Page 108 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 108

C H A P T E R           8 

                                      PHARMACOGENOMICS AND HEMATOLOGIC DISEASES


                                                                              Leo Kager and William E. Evans




            A fundamental hypothesis pursued in genetics is that heritable genetic   rearrangements that affect >50 bp of sequence). Comparisons among
            variation  (i.e.,  genotypes  or  haplotypes)  translates  into  inherited   human genomes showed that they differ more as a consequence of
            phenotypes (e.g., disease risk, drug response). On the basis of this   structural variation than as a result of single-nucleotide variation. For
            hypothesis, one aim of medical genetics and pharmacogenomics is to   practical purposes, the term sequence variation is mainly used herein.
            understand the myriad associations between inherited genotypes and   Polymorphisms are defined as common inherited variations in DNA
            specific phenotypes of disease or drug response, with the ultimate goal   sequence that are typically, although somewhat arbitrarily, defined as
            of better defining the risk for, or outcome of, diseases and the response   the least common allele having a frequency of 1% or more in the
            to specific medications. In cancer, disease prognosis and treatment   population.
            response can be affected by both inherited (germline) and acquired
            (somatic)  genome  variation,  and  both  types  of  genome  variation
            have been shown to alter the effects of certain medications. Many   SINGLE-NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS
            seminal discoveries in medical genetics were made in the course of
            investigating hematologic disorders, as exemplified by the fact that the   The most common and important inherited sequence variations are
            most prevalent monogenic disorders, the hemoglobinopathies, affect   SNPs,  positions  in  the  genome  where  individuals  have  inherited
            approximately 7% of the world’s population. Pharmacogenomics also   a nucleotide that differs from the most common sequence (“wild-
            has  a  long  tradition  in  hematology;  one  of  the  first  documented   type”) at the position in the genome. Many efforts are underway to
            clinical observations of inherited differences in drug effects was the   catalogue these variants, because a comprehensive SNP catalog offers
            relationship  between  hemolysis  after  antimalarial  therapy  and  the   the possibility to pinpoint important variants in which nucleotide
            inherited  glucose-6-phosphate  dehydrogenase  (G6PD)  activity  in   changes  alter  the  function  or  expression  of  a  gene  that  influences
            erythrocytes. 1                                       diseases  or  response  to  medications.  The  main  public  database  is
              In the pregenomic era, efforts concentrated on mapping highly   the “Database of Short Genetic Variations” (dbSNP; a repository of
            penetrant monogenic (Mendelian) loci for both specific diseases and   genetic variations less than 50 bp in length) and a growing number of
            drug-metabolizing pathways that influence the effects of medications.   SNPs (currently about 88 million validated) has recently been driven
            Completion of the Human Genome Project and the development   largely by the International HapMap Project and the 1000 Genomes
            of  arrays  for  genome-wide  single-nucleotide  polymorphism  (SNP)   Project (see Table 8.1).
            and DNA methylation analyses, “next-generation” DNA sequencing
            technologies  (whole-exome  sequencing  [coding  regions  only]  and
            whole-genome  sequencing  [coding  and  noncoding  regions])  have   SINGLE-NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS  
            enabled relatively inexpensive and essentially agnostic genome-wide   AND PHENOTYPES
            approaches to identify genomic variants that predispose to diseases
            and/or modify drug responses and/or contribute to heterogeneity of   SNPs  are  present  in  exons,  introns,  promoters,  enhancers,  and
            monogenetic disorders and complex diseases that are polygenetic in   intergenic regions. To elucidate the relationship between SNPs and
                 2
            nature.  In addition to genome sequence variation, epigenetic differ-  phenotypes  of  interest,  initial  efforts  have  concentrated  mainly  on
            ences are increasingly recognized as important for the development of   SNPs  that  are  likely  to  alter  the  function  or  expression  of  a  gene.
            diseases and contribute to differences in the pharmacologic effects of   However,  only  a  small  portion  of  the  identified  SNPs  lie  within
                                                    3
            many medications, referred to as pharmacoepigenomics.  This chapter   coding  regions;  only  about  half  of  those  SNPs  cause  amino  acid
            provides a brief overview of pharmacogenomics and pharmacoepig-  changes  in  expressed  proteins,  and  only  a  subset  of  those  alter  the
            enomics, using selected examples to illustrate its current and potential   function of the encoded protein (“damaging SNPs”). SNPs that cause
            impact on the treatment of hematologic diseases.      amino acid changes are referred to as nonsynonymous SNPs (nsSNPs),
                                                                  and  are  the  main  sequence  variants  underlying  most  of  the  highly
                                                                  penetrant  inherited  monogenic  diseases  currently  known,  such  as
            VARIATION IN THE HUMAN GENOME                         hemoglobinopathies. The likelihood that nsSNPs will result in disease
                                                                  or functional changes in drug metabolism or transport depends on the
            The genome-wide systematic identification of heritable (i.e., germ-  localization and nature of the amino acid change within the encoded
            line) and acquired (i.e., somatic) variants, and the functional analysis   protein; software algorithms have been developed to “predict” whether
            of genes, their variants, their expression, and their related products   a certain amino acid change is likely to have a major or minor effect
            (i.e., proteins) have revolutionized the study of many diseases, the   on protein function (i.e., “damaging” versus “non-damaging”).
            development  of  new  medications,  and  the  optimization  of  drug   Although it is intuitively obvious that amino acid substitutions
            therapy. Genomics increasingly enable clinicians to make intelligent   have the potential to change the function of a protein, gene expres-
            and reliable assessments of a person’s risk for acquiring a particular   sion also can be affected by SNPs positioned in regulatory sequences
            disease, to identify drug targets, and to explain interindividual differ-  or  intronic  regions.  For  example,  a  “silent”  or  synonymous  SNP
            ences in the effectiveness and toxicity of medications. 2  has been identified that affects protein folding and function of an
              The Human Genome Project and subsequent projects such as the   important drug transporter, namely ATP-binding cassette transporter
            International HapMap Project, the 1000 Genomes Project, and the   ABCB1,  and  this  variant  has  the  potential  to  influence  the  intra-
            ENCODE  Project  have  unveiled  many  types  of  variations  within   cellular  accumulation  of  drugs  that  are  substrates  for  ABCB1  (a
                                                                                    4
            the 3 billion base pairs (bp) of the human haploid genome (Table   transporter  out  of  cells).   Moreover,  SNPs  in  the  promoter  region
            8.1); the spectrum ranges from single-base-pair differences to large   can alter the regulatory promoter function and the gene’s expression,
            chromosome events. Variations encompass SNPs, insertions or dele-  thereby  influencing  drug  effects.  Using  a  genome-wide  association
            tions of chromosomal DNA, and structural variants (SVs; genomic   study  (GWAS),  the  rs924607 TT  polymorphism  in  the  promoter

                                                                                                                  79
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113