Page 14 - EPREP book
P. 14

crucial to inform decision makers regarding increase number of PrEP users coverage under UHC

               as well as improvement of PrEP service delivery in Thailand.


               Methodology

               This M&E is a mixed methods study consisting of three parts:
               1.  Secondary data analysis of consecutive PrEP clients from the National AIDs Program (NAP

                   PLUS) under NHSO for the fiscal year 2020 during the period from 1 October 2019 to 30
                   September 2020 to capture PrEP cascades, and analyze on Thailand PrEP uptake and

                   retention.
               2.  A study on PrEP service providers entailing 2 components which are 1.) A self-administered

                   questionnaire to examine PrEP service providers’ knowledge of and attitudes towards PrEP

                   service and 2.) A focus group interview using semi-structure questionnaire to capture
                   barriers  of  PrEP  initiation  and  retentions,  differences,  advantages,  and  disadvantages

                   between 3 PrEP service delivery models, issues, and recommendations concerning PrEP

                   services.
               3.  A study on PrEP clients consisting of 2 parts which are:

                          Part 1. A self-administered questionnaire through online survey to understand the
                   demographic characteristics, assess risk behaviors, factors affecting clients' decision to

                   initiate, continue or stop oral PrEP, experiences, adverse events of PrEP use, and risk
                   compensation among key populations in which PrEP clients from hospital-based setting

                   and KPLHS were categorized into the following 6 groups

                          1.1 New PrEP users who recently initiated PrEP
                          1.2 New PrEP users who had been offered PrEP but did not initiate PrEP

                          2.  Individuals who had previously discontinued PrEP and restarted PrEP again
                          3.  PrEP users who have been staying on PrEP from 1 month onwards

                          4.  PrEP users who discontinued PrEP at clinic

                          5.  PrEP users who discontinued PrEP for at least one month and did not come
                              back to PrEP service center


                   Part  2.  Individual  in-depth  interviews  using  semi-structured  questionnaires  to  identify

                   factors affecting the decision to initiate PrEP, experiences of PrEP use, challenges, and

                   recommendations  on  PrEP  service  delivery.  PrEP  clients  were  categorized  into  the
                   following 4 groups:





                [xi] รายงานการประเมินผล
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19