significance compared to the
                   contribution of the trapped pipe between the ram blocks.”
                                                                                 358

                              J.     Studies Evaluating the Reliability of BOPs

                          Within the last decade, MMS, through its Technology Assessment and
                   Research Program (“TA&R”), funded or co‐funded various studies regarding the
                   reliability of BOP systems in deepwater applications, shear ram capabilities, and
                   the evaluation of secondary intervention methods in well control.   Some of
                                                                                         359
                   these studies pointed out deficiencies in BOP systems and made suggestions to
                   change MMS regulations and/or industry standards.




                   356  The ROV has a robotic arm that fits into a hydraulic port on the BOP stack to pump hydraulic
                   fluid into the BOP to close the ram blocks.
                   357  McWhorter testimony at 145.
                   358  Addendum to the DNV Report, at 10.
                   359  The TA&R Program supports research associated with operational safety, pollution prevention
                   and oil spill response and clean up activities.


                                                            144
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154