Page 321 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 321

288  n  MENTAL STATUS MEASUREMENT



           the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data   by  the  mere  fact  of  aging  they  are  at  risk
           (Petterson, Williams, Hauenstein, Rovnyak,   for  developing  Alzheimer’s  disease,  could
   M       & Merwin, 2009).                         have  undetected  mild  cognitive  impair-
              An  emerging  and  significant  area  of   ment (MCI),  or cognitive deficits  secondary
           MHSR that nurse researchers have begun to   to other disease processes. The Mini-Mental
           address  is  the  integrated  mental  and  phys-  State Examination (MMSE; Folstein, Folstein,
           ical health care for persons with severe co-  &  McHugh,  1975)  is  a  brief  clinical  assess-
           occurring  mental  and  physical  disorders.   ment appropriate for use in a variety of set-
           Traditionally, research in this area has been   tings for cognitive screening of older adults.
           conducted  by  other  types  of  health  care   Up to 75% of cases of dementia or probable
           researchers  such  as  psychiatrists,  psycholo-  dementia are not identified by primary care
           gists, social workers and physicians, and often   physicians,  most  likely  because  of  the  brief
           not in community health care settings. There   time available for an office visit (Holsinger,
           are some nursing research programs within   Deveau, Boustani, & Williams, 2010). A 5- to
           academic  centers,  such  as  the  University   10-minute  baseline  assessment  of  cognitive
           of  Illinois–Chicago  Nursing  Integrated   status using the MMSE would allow for early
           Health  Care  (IHC)  Center  that  researches   diagnosis  of  neurodegenerative  disorders
           best practices for systems of integrated care   such as Alzheimer’s disease, identification of
           (McDevitt, Braun, Noyes, Snyder, & Marion,   cognitive impairment secondary to a stroke
           2005; University of Illinois–Chicago College   or  diseases  such  as  Parkinson  disease,  or
           of Nursing, 2010). Internationally, some nurse   detection of cognitive impairment caused by
           researcher teams have partnered with com-  medication side effects.
           munity health centers to study the impact of   The MMSE was constructed more than
           integrated care (Smith & Ross, 2007). These   35 years ago to conduct serial cognitive test-
           nursing community collaborative initiatives   ing of patients on a neurogeriatric ward. The
           show promise for improving health care ser-  MMSE  has  been  translated  into  more  than
           vices  for  people  with  severe  co-occurring   50  languages  (Dean,  Feldman,  &  Morton,
           mental and physical disorders and are a pri-  2009),  is  the  most  widely  used  cognitive
           ority for continued nursing research.    assessment  scale  (Holsinger  et  al.,  2010),
                                                    and was cited by 7000 articles in the OVID
                                     Celia E. Wills  Medline database from 1986 to August 2010.
                                 Anna L.D. Villena  The MMSE was developed to be a brief and
                                                    easy  to  administer  clinical  evaluation  tool.
                                                    Scores range from all correct (30) to no cor-
                                                    rect  (0)  responses.  Scores  of  26–29  indicate
                    Mental status                   questionable  dementia,  21–25  mild  demen-
           MeasureMent: Mini-Mental                 tia, 11–20 moderate, and 0–10 severe demen-
                                                    tia (Perneczky et al., 2006).
                 state exaMination                      Six  categories  of  cognitive  tasks  com-
                                                    prise the MMSE: (1) orientation determined
                                                    by  responses  to  five  questions  each  about
           Recognizing cognitive impairment is impor-  time  and  place  (10  points);  (2)  registration
           tant  for  establishing  patients’  capacity  to   assessed  by  ability  to  learn  the  names  of
           make (or not) independent health care deci-  three unrelated objects (3 points); (3) atten-
           sions  to  be  active  participants  in  their  care   tion  and  calculation  tested  by  either  per-
           and  for  providing  individualized  qual-  forming serial sevens or spelling the word
           ity  care.  It  is  especially  important  to  know   “world”  backwards  (5  points);  (4)  recall
           the cognitive status of older adults because   evaluated  by  naming  the  three  objects
   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326