Page 24 - 綜合新聞560期04-18-2020
P. 24

04-18-2020
            Compact News / 綜合新聞
            Compact News / 綜合新聞                                    04-18-2020
                                            China’s Ability in Dealing with Pandemic                              Dr. Wordman






            A recent article written by Prof. Robert Peckham,   outcry of China and Chinese people being sadly   “Beijing’s SARS Attack” which “catalyzed a policy
            an author of the book, Epidemics in Modern Chi-  bullied by the Western Powers (especially 1890’s).   U-turn in China”... “The mayor of Beijing and the
            na, and a MB Lee Professor in the Humanities and   The intellectuals in China during the late 19th and   minister of public health resigned, and the govern-
            Medicine at the University of Hong Kong (HKU), has   early 20th century used sick man and sick nation   ment embarked on a concerted and much-publi-
            caught my attention. His article is entitled, Past   to shame themselves and to motivate their fellow   cized campaign to contain the epidemic.”
            Pandemics Exposed China’s Weakness - The cur-  countrymen to reform, to revolt and to rebuild Chi-
            rent one highlights its strength, appeared in For-  na. When the world is now facing the challenge of   China successfully contained SARS. In Peckham’s
            eign Affairs (3-27-2020). As a director and founder   COVID-19 together, such derogatory article in WSJ   view, China has learned a good lesson from SARS
            of the multi-disciplinary Center for the Humanities   is not a display of freedom of speech but a shame-  that is used in the COVID-19 pandemic; XI’s cam-
            and Medicine (CHM), he oversees a programme of   ful discrimination. Peckham clearly has a purpose   paign in fighting the Coronavirus is strikingly sim-
            research involving a wide range of disciplines net-  of citing the WSJ article. He went on to say that the   ilar to what was used against SARS. The Chinese
            worked to national and international institutions.   rapid  politicization  of  the  new  coronavirus,  and   government successfully marshaled tens of thou-
            Also as a professor in the Department of History, his   particularly of China’s role in containing it, has his-  sands of health-care workers and military person-
            research focuses on histories of infectious disease,   torical precedents.            nel to support Wuhan where the Coronavirus first
            epidemics, and global pandemic threats. Prof.                                         broke out. Xi described the pandemic as a “total
            Peckham’s article comes as a timely dissertation   Peckham then reviewed the impact of plague,   war”  taking  stringent  measures  of  closing  down
            on an important topic - management of pandem-  both bubonic and pneumonic types, in China and   the 14 million residents city and applying nation-
            ic. However, the article seemed to be tailored for   how they were managed by Chinese ‘authorities’.   wide testing and quarantine practice. Now, China
            Foreign Affairs’ political agenda, the discussion is   Extending to China’s Republic Period (1911-1949)   has contained  the pandemic  with zero new  case
            miles high in the political cloud than on the ground   and the People’s Republic of China (1949-1970),   occurring; the city Wuhan is now open to visitors
            of pandemic disease management (rather disap-  Professor Peckham made glossary linkage of dis-  and  the  industries  are  gradually  returning  to  pre-
            pointing).                                 ease control and China’s political environment.   COVID-19 operations. China has essentially won
                                                       This glossary discussion was unfortunately lack of   the COVID-19 pandemic war. Peckham reiterated
            Pandemic management is such an important topic;   facts and clear evidence on either the weak dis-  media’s speculation of “the scenario of leaked in-
            it deserves serious discussion, especially when the   ease management or the complex political struc-  formation, cover-up and crackdown” repeated in
            entire  world  is  facing the  challenge of  COVID-19.   ture during that period of time. It is a good topic   COVID-19  pandemic.  Personally,  I  would  not  give
            Hence, I hope Peckham’s article will stimulate dis-  for PhD research but it may be too difficult to find   much value to that kind of story. In the very begin-
            cussion on China’s weakness and strength in pan-  detailed citizen’s healthcare information from that   ning of a disease, before knowing whether or not
            demic management from the past to present. First,   period  of  China.  Hence  one  can  not  take  Peck-  it is pandemic, the information management is in
            I agree with his point on not politicizing pandemic   ham’s remarks seriously, for example, on relating   a gray area between privacy and public concern
            and his conclusion on government efficiency, but   disease management to Mao’s cultural revolution   and between causing panic and reaching only to
            his political arguments on relating weakness in dis-  or  claiming  that  “disease  had  revealed  China’s   the right professionals to make critical decisions. In
            ease management  to government  structure (Chi-  political system for what it was and in need of fun-  Wuhan’s case, the delay was short and measures
            na) was based on little concrete evidence. China   damental reform”. The revolution and political re-  were swift, the success of containing the pandem-
            was very weak in 19th and early 20th century in her   form was far more motivated by the ‘sick man feel-  ic speaks for itself.
