Page 142 - fbkCardioDiabetes_2017
P. 142

118                          Cardio Diabetes Medicine 2017






               Study     Study Population  Sample    Months Drug &    On Treatment  Median Change of Pav
                                         Size        Dose             LDL-C
               REVERSAL Stable CAD       654         18 mon           2.05         +0.2% (_0.3% to 0.5%),
                                                     Atorvastatin 80               p = 0.18 vs. baseline
               ASTEROID  Stable CAD      349         24 mon Rosuvas-  1.57         -0.79% (-1.21% to 0.53%),
                                                     tatin40                       p <0.001 vs. baseline
               SATURN    Stable CAD      1039        24  mon          1.82         -0.99% (_1.19 to _0.63),
                                                     Atorvastatin 80   1.62        p <0.001 vs. baseline
                                                     Rosuvastatin40                1.22% (_1.52 to _0.90),
                                                                                   p < 0.001 vs. baseline
               IBIS 4    STEMI           103         13 mon Rosuvasta- 1.90        0.90% (_1.56% to - 0.25%),
                                                     tin 40
                                                                                   p 1/4 0.007 vs. baseline
                 Table 2: REVERSAL, ASTEROID, SATURN, IBIS 4 are the four studies reporting statin-mediated plaque
                                            regression and the results are summarized.

              of plaque progression or regression                In SATURN, diabetics achieved lower  LDL-C levels
                                                                 and showed similar  PAV regression  as did non-dia-
              LDL-C levels were independent predictors of plaque
              regression in both ASTEROID and SATURN [10].       betic patients overall  (0.83  7 0.13%  vs. 1.15 7 0.13%),
                                                                 as well as in the setting of on-treatment LDL-C < 70
                                                                 mg/dl (1.09 +/- 0.16% vs. 1.24 +/- 0.16%); PAV reduction
              Diabetes mellitus and Higher systolic blood        was lower in diabetics only when on-treatment LDL-C
              pressure :                                         was >70 mg/dl [12].
              Continued plaque growth despite LDL-C levels below   In  ASTEROID  : Atheroma regression  was compara-
              the  recommended thresholds was associated with    ble  in patients with  vs. without  diabetes  [0.9%  (2.8
              the presence  of diabetes  mellitus, higher  systolic   to 0.9)  vs. 0.8% (3.0  to 0.8)] [4].  These  findings  are
              blood pressure, and smaller increase in HDL-C [11].
                                                                 in contrast with earlier observations obtained from a
              Baseline  PAV: Strongest multivariable  predictor of   pooled analysis of IVUS studies where diabetics had
              PAV regression  in SATURN  was  increased  baseline   an on-treatment LDL-C  of 80mg/dl and displayed
              PAV.                                               PAV increase of 0.6% as compared with LDL-C levels
                                                                 of 84  mg/dl  and  no significant  progression  of PAV
              CRP:
                                                                 in non-diabetics [13].
              •   Pivotal role of inflammation in atherosclerosis [1]   Very high-intensity statins produce plaque regression
                 has also been reflected in serial IVUS studies.
                                                                 among diabetics and  reduce the  differences  in the
              •   In REVERSAL,  reduction of  C-reactive protein   natural  history of coronary atherosclerotic disease
                 (CRP) was identified as an independent predictor   between patients with or without diabetes when very
                 of a reduction in plaque progression .          low LDL-C levels (<70 mg/dl) are achieved.
              •   In  SATURN non-increasing levels  of CRP after   Association  between  plaque regression  and clinical
                 24 months of intensive statin therapy were inde-  outcomes:
                 pendently associated with greater PAV regression
                                                                 Coronary imaging studies have improved the under-
              These insights not only signify inter individual varia-  standingof the natural history of atherosclerosis and
              tion, but also  highlight  the multifactorial nature and   of the efficacy of anti-atherosclerotic medications on
              complex pathobiology  of atherosclerosis  and  rein-  coronary  plaque. Plaque  stabilization or  regression
              force the need for intensive modification of global risk   as defined by imaging end points translates into im-
              beyond reduction of LDL-C in patients with coronary   proved  clinical  outcomes. Plaque  burden measured
              artery disease.                                    by IVUS correlates with established clinical risk fac-
                                                                 tors and may predict subsequent clinical events .FiG2
              Plaque regression in Diabetic patient
              populations
              Diabetic  patients are  at high  risk  of accelerated
              plaque growth and ischemic events.

                                                         GCDC 2017
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147