Page 715 - Hall et al (2015) Principles of Critical Care-McGraw-Hill
P. 715

534     PART 4: Pulmonary Disorders


                 could have a sustained antimicrobial effect within the proximal air-  The largest randomized trial comparing ranitidine to sucralfate showed
                 ways and block biofilm formation at its surface. 400-405  Such a device was   that ranitidine was superior in preventing gastrointestinal bleeding
                 evaluated in a large, randomized, multicenter, single-blind trial by Kollef     and did not increase the risk of VAP.  Therefore, despite the potential
                                                                                                  101
                 et al.  The authors conclude that the new device was able to lower the   advantage of sucralfate (potentially less VAP with more gastrointestinal
                     406
                 VAP frequency from 7.5% for the control group to 4.8% for the group   bleeding)  over  H -blockers (potentially  more  VAP  with  less  gastroin-
                                                                                    2
                 receiving the silver-coated endotracheal tube. The silver-coated tube,   testinal bleeding) in preventing VAP, stress ulcer prophylaxis with H -
                                                                                                                          2
                 however, did not reduce mortality rates, the duration of intubation,   blockers appears to be safe in patients who are at high risk for bleeding
                 hospital length of stay, or the frequency or severity of adverse effects.  as well as VAP.  Although proton-pump inhibitors are now widely used
                                                                                  416
                     ■  VENTILATOR CIRCUIT MANAGEMENT                  for gastric bleeding prophylaxis in the ICU, based on their potentially
                                                                       higher efficacy, their use is associated with similar rates of nosocomial
                 Decreased frequency of ventilator-circuit change, replacement of heated   pneumonia as H -blockers. 415,417-421
                                                                                   2
                 humidifiers by heat and moisture exchangers, decreased frequency of heat     ■  SELECTIVE DIGESTIVE DECONTAMINATION
                 and moisture exchanger change, and closed suctioning systems have been
                 tested for preventing VAP. 1,328,329,407  Four randomized trials of decreased   Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) includes a short
                 frequency of ventilator  circuit  changes  have  been  published.  Changes   course of systemic antibiotic therapy, such as cefotaxime, trimethoprim
                 every 2 days, 7 days, and no scheduled change did not find significant   or a fluoroquinolone, and topical administration of nonabsorbable
                 difference in the rate of VAP as summarized in a recent meta-analysis.    antibiotics (usually an aminoglycoside, polymyxin B and amphotericin)
                                                                   408
                 One meta-analysis summarized the results of five randomized, controlled   to the mouth and stomach, in order to eradicate potentially patho-
                                                                                                            422
                 trials which compared the effects of heated humidifiers and heat and   genic bacteria and yeast that may cause infections.  Since the original
                                                                                                        423
                 moisture exchangers on the risk of VAP.  Only one out of these five   study published by Stoutenbeck et al in 1984,  which demonstrated a
                                               329
                 studies found a significant reduction of VAP rate with the use of heat and   decrease of the overall infection rate in patients receiving the SDD regi-
                 moisture exchangers.  Efficacy of both humidification strategies seems   men, more than 40 randomized, controlled trials, and 8 meta-analyses
                                134
                 comparable. Two studies, however, reported increased rates of endotra-  have been published. All eight meta-analyses reported a significant
                 cheal tube occlusion with the use of heat and moisture exchangers; the   reduction in the risk of VAP, and four reported a significant reduction
                 increased resistive load can cause difficulties in ventilation and weaning in   in mortality. 90,424-427  Recently, three prospective, randomized, controlled
                 patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome—related to larger   trials, all performed in ICUs with low rates of antibiotic resistance, have
                 dead space. No other adverse effects were observed. No effect on mortality   been published that were large enough to show a significant survival
                 was reported. Finally, one study has evaluated the impact of less frequent   benefit in SDD treated patients. 428-430  All three were in favor of treatment
                 changes (daily vs every 5 days) in heat and moisture exchangers on the   with SDD, the largest and most recent one by De Smet et al demon-
                 development of VAP.  No difference in the VAP rates was observed.  strating a relative decrease in 28-day mortality rate (OR 0.83, 95% CI,
                                409
                   To avoid hypoxia, hypotension and contamination of suction catheters   0.72-0.97) and an absolute survival benefit of 3.5%. 430
                 entering the tracheal tube, investigators have examined closed suctioning   In spite of these benefits, widespread use of SDD in ICU patients
