Page 322 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 322

MENTAL STATUS MEASUREMENT  n  289



             previously learned (3 points); (5) language   was supported by convergent and discrimi-
             assessed  by  six  items  of  naming  two   nant validity comparing hypothesized sim-
             objects, repeating a statement, following a   ilarities/differences  between  scores  from   M
             three-stage  verbal  command,  reading  and   three  groups  of  normal,  demented,  and
             following a written command, and writing   depressed subjects with and without cogni-
             a  sentence  spontaneously  (8  points);  and   tive symptoms.
             (6) visual–spatial  capacity  by copying two   The MMSE is the most studied of all cog-
             intersecting pentagons (1 point).        nitive tests (Holsinger et al., 2010). Additional
                 To  administer  the  MMSE,  a  one-page   cognitive tests have been developed and com-
             sheet with items/instructions and space for   pared with the MMSE across conditions, and
             writing  scores  is  used.  The  MMSE  is  not  a   those empirical data have supported the sensi-
             timed test but usually takes 5 to 10 minutes.   tivity and specificity of the MMSE as a cogni-
             The tester asks the patient to respond to each   tive screening scale. Sensitivity, the percentage
             item  and  records  individual  scores.  Item   of  people  who  test  positive  (number  of  true
             scores are summed to provide the final score   positives divided by the number of true posi-
             and a calculator is not needed. The MMSE is a   tives plus the number of false negatives), has
             copyrighted scale, and the Mini-Mental LLC   ranged from 71% to 92% (Boustani et al., 2003).
             of  Massachusetts  offers  forms,  guides,  and   Specificity, the percentage of people who test
             software through Psychological Assessment   negative (number of true-negatives divided by
             Resources  of  Florida  for  approximately  $1   the number of true-negatives plus the num-
             per test (Powsner & Powsner, 2005).      ber  of  false-positives)  has  ranged  from  56%
                 Before conducting an MMSE assessment,   to  96%  (Boustani  et  al.,  2003).  Therefore,  the
             the  nurse  or  other  tester  should  make  the   MMSE is expected to correctly identify per-
             patient  comfortable  and  establish  rapport.   sons with mild to moderate cognitive impair-
             During the testing, praising success and not   ment approximately 80% of the time and not
             pressing on items the patient finds difficult   to incorrectly identify persons as having mild
             should enhance cooperation. The testing sit-  to moderate cognitive impairment when they
             uation may be embarrassing for patients who   do not approximately 75% of the time.
             are aware that they are “missing” some items   Variables  other  than  cognitive  status,
             and the nurse needs to protect the self-esteem   most notably age and education, may influ-
             of such patients while preserving the integ-  ence test scores (Butler, Ashford, & Snowdon,
             rity  of  the  testing  procedures.  As  with  any   1996).  Older  persons  and  those  with  low
             scale, the degree to which the MMSE is reli-  education  may  score  slightly  lower  yet
             able and valid is critical. The tester needs to   have  higher  cognitive  capacity  so  there  are
             follow the administration procedures exactly   MMSE test norms based on these variables
             and clinicians/researchers need to interpret   (Crum,  Anthony,  Bassett,  &  Folstein,  1993).
             the meaning of scores properly.          Modifications have been made for culturally
                 Psychometric  assessment  of  the  MMSE   and  linguistically  appropriate  MMSE  ver-
             has been conducted. Reliability and validity   sions  (Folstein,  1998).  An  increased  risk  of
             estimates of the MMSE were satisfactory for   false-positives  has  been  found  when  using
             a screening tool (Folstein et al., 1975). Initial   the  MMSE  with  the  culturally  deaf  popu-
             reliability,  accuracy  by  measuring  consis-  lation (Dean et al., 2009). Scores need to be
             tency in the items and different raters, was   interpreted  differently  for  persons  with
             adequate for interrater agreement and retest   visual or auditory deficits that preclude use
             stability when  two  samples  of  patients  and   of certain items that require sight or hearing
             several  test  administrators  were  compared.   or impact test performance.
             Validity, the degree to which the MMSE mea-  After 35 years of use, an MMSE score of
             sures the construct of cognitive impairment,   23 points or less is generally considered to be
   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327