            governance (diplomacy, defense, industrializa-  ing’ caused by interference and invasion from the
            tion,  etc.)  due  to  poor  leadership  (emperor)  and   foreign powers striping Chinese people’s dignity   Peckham’s conclusion states that China has shared
            foreign powers’ interference and control, there-  than from the plague or any other disease.  its expertise with the European Union, (I may add,
            fore, China’s healthcare was weak as well. Peck-                                      Trump said he had learned a lot from Xi in their one
            ham reviewed pandemic history from plague, to   Peckham’s idea that the Chinese Communist Party   hour phone discussion) and pledged $20 million
            HIV/AIDS, to SARS and COVID-19 but he had no fac-  (CCP) looks at pandemic from a statisticians  lens   to WHO in its fight against the virus, dispatched
            tual case discussion for China other than blaming   is an important topic worthy discussion but he did   medical teams and supplies to Iran, Iraq, Italy, UK
            her  for  lack  of  political  and  economic  openness.   not elaborate. His remark that the disease justi-  and Serbia, and promised to help African coun-
            China was shut out of global fair interaction and   fies one party rule had no clear arguments. He   tries meet the crisis.(China donated ventilators to
            forced into isolation in most part of that history.   credited Mao’s ‘barefoot doctor’ and community   NY State). Xi has begun to look more like a glob-
            As a historian, Peckham’s view is too simplistic in   healthcare program, a vision of from-the-ground-  al leader committed to health for all, while the
            painting  China  being  weak  and  opaque  in  pan-  up healthcare, “helped inspire a global shift: in   Western states appear to be improvising with dif-
            demic management for that period of time.  1978, …. the WHO International Conference on   ficulties. Perhaps for the readers of Foreign Affairs,
                                                       Primary Health Care adopted the Declaration of   Peckham draws attention of strongman leadership
            Professor Peckham first quoted Bruce Aylward, who   Alma-Ata, which upheld health as a basic human   versus incompetency within the democracies in
            led the joint mission of WHO with China on fight-  right and emphasized community-based health   dealing with the pandemic. Although, I agree with
            ing COVID-19, in praising China: “probably the   care for all”. In China’s open and reform period,   Peckham’s implication that an authoritarian gov-
            most ambitious, and I would say, agile and ag-  healthcare was a number one priority that offered   ernment is more efficient in handling the pandem-
            gressive disease-containment effort in history.” In   China a strong base for handling HIV/AIDS and   ic, but in my opinion, learning from experience is
            contrast, Peckham cited the infamous Wall Street   SARS pandemic. Peckham hinted that there was a   extremely important. China learned well from SARS
            Journal article entitled, “China is the sick man   pattern in China’s pandemic management having   that helped contain COVID19 pandemic. Now the
            of Asia” which the Secretary of State, Mike Pom-  leaked information, cover-ups, and crackdowns.   world should be humble to learn from China to
            peo, made an improper defense of it as free press.   He cited journalist Susan Jakes’ searing exposé   deal with the pandemic.
            Peckham gave a historical origin of “China as a   in Time magazine, based on a signed statement
            sick man” coming from Chinese patriotic scholars’   by a whistle-blower Dr. Jiang, under the headline,
             l  24  l CompactNews
            l 24 l CompactNews
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29