Page 813 - ACCCN's Critical Care Nursing
P. 813

790








         Picture Credits






         The authors and publishers would like to thank and acknowledge the contributions below:




         FIGURE 4.1 From: Angus DC, Carlet J. Surviving intensive   system. In: Hatchett R, Thompson D, eds. Cardiac nursing:
           care: a report from the 2002 Brussels Roundtable. Inten-  a  comprehensive  guide.  Philadelphia:  Churchill  Living-
           sive Care Med 2003; 29(3): 368–77.                   stone Elsevier; 2002.
         FIGURE  7.1  From:  McKinley  S,  Coote  K,  Stein-Parbury  J.   FIGURE 9.12–9.15 From: Urden L, Stacy KL, Lough ME, eds.
           Development and testing of a Faces Scale for the assess-  Critical care nursing: diagnosis and management, 6th edn.
           ment of anxiety in critically ill patients. J Adv Nurs 2003;   St Louis: Mosby/Elsevier; 2010.
           41(1): 73–9.                                       FIGURE  9.19  From:  Woodrow  P.  Intensive  care  nursing.
         FIGURE  7.2  From:  Bergeron  N,  Dubois  MJ,  Dumont  M,   London: Routledge; 2000.
           Dial  S,  Skrobik  Y.  Intensive  Care  Delirium  Screening   FIGURE 9.22 Courtesy Pulsion Medical Systems.
           Checklist:  evaluation  of  a  new  screening  tool.  Intensive   FIGURE 10.1 From: Bersten AD, Soni N, Oh TE. Oh’s intensive
           Care Med 2001; 27(5): 859–64.                        care manual,  5th  edn.  Oxford:  Butterworth-Heinemann,
         FIGURE  7.3  From:  Ely  EW,  Margolin  R,  Francis  J,  May  L,   2003.
           Truman  B  et  al.  Evaluation  of  delirium  in  critically  ill   FIGURE  10.6  Courtesy  National  Heart  Foundation  of
           patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method   Australia  ©  2011.  http://www.heartfoundation.org.au/
           for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med 2001;   acute-coronary-syndrome.
           29(7): 1370–79. Copyright © 2002, E. Wesley Ely, MD, MPH   FIGURES 10.7, 10.10, 10.16 From: Urden L, Stacy K, Lough
           and Vanderbilt University, all rights reserved.      M.  Thelan’s  critical  care  nursing:  diagnosis  and  manage-
         FIGURE  7.4  From:  Sessler  CN,  Gosnell  M,  Grap  MJ  et  al.   ment, 5th edn. St Louis: Mosby; 2006.
           The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reli-  FIGURE 10.8 From: Bryant B, Knights K, Saterno E. Pharma-
           ability in adult intensive care patients. Am J Resp Crit Care   cology for Health Professionals. Sydney: Mosby; 2003.
           Med 2002; 166: 1338–44.                            FIGURE 10.9 From: Michaelson CR. Congestive heart failure.
         FIGURE  7.5  From:  de  Lemos  J, Tweeddale  M,  Chittock  D.   St Louis: Mosby; 1983.
           Measuring  quality  of  sedation  in  adult  mechanically     FIGURES  10.11-10.15  From:  National  Heart  Foundation
           ventilated critically ill patients. The Vancouver Interaction   of  Australia  and  the  Cardiac  Society  of  Australia  and
           and Calmness Scale. Sedation Focus Group. J Clin Epide-  New Zealand. Guidelines for the prevention, detection and
           miol 2000; 53(9): 908–19.                            management  of  people  with  chronic  heart  failure  in
         FIGURE 7.6 From: Payen JF, Bru O, Bosson JL, Lagrasta A,   Australia 2006. Melbourne: National Heart Foundation of
           Novel E et al. Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patients   Australia; 2006.
           by  using  a  behavioral  pain  scale.  Crit  Care  Med  2001;   FIGURE 11.48 Courtesy St Jude Medical Sylmar CA.
           29(12): 2258–63.                                   FIGURE 11.51 Courtesy St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN.
         FIGURE 9.1 From: Novak B, Filer L, Hatchett R. The applied   FIGURE 12.1 From: Huether S, McCance K. Understanding
           anatomy  and  physiology  of  the  cardiovascular  system.     pathophysiology. St Louis: Mosby; 1996.
           In: Hatchett R, Thompson D, eds. Cardiac nursing: a com-  FIGURES  12.2,  12.3  From:  Urden  L,  Stacy  K,  Lough  M.
           prehensive  guide.  Philadelphia:  Churchill  Livingstone   Thelan’s critical care nursing: diagnosis and management,
           Elsevier; 2002.                                      5th edn. St Louis: Mosby; 2006.
         FIGURES 9.2–9.4, 9.6, 9.7, 9.9, 9.10, 9.16, 9.20, 9.21 From:   FIGURE 12.4 Courtesy Datascope Corporation, Fairfield, NJ.
           Urden  L,  Stacy  KL,  Lough  ME,  eds.  Thelan’s  critical  care   FIGURE 12.12 (A) and (B) Courtesy Thoratec Corporation;
           nursing:  diagnosis  and  management,  5th  edn.  St  Louis:   (C) Courtesy Ventracor Limited.
           Mosby/Elsevier; 2006.                              FIGURE  12.13  From:  Agrifoglio  M,  Dainese  L,  Pasotti  S,
         FIGURE 9.5 From: Bersten AD, Soni N, Oh TE. Oh’s intensive   Galanti A, Cannata A et al. Preoperative assessment of the
           care manual,  6th  edn.  Oxford:  Butterworth-Heinemann;   radial  artery  for  coronary  artery  bypass  grafting:  is  the
           2009.                                                Clinical Allen Test adequate? Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79(2):
         FIGURE 9.8 From: Elliott D. Shock. In: Romanini J, Daly J,   570–72.
           eds. Critical care nursing: Australian perspectives. Sydney:   FIGURE 12.15 From: Newcomb AE, Esmore DS, Rosenfeldt
           Harcourt Brace; 1994. p. 687.                        FL,  Richardson  M,  Marasco  SF.  Heterotopic  heart  trans-
         FIGURE  9.11  From:  Novak  B,  Filer  L,  Hatchett  R.  The   plantation: an expanding role in the twenty-first century?
     790   applied  anatomy  and  physiology  of  the  cardiovascular   Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78(4): 1345–50.
   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818