Page 159 - Towards_a_New_Malaysia_The_2018_Election_and_Its_6146371_(z-lib.org)
P. 159

144                                                     Haris Zuan

                  the voters to make informed decisions.  ey also criticised candidates who
                  failed to address issues concerning stateless children in their manifestos. Prior
                  to the campaign period, Borneo Komrad co-organised a forum with Bersih 2.0
                  to educate voters on key electoral issues.
                     Youth mobilized online, as well. Especially notable was an online
                  campaign started just after the Election Commission announced that the
                  polling day would be mid-week, called ‘Jom Balik Undi’ (‘Let’s go home
                  and vote’).  e polling date was expected to prove di cult for the many
                  voters who live and work far from where they vote, including in Singapore.
                   e initiative started on Facebook, where car-owners, regardless of ethnicity,
                  posted their travel plans for GE14, such as their destination, departure time
                  and date, number of seats available in their vehicle, and time and date of
                  their return journey. A group of university students also organized an online
                  crowd-funding campaign, #PulangMengundi (go home to vote), to sponsor
                  bus rides for fellow students to return home to vote.  eir #SponsorAStudent
                  raised funds both from Chinese associations across Malaysia and the public
                  (Loh 2018). Hence, GE14 saw creative e orts to mobilize young voters and
                  stepped-up youth involvement with formal politics, both within and outside
                  political parties.


                  Conclusion

                  Just after the historic 9 May result, an UMNO youth leader (later elected the
                  new UMNO Youth chief) acknowledged that UMNO’s and BN’s failure to
                  secure the youth vote was one of the reasons for the coalition’s  rst defeat after
                  being in power for 61 years (Utusan 2018). Pakatan Harapan is well aware
                  that, for the time being, the youth vote is in their favour. It is therefore not
                  surprising that the PH government proposed lowering the voting age from
                  21 to 18 (Syahredzan 2018). Even UMNO, having su ered its worst-ever
                  defeat, announced that it would lower its membership age from 18 to 16
                  (Khairil 2018). BN component-party the Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC),
                  too, noted in August 2018 the need for political-education programmes to
                  cultivate successors to its current leadership (Palansamy 2018). Yet sparking
                  young people’s interest and granting access to youth form only part of the
                  issue; empowering youth to participate in decision-making also matters. PH
                  has an advantage not only among young voters, but also in  elding younger
                  candidates.  e PH parties’ comparatively relaxed structure and absence of
                  steep hierarchies facilitate their promoting young talent.  ese qualities are in
                  contrast with the older UMNO and PAS, both of which have in place rigid
                  structures that make it di cult for youths to make it to the top.





                        This content downloaded from 139.80.253.0 on Fri, 06 Nov 2020 04:22:16 UTC
                                   All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164