Page 1094 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 1094

969.e8  Part VII  Hematologic Malignancies


        325.  Wimazal  F,  Sperr  WR,  Kundi  M,  et al:  Prognostic  value  of  lactate   345.  Kulasekararaj AG, Jiang J, Smith AE, et al: Somatic mutations identify
            dehydrogenase activity in myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk Res 25(4):  a subgroup of aplastic anemia patients who progress to myelodysplastic
            287–294, 2001.                                        syndrome. Blood 124(17):2698–2704, 2014.
        326.  Economopoulos T,  Economidou  J,  Giannopoulos  G,  et al:  Immune   346.  Iwanaga M, Furukawa K, Amenomori T, et al: Paroxysmal nocturnal
            abnormalities in myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Pathol 38(8):908–  haemoglobinuria clones in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Br
            911, 1985.                                            J Haematol 102(2):465–474, 1998.
        327.  Mufti GJ, Figes A, Hamblin TJ, et al: Immunological abnormalities in   347.  Sokol L, Loughran TP: Large granular lymphocyte leukemia. Oncologist
            myelodysplastic syndromes. I. Serum immunoglobulins and autoanti-  11(3):263–273, 2006.
            bodies. Br J Haematol 63(1):143–147, 1986.        348.  Lane  AA,  Odejide  O,  Kopp  N,  et al:  Low  frequency  clonal  muta-
        328.  Senent  L,  Arenillas  L,  Luño  E,  et al:  Reproducibility  of  the  World   tions recoverable by deep sequencing in patients with aplastic anemia.
            Health  Organization  2008  criteria  for  myelodysplastic  syndromes.   Leukemia 27(4):968–971, 2013.
            Haematologica 98(4):568–575, 2013.                349.  Yoshizato T, Dumitriu B, Hosokawa K, et al: Somatic mutations and
        329.  Font P, Loscertales J, Benavente C, et al: Inter-observer variance with   clonal hematopoiesis in aplastic anemia. N Engl J Med 373(1):35–47,
            the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) following the 2008   2015.
            WHO classification. Ann Hematol 92(1):19–24, 2013.  350.  Koskela HLM, Eldfors S, Ellonen P, et al: Somatic STAT3 mutations in
        330.  Greenberg  P,  Cox  C,  LeBeau  MM,  et al:  International  scoring   large granular lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 366(20):1905–1913,
            system for  evaluating  prognosis  in  myelodysplastic  syndromes. Blood   2012.
            89(6):2079–2088, 1997.                            351.  Ohyashiki  K,  Sasao  I,  Ohyashiki  JH,  et al:  Clinical  and  cytogenetic
        331.  Greenberg  PL,  Tuechler  H,  Schanz  J,  et al:  Revised  international   characteristics of myelodysplastic syndromes developing myelofibrosis.
            prognostic  scoring  system  for  myelodysplastic  syndromes.  Blood   Cancer 68(1):178–183, 1991.
            120(12):2454–2465, 2012.                          352.  Rumi  E,  Pietra  D,  Pascutto  C,  et al:  Clinical  effect  of  driver  muta-
        332.  Kantarjian  H,  O’Brien  S,  Ravandi  F,  et al:  Proposal  for  a  new  risk   tions  of  JAK2,  CALR,  or  MPL  in  primary  myelofibrosis.  Blood
            model in myelodysplastic syndrome that accounts for events not con-  124(7):1062–1069, 2014.
            sidered in the original International Prognostic Scoring System. Cancer   353.  Zhang S-J, Rampal R, Manshouri T, et al: Genetic analysis of patients
            113(6):1351–1361, 2008.                               with leukemic transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasms shows
        333.  Garcia-Manero G, Shan J, Faderl S, et al: A prognostic score for patients   recurrent SRSF2 mutations that are associated with adverse outcome.
            with lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia 22(3):538–543,   Blood 119(19):4480–4485, 2012.
            2008.                                             354.  Kantarjian  HM,  Keating  MJ,  Walters  RS,  et al:  Therapy-related
        334.  Malcovati L, Della Porta MG, Strupp C, et al: Impact of the degree of   leukemia  and  myelodysplastic  syndrome:  clinical,  cytogenetic,  and
            anemia on the outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and   prognostic features. J Clin Oncol 4(12):1748–1757, 1986.
            its integration into the WHO classification-based Prognostic Scoring   355.  Tallman MS, Gray R, Bennett JM, et al: Leukemogenic potential of adju-
            System (WPSS). Haematologica 96(10):1433–1440, 2011.  vant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: the Eastern Cooperative
        335.  Voso MT, Fenu S, Latagliata R, et al: Revised International Prognostic   Oncology Group experience. J Clin Oncol 13(7):1557–1563, 1995.
