Page 1815 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 1815

C H A P T E R  106 


                            HAPLOIDENTICAL HEMATOPOIETIC CELL TRANSPLANTATION


                                                                                                  Ephraim Fuchs




            Allogeneic  hematopoietic  stem  cell  transplant  (alloHSCT)  is  a   recipient and differs by a number of HLA genes on the unshared
            potentially  effective  treatment  for  a  wide  range  of  hematologic   HLA haplotype. When typing is performed for three HLA class I
            malignancies and nonmalignant hematologic or immunologic disor-  genes, HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C, and three class II genes, HLA-
            ders. Sources of donor stem cells for alloHSCT include human leu-  DRB1, HLA-DQB1, and HLA-DPB1, HLA disparity between the
            kocyte  antigen  (HLA)-matched  siblings,  suitably  HLA-matched   HLA-haploidentical donor and recipient ranges from 0 to 6 alleles
            unrelated adult donors, partially HLA-mismatched unrelated donors,   or antigens. By definition, a parent and a child are HLA haploidenti-
            related or unrelated donor umbilical cord blood, or partially HLA-  cal  to  each  other,  and  each  biological  sibling  or  half-sibling  of  a
            mismatched related (HLA-haploidentical [“haplo”]) donors. Histori-  patient has a 50% chance of being HLA haploidentical to each other.
            cally, the paramount consideration in choosing between graft sources   Other  potential  haplo  donors  include  aunts,  uncles,  nieces,  and
            has been the degree of HLA match between donor and recipient. A   nephews, who each have a 50% chance of being HLA haploidentical,
            fully HLA-matched sibling has been the preferred donor for alloHSCT   and cousins, who have a 25% chance of being HLA haploidentical.
            because transplants from HLA-matched siblings have been associated   Mismatching of HLA alleles or antigens can occur in the graft-
            with  the  lowest  incidence  of  graft  failure,  graft-versus-host  disease   versus-host  (GVH)  direction  only,  the  host-versus-graft  (HVG)
            (GVHD),  and  nonrelapse  mortality  (NRM),  as  well  as  with  the   direction only, or bidirectionally. When the donor is homozygous for
            highest overall survival (OS) and event-free survival. Unfortunately,   an HLA allele but the recipient is heterozygous at the same genetic
            only 30% of patients referred for alloHSCT have an HLA-matched   locus, there is a mismatch in the GVH direction only. Conversely,
            sibling, and the availability of closely matched unrelated donors varies   when the recipient is homozygous for an HLA allele but the donor
            significantly by patient ethnicity, being as low as 19% for African   is heterozygous, there is a mismatch in the HVG direction only. HLA
            Americans or as high as 80% for white people of Northern European   mismatches in the GVH direction stimulate GVHD, whereas HLA
                 1
            origin.  HLA mismatching between donor and recipient is associated   mismatches in the HVG direction stimulate rejection of the hema-
            with increased alloreactivity of donor and recipient T cells, leading   topoietic stem cell (HSC) graft by host T cells. The number of HLA
            to higher risks of GVHD and NRM, as well as to worse outcomes.   mismatches  between  an  HLA-haploidentical  donor  and  recipient
            In the past two decades, techniques have been developed to mitigate   should  be  expressed  as  the  number  of  mismatches  in  the  GVH
            alloreactivity to the point that outcomes of HLA-haploidentical stem   direction as well as the number of mismatches in the HVG direction.
            cell transplant (SCT) rival those of umbilical cord blood and unre-  For example, the patient in Fig. 106.1 differs from sibling 2 by four
            lated donor (URD) transplants. This chapter starts by defining what   antigens (and alleles) in the GVH direction and by five antigens (and
            is an HLA-haploidentical donor and presents the immunobiology of   alleles) in the HVG direction, and from sibling 3 by three antigens
            the  immune  response  to  allogeneic  HLA  molecules.  A  history  of   (versus  four  alleles)  in  the  GVH  direction  and  by  three  antigens
            HLA-haploidentical  hematopoietic  cell  transplantation  (HCT)  is   (versus five alleles) in the HVG direction.
            provided, culminating in a presentation of modern approaches and
            results. Finally, considerations that are unique to or enabled by HLA-
            haploidentical HCT are discussed.                     WHY HLA-HAPLOIDENTICAL BONE MARROW 
                                                                  TRANSPLANT? (see Box 106.1)
            DEFINITIONS: WHAT IS AN HLA HAPLOTYPE, AND WHO        Advantages and Limitations of Haploidentical Donors
            IS AN HLA-HAPLOIDENTICAL DONOR?
                                                                  The major advantages of the HLA-haploidentical donor option over
            A haplotype is a set of genes that are arranged closely together on a   the other donor types include:
            chromosome and are inherited as a biologic unit. The HLA locus on
            chromosome 6p13.2 comprises a set of tightly linked genes encoding   1.  Near-universal availability of highly motivated donors: Patients have
            molecules that present peptide antigens to T cells. The HLA locus   an  average  of  2.7  potential  HLA-haploidentical  donors  among
            contains three regions:                                 first-degree relatives. By comparison, only approximately 30% of
                                                                    patients have an HLA-matched sibling, and availability of a URD
            1.  The class I region encodes the “classical” class I genes HLA-A,   genotypically matched at eight of eight alleles (HLA-A, HLA-B,
                                                      +
              HLA-B, and HLA-C, which present antigens to CD8  T cells, as   HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1) ranges from 19% to 80%, depending
              well as nonclassical HLA-E, HLA-F, and HLA-G molecules.  on the recipient’s ethnic background. 1
            2.  The class II region encodes HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQB1, and HLA-  2.  Rapid  availability: The  time  to  identify  and  mobilize  an  adult
                                          +
              DPB1, which present antigens to CD4  T cells, as well as nonclas-  URD can be longer than 3 months for up to 25% of patients. An
              sical class II molecules HLA-DM and HLA-DO.           HLA-haploidentical donor can be identified and mobilized within
            3.  The class III region encodes molecules not known to be involved   2 weeks to 1 month.
              in histocompatibility reactions.                    3.  Adequate doses of HSCs: HLA-haploidentical grafts have sufficient
                                                                    doses of HSCs for transplant of adult recipients and of memory
            An HLA haplotype is defined as the set of histocompatibility genes   T cells for immune reconstitution. In contrast, the total dose of
            that are on the same chromosome 6 and so are inherited together.   nucleated  cells  in  a  single  umbilical  cord  blood  unit  may  be
            Each individual has two HLA haplotypes, one on the chromosome   suboptimal for engraftment in larger adults, leading to delayed
            6 inherited from the individual’s mother and the other on the chro-  immune reconstitution.
            mosome 6 inherited from the individual’s father.      4.  Low cost of graft acquisition: The costs of acquiring grafts from
              An HLA-haploidentical donor is a related donor who shares, by   adult URDs and especially from umbilical cord blood banks can
            common inheritance, exactly one HLA haplotype with the transplant   be substantially higher than acquiring them from related donors.

                                                                                                                1617
   1810   1811   1812   1813   1814   1815   1816   1817   1818   1819   1820