Page 678 - Cardiac Nursing

e 6
e 6
54
A
54
g
54.
54.
8-6
g
8-6
A
ara
ara
a
In
a
t
p
A
p
t
p
/09
1
/09
/30
/30
1
2:0
1 A
2:0
M
1 A
6
M
q
Pa
g
Pa
q
6
6
xd
q
xd
In
c.
c.
p
63
63
p
LWBK340-c27_
LWB
LWB K34 0-c 27_ pp638-654.qxd 6/30/09 12:01 AM Page 654 Aptara Inc.
K34
c.
27_
0-c
654 PA R T I V / Pathophysiology and Management of Heart Disease
40. Stults, K. R., Brown, D. D., Kerber, R. E., et al. (1986). Efficacy of an au- 58. Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial II Study Group. (1991). A randomized
tomated external defibrillator in the management of out-of-hospital car- clinical study of a calcium-entry blocker (Lidoflazine) in the treatment of
diac arrest: Validation of the diagnostic algorithm and initial experience in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. New England Journal of Medicine,
4
4
a rural environment. Circulation, 73, 701–709. 324, 1225–1231.
41. Zafari, A. M., Zarter, S. K., & Wilson, P. (2004). A program encouraging 59. Bernard, S. A., Gray, T. W., Buist, M. D., et al. (2002). Treatment of com-
early defibrillation results in improved In-hospital resuscitation efficacy. atose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia.
6
6
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 44(4), 846–852. New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 549–556.
42. Kerber, R., Kouba, C., Martins, J., et al. (1984). Advance predication of 60. Echt, D. S., Liebson, P. R., Mitchell, L. B., et al. (1991). Mortality and
transthoracic impedance in human defibrillation and cardioversion: morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. New
Importance of impedance in determining success of low energy shocks. England Journal of Medicine, 324(12), 781–188.
Circulation, 70, 303–308. 61. Booth, C. M., Boone, R. H., Tominson, G., et al. (2004). Is the patient
43. Sado, D. M., & Deakin, C. D. (2005). How good is your defibrillation dead, vegetative, or severely neurologically impaired? Assessing outcome
technique? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 98, 3–6. for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. JAMA, 291, 870–879.
44. Bissing, J., & Kerber, R. (2000). Effect of shaving the chest of hirsute sub- 62. Singh, B. N. (1990). Advantages of beta-blockers versus antiarrhythmic
jects on transthoracic impedance to self-adhesive defibrillation electrode agents and calcium channel antagonists in secondary prevention after
pads. American Journal of Cardiology, 86, 587–589. myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology, 66(90), 9C–20C.
6
6
6
6
45. Kern, K. B., Hilwig, R. W., Berg, R. A., et al. (2002). Importance of con- 63. Reynolds, M. R., Pinto, D. S., & Josephson, M. E. (2008). Hurst’s the
tinuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Im- heart, 12th Edition. R. A. Walsh & D. I. Simon (Ed. Online edition), In
proved outcome during a simulated single lay rescuer scenario. Circulation, M. H. Crawford (Ed.), Sudden Cardiac Death (chap. 49). McGraw-Hill
105, 645–649. Company, Inc.
46. Van Alem, A. P., Chapman, F. W., Lank, P., et al. (2003). A prospective, ran- 64. Køber, L., Torp-Pederson, C., Carlsen, J. E., et al. (1995). A clinical trial
domised and blinded comparison of first shock success of monophasic and for the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor trandolapril in patients
biphasic waveforms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation, 58, 17–24. with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. New England
47. Berg, M. D., Clark, L. L., & Valenzuela, T. D. (2005). Post-shock chest Journal of Medicine, 333, 1670–1676.
compression delays with automated external defibrillator use. Resuscita- 65. Tel, H., & Tel, H. (2006). The effect of individualized education on the
tion, 64, 287–291. transfer anxiety of patients with myocardial infarction and their families.
4
4
48. Eftestol, T., Sunde, K., & Steen, P. A. (2002). Effects of interrupting pre- Heart & Lung, 35(2), 101–107.
cordial compressions on the calculated probability of defibrillation success 66. Kamphuis, H. C., De Leeuw, R. J., Derksen, R., et al. (2002). A 12-
during our-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation, 105, 2270–2273. month quality of life assessment of cardiac arrest survivors treated with
49. Yu, T., Weil, M. H., Tang, W., et al. (2002). Adverse outcomes of inter- or without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Europace, 4,
rupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation. Circula- 417–425.
tion, 106, 368–372. 67. Middelkamp, W., Moulaert, V. R., Verbunt, J. A., et al. (2007). Life after
6
6
50. Kudenchuk, P. J., Cobb, L. A., Copass, M. K., et al. (1999). Amiodarone survival: Long-term daily life functioning and quality of life of patients
for resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fib- with hypoxic brain injury as a result of a cardiac arrest. Clinical Rehabili-
rillation. New England Journal of Medicine, 341, 871–878. tation, 21, 425–431.
51. Dorian, P., Cass, D., Schwartz, B., et al. (2002). Amiodarone as compared 68. Ladwig, K. H., Schoefinius, A., Dammann, G., et al. (1999). Long-acting
with lidocaine for shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation. New England psychotraumatic properties of a cardiac arrest experience. American Jour-
6
6
Journal of Medicine, 346, 884–890. nal of Psychiatry, 156, 912–919.
6
6
52. Schulman, S. P., Hartmann, T. K., & Geocadin, R. G. (2006). Intensive 69. Dougherty, C. M. (2001). The natural history of recovery following sud-
care after resuscitation from cardiac arrest: A focus on heart and brain in- den cardiac arrest and internal cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.
4
4
6
6
jury. Neurologic Clinics, 24, 41–59. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing, 16(4), 163–168.
53. Rea, T. D., Helbock, M., Perry, S., et al. (2006). Increasing use of cardiopul- 70. Bunch, T. J., Hammill, S. C., & White, R. D. (2005). Outcomes after
monary resuscitation during out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation arrest: Sur- ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Expanding the chain
vival implication of guideline changes. Circulation, 114, 2760–2765. of survival. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 80(6), 774–782.
4
4
54. Ornato, J. P., & Peberdy, M. A. (2006). Measuring progress in 71. Bunch, T. J., White, R. D., Smith, G. E., et al. (2004). Long-term subjec-
4
resuscitation—It’s time for a better tool. 114, 2754–2756. tive memory function in ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
4
55. Sunde, K., Pytte, M., Jacobsen, D., et al. (2007). Implementation of a survivors resuscitated by early defibrillation. Resuscitation, 60, 189–195.
standardised treatment protocol for post resuscitation care after out-of- 72. Dougherty, C. M., Pyper, G. P., & Benoliel, J. Q. (2004). Domains of
hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation, 73, 29–39. concern of intimate partners of sudden cardiac arrest survivors after ICD
56. Werling, M., Thoren, A. B., Axelsson, C., et al. (2007). Treatment and out- implantation. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 19(1), 21–31.
come in post-resuscitation care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest when a 73. Dickerson, S. S., Posluszny, M., & Kennedy, M. C. (2000). Help seeking
modern therapeutic approach was introduced. Resuscitation, 73, 40–45. in a support group for recipients of implantable cardioverter defibrillators
57. Holzer, M., & The Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest Study Group. and the support persons. Heart and Lung, 29(2), 87–96.
(2002). Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic out- 74. Shea, J. B. (2004). Quality of life issues in patients with implantable
come after cardiac arrest. New England Journal of Medicine, 346(8), cardioverter defibrillators—Driving occupation, and recreation. AACN
6
6
549–556. Clinical Issues, 15(3), 478–489.