Page 154 - English for Writing Research Papers
P. 154

136



            7.10   Ensure that readers understand what you mean when

                  you write  the authors
              Another problem arises when in consecutive sentences you describe your results in
            relation to the results of two or more authors. In S1, it is not clear who  these authors
            refers to.

                S1.   *Our results agree with those on bilingual teenagers in Scandinavian countries by
                  Magnusson et al. (2011), and those from the Middle East by Hussein et al. (2009), who
                  used middle school and high school pupils;  these authors  ruled out the existence of…
               These authors  could refer to both Magnusson’s group and Hussein’s group, or just
            one or the other. If there is a possibility of ambiguity it is always best to specify the
            author again. In any case, S1 is very long and would be better written as S2.
                S2.   Our results agree with those obtained on bilingual children in Scandinavian countries by
                  Magnusson et al. (2011). They also agree with studies in the Middle East by Hussein
                  et al. (2009), who used middle school and high school pupils. Hussein et al. ruled out the
                  existence of…




            7.11   What to do if your paper is subject to a 'blind' review


              Before you submit your paper, find out if the paper will be subjected to a blind

            review or not. A blind review is when the referees do not know the author of the
            paper that they are reading. This means that the editor will delete your names and
            institutes from the top of the manuscript. The idea is to enable referees to be totally
            subjective in their recommendations.

              Consequently, you should avoid giving any clues as to who you are.

             So if your name is John Doe, in your draft version you should  not  write a sentence
            such as:

                S1.  In a previous paper (Doe et al, 2017) we demonstrated that …

              S1 would make it clear to the referees that you are John Doe and thus defeat the
            objective of a blind review. Instead you could write:

                S2.  Doe et al (2017) demonstrated that …

             However, when the paper has been accepted for publication, you should change all
            such sentences to the personal form (S1) so that you enable the reader to understand
            that when you write  Doe et al  you are in fact referring to your own work.
   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159