Page 153 - English for Writing Research Papers
P. 153

135

                The OV is extremely confusing, even though the use of the English language is
            perfect.

                 (1)      were made  indicates that this is Wordsworth’s work, but when the reader
                 reaches the end of the sentence he/she sees a reference to another paper. Does
                 this reference just refer to the second part of the sentence (beginning  because
                 politicians ) or does it refer to the  measurements , or both? The reader cannot
                 be sure. Moreover, authors who quote from their own previous work, as
                 Wordsworth does here, should alert the reader that it is their work and not
                 someone else’s. The problem is that readers may not remember the name of
                 the author of the paper they are reading, so even if they see Wordsworth in the
                 reference they may not realize that he is the author of the current paper.
                (2)      similar tests  by who? (Wordsworth or someone else?) and when? (in
                 Wordsworth’s 2008 paper or his current paper?)
               (3–5)     Again, the reader has no idea who conducted the tests and when, or whether
                 they refer to the current research or Wordsworth’s previous research.

                 (6)   Who is making this conclusion? Is it Wordsworth based on his research in

                 this paper? Or is it a general conclusion made by other authors and already
                 reported in the literature?
             As usual, the problem is due to the fact that Wordsworth knows who did what, and
            he assumes that the reader also knows this vital information.

              The RV clarifi es  who  did  what  and  when . It also divides the OV into two paragraphs:
            one describing previous work, and the other describing the current work. The reader
            is carefully guided through various studies before reaching Wordsworth’s conclu-
            sions for his present paper.

              This results in an increase in the number of words you will need to use – but clarity
            is more important than conciseness.

              I cannot overstress how important it is for you to make such differentiations between
            your work and that of others. Lack of such a differentiation is one of the most com-
            mon and serious mistakes made in research papers. It is imperative that you check

            through every sentence in which you report a finding, and make it 100% clear to the
            reader who is responsible for the fi nding.
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158