                 systems. 407,410,411  They either found a nonsignificantly lower prevalence of   remains controversial. The major concern with use of SDD is that it
                 VAP for patients managed with the closed system compared to the open   probably needs to be used in nearly all patients in a given ICU, and this
                 system, without any adverse effect,  or they found that its use was associ-  widespread use has been shown in some studies to promote the emer-
                                         411
                 ated with an increased frequency of endotracheal colonization.  Closed-  gence of resistant bacteria, particularly gram positives such as MRSA. 431-
                                                             410
                 suction systems also failed to reduce cross-transmission and acquisition   435  This is likely to be even a greater problem in ICUs with a high baseline
                 rates of the most relevant gram-negative bacteria in ICU patients in a   rate of resistance. 328,329,436  In contrast to what was expected, however,
                 prospective crossover study in which 1110 patients were enrolled. 407  most studies that have evaluated this issue showed a lower incidence
                                                                       of colonization with (multi)resistant bacteria in SDD treated patients
                     ■  METHODS OF ENTERAL FEEDING                     than in control patients. 429,437  In a single-center observational study
                 Nearly all ventilated patients have a nasogastric tube inserted to man-  from Germany, 5-year use of SDD was not associated with an increase
                                                                       of MRSA or aminoglycoside and beta lactam resistance in gram-
                 age gastric and enteral secretions, prevent gastric distention, or provide   negative bacteria.  Putative explanations why colonization with resistant
                                                                                    438
                 nutritional support. A nasogastric tube may increase the risk for gastro-  microorganisms is lower after treatment with SDD include the almost
                 esophageal reflux, aspiration, and VAP.  Four randomized, controlled   invariable sensibility of gram-negative aerobic bacteria for the com-
                                              80
                 trials have evaluated  methods of  enteral  feeding  aimed at  preventing   monly used combination of polymyxin E and tobramycin, the fact that
                 VAP: postpyloric or jejunal feeding (vs gastric feeding), the use of motil-  treatment with polymyxin E rarely induces resistance, the very high local
                 ity agents (metoclopramide vs placebo), acidification of feeding (with   concentrations in the bowel of the used antibiotics, and the lower rate of
                 addition of hydrochloric acid), and intermittent (vs continuous) feed-  use of systemic antibiotics in SDD-treated patients. 439
                 ing 116,412,413  These studies did not find differences in incidence of VAP or
                 mortality rates. Potentially serious adverse affects have been observed in     ■  IMPLEMENTING A STRUCTURED PREVENTION POLICY
                 patients receiving acidified feeding (gastrointestinal bleeding) or inter-  The application of consistent evidence-based interventions to prevent
                 mittent enteral feeding (increased gastric volume and lower volumes of   VAP  has  been  highly  variable  from  one  ICU  to  another  and  often
                 feeding). Thus, to date, methods of enteral feeding aimed at reducing the   suboptimal. 440,441  Moreover, no single preventive measure can succeed
                 incidence of VAP cannot be recommended for routine use.  alone, emphasizing the need to use multifaceted and multidisciplinary
                     ■  STRESS ULCER PROPHYLAXIS                       programs to prevent VAP. Such programs are frequently referred to as

                                                                       “care bundles.” A care bundle is a set of readily implementable interven-
                 Gastric colonization by potentially pathogenic organisms has been   tions that are required to be undertaken for each patient on a regular
                 shown to increase with decreasing gastric acidity.  Thus, medications   basis.  The key goal is that every intervention must be implemented
                                                     414
                                                                           442
                 that decrease gastric acidity (antacids, H -blockers, proton-pump inhibi-  for every patient on every day of his or her stay in the ICU. Compliance
                                              2
                 tors) may increase organism counts and increase the risk of VAP. In   is assessed for the bundle as a whole, so failure to complete even a single
                 contrast, medications that do not affect gastric acidity (sucralfate) may   intervention means failure of the whole bundle at a particular assess-
                 not increase this risk. Several meta-analyses of more than 20 random-  ment. The interventions need to be packaged in such a way that they are
                 ized trials have evaluated the risk for VAP associated with the methods   easy to assess for compliance, which usually means that no more than
                 used to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. 99,100,415    five interventions are included in each care bundle. The performance







            section04.indd   534                                                                                       1/23/2015   2:20:39 PM
   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720