Page 265 - EPREP book
P. 265
11. Vanhamel J, Rotsaert A, Reyniers T, Nöstlinger C, Laga M, Van Landeghem E, et al.
The current landscape of pre-exposure prophylaxis service delivery models for HIV
prevention: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):704.
12. Ramautarsing R, Doi Nakpor T. Differentiated HIV Service Delivery through Key
Population-Led Health Services for men who have sex with men and transgender
women, Thailand: Differentiated Care; [cited 2020 27 April]. Available from:
http://www.differentiatedcare.org/Portals/0/adam/Content/CCgFbDgPhkSIiDmJlg-
iIA/File/TRC%20SISTERS%20Thailand.pdf.
13. (HITAP) HITAP. Economic evaluation of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis. Health
Intervention Technology Assessment Programme (HITAP), 2019.
14. Allen ST, O’Rourke A, White RH, et al. Barriers and Facilitators to PrEP Use Among
People Who Inject Drugs in Rural Appalachia: A Qualitative Study. AIDS Behav.
2020;24(6):1942-195
15. Institute of HIV Research and Innovation (IHRI). แผนผังการให้บริการ PrEP ในศูนย์สุขภาพ
ชุมชน (CBOs).
16. Creating Alternative Demand for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP). The 2 Asia-Pacific
nd
Regional Consultation on PrEP Implementation; 2018; Bangkok, Thailand: Creating
Alternative Demand.
[202] เอกสารอ้างอง
ิ
