Page 333 - (DK) The Business Book
P. 333

DELIVERING THE GOODS         331

        See also: Study the competition 24–27   ■  Keep evolving business practice 48–51   ■  Avoid groupthink 114   ■  Ignoring
        the herd 146–49   ■  Avoiding complacency 194–201   ■  Simplify processes 296–99   ■  Applying and testing ideas 310–11


        businesses. Improvements can come                                 production methods. Upon their
        quickly so that once the process                                  return, the team members adopted
        of benchmarking has identified                                     many of the production methods
        effective practices, these methods                                they had seen. Benchmarking
        can be adopted. The changes should                                also enabled Xerox to improve
        lift performance to the level achieved   Benchmarking provides    the reliability of its products. From
        by the industry leader, so that any   an inventory of creative    1981 to 1990, customer complaints
        competitiveness gap is eliminated      changes that other         fell by 60 percent. Over the same
        quickly. In the future, benchmarking   companies have enacted.    period Xerox’s manufacturing
        can be repeated on a regular basis.     John Langley              costs fell by more than 50 percent,
                                             UK Barclays Bank executive   which enabled the company to
        Benchmarking in practice                                          match the prices charged by the
        In the 1980s, the US photocopier                                  Japanese, while maintaining its
        manufacturer Xerox used                                           profit margins.
        benchmarking to restore its market
        share. For ten years, it had been                                 Raising standards
        losing customers to its Japanese                                  Governments have also used
        rivals Canon and Ricoh. These    simplicity enabled the competition   benchmarking to improve
        companies had been gaining       to benefit from economies of scale;   performance. For example, from
        ground because they were able to   bulk-buying components reduced   2000 to 2009, the Organization
        undercut the prices charged by   operating costs, making it possible   for Economic Cooperation and
        Xerox, without compromising on   for Canon and Ricoh to offer     Development (OECD) surveyed
        product quality. To identify what   consumers lower prices. Xerox   education standards in 65 countries
        they were doing wrong, Xerox     responded by simplifying its     and identified that Finland
        bought their rivals’ products and   designs, so that the commonality    achieved the highest rankings in
        took them apart. They discovered   of components across Xerox models   reading, mathematics, and science.
        that Canon and Ricoh designed their   rose from 20 to 70 percent.   Teachers from around the world
        machines so that they were made     Xerox’s US management team    now visit Finland every year to
        from a relatively small number of   also visited Japanese photocopier   learn more about the Finnish
        common components. Design        factories to learn more about their   educational success. ■

                                         Benchmarking across industries

                                         Some companies learn from        specialized in one task, which
                                         another organization that operates  they practiced over and over,
                                         in a completely different market.   until it was perfect.
                                         For example, in 2005, two doctors   Goldman and Elliot changed
                                         from London’s Great Ormond       working arrangements at Great
                                         Street children’s hospital were   Ormond Street by applying
                                         struck by the efficiency of the   Ferrari best practice: clear job
                                         Ferrari pit crew during a Formula   descriptions meant that each
                                         1 race.                          member of staff knew what
                                            Alan Goldman and Martin       their role was, and a leadership
                                         Elliot observed that only one    position was assigned for each
          Ferrari’s pit-stop crew has a clear   person in the crew gave orders,   shift. As a result, patient
          chain of command, allowing them to   avoiding time lost in discussion,   handover errors between the
          refuel the car and change all four   and pit-stop routines were   operating room and intensive
          tires in less than seven seconds.   standardized. Crew members   care unit unit fell by 70 percent.
   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338