Page 36 - ATR 1 2014 web
P. 36

SCORES,
              Continued from page 22



              the scores are based on a rolling,
              24-month period, a good inspection can   “if You’re makiNg strides aNd improViNg Your
              fall off a carrier’s scorecard, drastically   performaNce, sometimes You doN’t alwaYs
              affecting its percentile ranking even   get that credit publiclY. it’s somethiNg that
              though the carrier has done nothing to
              become less safe.                      shippers reallY haVe to dig for, aNd quite
                 “I just did some analysis,” Pohlen    hoNestlY, most that are lookiNg at this
              said, “and what you’ll find is smaller   sYstem to make busiNess decisioNs, are oNlY
              carriers almost across the board have
              higher scores than the larger carri-   seeiNg the perceNtile raNkiNg, aNd theY’Ve
              ers because once they get a percentile   kiNd of beeN coNditioNed to look at that
              score, it’s very hard for them to wash     raNkiNg aNd make a quick judgmeNt.”
              that out because they don’t get lots of
              inspections. A small carrier’s got to get                   —jasoN wiNg,
              inspected several times. They almost
              have to be seeking out inspection sta-    maNager of safetY aNd compliaNce traiNiNg,
              tions to get that percentile score to drop             abf freight sYstem, iNc.
              again.”
                 The FMCSA’s Ruban said opportu-
              nities for inspection vary and are not
              necessarily dependent on size. A small
              operator carrying hazardous materials   understands the industry’s concern.   Department of Transportation’s John A.
              in the Northeast, for example, may be   Currently, crash reports sent by states to   Volpe National Transportation Systems
              inspected often.                   the FMCSA do not record the carrier’s   Center found support for the Safety
                 Wing said large carriers like ABF   role in the accident. Ruban said FMCSA   Measurement System’s effectiveness.
              can be treated unfairly, too. Failure to   takes crashes into account because past   That study analyzed carrier safety data
              land in a high enough percentile in a   crashes are a predictor of future crashes,   over a two-year period before the sys-
              particular BASIC can flag a carrier as   regardless of who originally was at fault.   tem was created and then studied safety
              being in alert status. A carrier may have   The agency currently is conducting a   records over an ensuing 18-month peri-
              improved in its performance but could   crash weighting study that will consider   od. The carriers it would have identified
              still slip in its ranking because other   whether or not to change that BASIC.   as needing enforcement interventions
              carriers improve as well. Also, the incre-  FMCSA also is considering revis-  went on to have crash rates that were
              ments separating carriers can be very   ing its methodologies so that the Safety   more than double the national average.
              small.                             Measurement System would be used to   ABF’s Wing agreed that CSA is an
                 “I liken it to having a class full of   make a safety fitness determination.   improvement over SafeStat and said
              Rhodes Scholars, and applying the CSA   According to the agency, only about   FMCSA has been open to the carrier
              criteria, you’re going to flunk out 20 to   12,000 carriers receive a safety fitness   industry’s concerns. He said CSA has
              40 percent of that class,” he said.  determination each year. The agency   made a difference in the way carriers
                 A constant source of irritation   says it is considering several options. It   are doing business. For example, carriers
              since CSA was created has been the   hopes to publish its notice of proposed   are more careful about the drivers they
              lack of assignment of responsibility for   rulemaking by May 2014.    hire because they know a driver’s per-
              accidents in the crash indicator BASIC.   Regardless of its problems and   formance will reflect on the company’s
              Currently FMCSA makes no distinc-  strengths, CSA is here to stay. Ruban   scores.
              tion between an accident where the   said that Safety Measurement System   “It’s gotten carriers’ attention –
              motor carrier driver was at fault and   is an improvement over the FMCSA’s   good, bad or indifferent,” he said. “I
              one where he or she was an innocent   previous enforcement tool, Safestat,   think carriers on the whole are taking
              victim.                            and that it is helping the agency better   a closer look at what they’re doing and
                 The crash BASIC isn’t available for   identify and collect data while helping   how safe they are and are taking action
              public viewing. However, the FMCSA’s   the motor carrier industry utilize that   to reduce violations at the roadside.”
              Ruban acknowledged that the agency   data. A study released in January by the

        36                                                                            arKansas trucKing report | issue 1 2014
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41