Page 1742 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 1742

Chapter 97  Graft Engineering and Cell Processing  1547


            the use of DCs pulsed with a tumor-associated antigen preparation   FACT-JACIE International Standards for Cellular Therapy Product Collec-
            and  the  use  of  the  entire  tumor  cells  as  an  immunogen,  either   tion:  Processing  and  Administration.  Foundation  for  Accreditation  of
            unmodified or transduced with immunostimulatory genes, aimed at   Cellular Therapy, Omaha, NE.
            eliciting a broad-based, robust immune response.      NetCord-FACT International Standards for Cord Blood Collection, Process-
              From the manufacturing perspective, the autologous product is   ing, and Release for Administration, Omaha, NE.
            much more of a challenge because a stable tumor cell line must be
            isolated from each patient. This can be an extremely difficult process.
            Many isolated lines do not expand well in culture, or they change   FDA REGULATIONS: CGMP AND CGTP
            phenotype over time. In some patients, the line cannot be generated;
            other patients progress clinically before the vaccine is available and   cGMP  in  Manufacturing,  Processing,  Packing,  or  Holding  of  Drugs  and
            are excluded from the study. As a result, the autologous approach   Finished  Pharmaceuticals.  Code  of  Federal  Regulations Title  21,  Parts
            has a relatively high “failure rate”. The allogeneic cell line approach   210 and 211.
            is technically easier because a line is selected before the study and   Human  Cells,  Tissues,  and  Cellular  and  Tissue  Based  Products.  Code  of
            can  be  used  as  the  generic  immunogen. This  line  must  be  tested   Federal Regulations Title 21, Part 1271.
            extensively  for  infectious  agents  and  should  pass  the  FDA  testing
            criteria  for  Master  and  Working  Cell  Banks.  Currently,  testing  of
            this  type  costs  $100,000–200,000  for  each  line.  Scientifically,  the   FDA GUIDANCES ON CELLULAR AND GENE THERAPY
            drawback  is  that  the  selected  line  may  not  adequately  express  the
            antigen or range of antigens present on each patient’s tumor. In addi-  Guidance for FDA Reviewers and Sponsors: Content and Review of Chem-
            tion, the choice of immunostimulatory molecules that are expressed   istry,  Manufacturing,  and  Control  (CMC)  Information  for  Human
            or enhanced by transduction of the cell line may not be those that   Somatic  Cell Therapy  Investigational  New  Drug  Applications  (INDs).
            would most effectively evoke an immune response. These products   U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Admin-
            are relatively expensive to produce, involving not only the costs of   istration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, April 2008.
            testing the tumor cell line, but also the expense of manufacturing   Guidance  for  Industry:  CGMP  for  Phase  1  Investigational  Drugs.  U.S.
            and  testing  the  vectors  used  for  transduction.  However,  these  are   Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administra-
            one-time costs because the same vaccine is used for all patients in the    tion, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, July 2008.
            study.                                                Guidance for Industry: Considerations for the Design of Early-Phase Clini-
              Release testing involves testing for sterility, endotoxin, and myco-  cal Trials of Cellular and Gene Therapy Products. U.S. Department of
            plasma, with immunophenotyping of the cells and some form of test   Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for
            demonstrating that the line has been effectively transduced (e.g., flow   Biologics Evaluation and Research, June 2015.
            cytometry  for  CD40  ligand  and  IL-2  production  in  the  examples
            described earlier). Because the product will be stored cryopreserved
            over the course of the study and thawed for administration to each   GMP FACILITIES AND PRODUCT MANUFACTURING
            patient,  the  requirement  for  an  ongoing  stability  study  should  be
            anticipated.                                          Cell therapy – cGMP facilities and manufacturing. Gee AP, editor: New York,
                                                                    NY, 2009, Springer.
                                                                  Cellular  therapy:  principles,  methods,  and  regulations.  Areman  E,  editor:
            FUTURE DIRECTIONS                                       Bethesda, MD, 2009, AABB.

            The  science  and  practice  of  hematopoietic  transplantation  has
            expanded  dramatically  over  the  past  10  years  and  has  stimulated   SPECIFIC CELL TYPES: CURRENT REVIEWS
            entirely new areas of medicine. New sources of stem cells have been
            discovered that have expanded the availability of grafts and provided
            new  insights  into  stem  cell  biology.  An  improved  understanding
            of  the  immunology  of  transplantation  and  immune  responses  to   OVERVIEW
            malignancies has led to more sophisticated methods to manipulate
            the  hematopoietic  graft  and  the  immune  system  in  the  recipient   June CH, Riddell SR, Schumacher TN: Adoptive cellular therapy: a race to
            to  produce  more  favorable  outcomes. The  ability  to  target T  cells   the finish line. Sci Transl Med 7(280):280ps7, 2015.
            to  residual  disease  by  genetic  modification  of  the  cells  to  express   Kongtim P, Lee DA, Cooper LJ, et al: Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem
            chimeric  antigen  receptors  has  produced  promising  results  that   Cell  Transplantation  as  a  Platform  for  Post-Transplantation  Cellular
            have  reinvigorated  prospects  for  effective  immunotherapy  of     Therapy. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 21(10):1714–1720, 2015.
            cancer.                                               Melero I, Berman DM, Aznar MA, et al: Evolving synergisitic combinations
              In parallel, the regulatory situation has become clearer and we are   of targeted immunotherapies to combat cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 15:457,
            starting to see widespread development of commercial reagents and   2015.
            devices  that  facilitate  easier  compliance  when  manufacturing  cell   Themeli M, Riviere I, Sadelain M: New cell sources for T cell engineering
            products.                                               and adoptive immunotherapy. Cell Stem Cell 16(4):357–3566, 2015.
              These advances in knowledge coupled to development in technol-
            ogy promise a bright future for engineering specific cell populations
            to provide targeted therapies.                        MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS
                                                                  Luk  F,  de Witte  SF,  Bramer WM,  et al:  Efficacy  of  Immunotherapy  with
            SUGGESTED READINGS                                      mesenchymal  stem  cells  in  man:  a  systematic  review.  Expert  Rev  Clin
                                                                    Immunol 11:617, 2015.

            PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR CELLULAR THERAPY           DENDRITIC CELLS

            AABB Standards for Cellular Therapy Services, AABB, Bethesda, MD.  Atta J, Berk E, Cintolo JA, et al: Rationale for a multimodality strategy to
            FACT Common Standards for Cellular Therapy. Foundation for Accredita-  enhance the efficacy of cell based cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol
              tion of Cellular Therapy, Omaha, NE.                  2:271, 2015.
   1737   1738   1739   1740   1741   1742   1743   1744   1745   1746   1747