            Scoring  System  (IPSS)  predicts  survival  and  leukemic  evolution  of   356.  Smith  RE,  Bryant  J,  DeCillis  A,  et al:  Acute  myeloid  leukemia  and
            myelodysplastic syndromes significantly better than IPSS and WHO   myelodysplastic  syndrome  after  doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide  adju-
            Prognostic Scoring System: validation by the Gruppo Romano Mielo-  vant therapy for operable breast cancer: the National Surgical Adjuvant
            displasie Italian Regional Database. J Clin Oncol 31(21):2671–2677,   Breast and Bowel Project Experience. J Clin Oncol 21(7):1195–1204,
            2013.                                                 2003.
        336.  Neukirchen  J,  Lauseker  M,  Blum  S,  et al:  Validation  of  the  revised   357.  Darrington DL, Vose JM, Anderson JR, et al: Incidence and character-
            international  prognostic  scoring  system  (IPSS-R)  in  patients  with   ization of secondary myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myelogenous
            myelodysplastic syndrome: a multicenter study. Leuk Res 38(1):57–64,   leukemia following high-dose chemoradiotherapy and autologous stem-
            2014.                                                 cell transplantation for lymphoid malignancies. J Clin Oncol 12(12):
        337.  Zeidan AM, Lee J-W, Prebet T, et al: Comparison of the prognostic   2527–2534, 1994.
            utility of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System and the   358.  Friedberg JW, Neuberg D, Stone RM, et al: Outcome in patients with
            French Prognostic Scoring System in azacitidine-treated patients with   myelodysplastic syndrome after autologous bone marrow transplanta-
            myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol 166(3):352–359, 2014.  tion for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 17(10):3128–3135,
        338.  Della Porta MG, Alessandrino EP, Bacigalupo A, et al: Predictive factors   1999.
            for the outcome of allogeneic transplantation in patients with MDS   359.  Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Kumar SK, et al: Second primary malignancies
            stratified according to the revised IPSS-R. Blood 123(15):2333–2342,   with  lenalidomide  therapy  for  newly  diagnosed  myeloma:  a  meta-
            2014.                                                 analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 15(3):333–342, 2014.
        339.  Komrokji RS, Corrales-Yepez M, Al Ali N, et al: Validation of the MD   360.  Andersen MK, Christiansen DH, Pedersen-Bjergaard J: Centromeric
            Anderson  Prognostic  Risk  Model  for  patients  with  myelodysplastic   breakage  and  highly  rearranged  chromosome  derivatives  associated
            syndrome. Cancer 118(10):2659–2664, 2012.             with  mutations  of  TP53  are  common  in  therapy-related  MDS  and
        340.  van Spronsen MF, Ossenkoppele GJ, Holman R, et al: Improved risk   AML  after  therapy  with  alkylating  agents:  an  M-FISH  study.  Genes
            stratification by the integration of the revised international prognostic   Chromosomes Cancer 42(4):358–371, 2005.
            scoring system with the myelodysplastic syndromes comorbidity index.   361.  Pedersen-Bjergaard J: Radiotherapy- and chemotherapy-induced myelo-
            Eur J Cancer 1990 50(18):3198–3205, 2014.             dysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia. A review. Leuk Res 16(1):61–65,
        341.  Malcovati L, Germing U, Kuendgen A, et al: Time-dependent prog-  1992.
            nostic scoring system for predicting survival and leukemic evolution in   362.  Mistry AR, Felix CA, Whitmarsh RJ, et al: DNA topoisomerase II in
            myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol 25(23):3503–3510, 2007.  therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 352(15):
        342.  Della Porta MG, Tuechler H, Malcovati L, et al: Validation of WHO   1529–1538, 2005.
            classification-based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS) for myelodys-  363.  Smith SM, Le Beau MM, Huo D, et al: Clinical-cytogenetic associa-
            plastic syndromes and comparison with the revised International Prog-  tions in 306 patients with therapy-related myelodysplasia and myeloid
            nostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). A study of the International Working   leukemia: the University of Chicago series. Blood 102(1):43–52, 2003.
            Group for Prognosis in Myelodysplasia (IWG-PM). Leukemia 2015.  364.  Fukumoto JS, Greenberg PL: Management of patients with higher risk
        343.  Van den Berghe H, Cassiman JJ, David G, et al: Distinct haematologi-  myelodysplastic  syndromes.  Crit  Rev  Oncol  Hematol  56(2):179–192,
            cal disorder with deletion of long arm of no. 5 chromosome. Nature   2005.
            251(5474):437–438, 1974.                          365.  Abruzzese E, Radford JE, Miller JS, et al: Detection of abnormal pre-
        344.  Sokal G, Michaux JL, Van Den Berghe H, et al: A new hematologic   transplant clones in progenitor cells of patients who developed myelo-
            syndrome  with  a  distinct  karyotype:  the  5  q–chromosome.  Blood   dysplasia  after  autologous  transplantation.  Blood  94(5):1814–1819,
            46(4):519–533, 1975.                                  1999.
   1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099