Page 1867 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 1867

Chapter 108  Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Graft-Versus-Leukemia Responses  1659


            are principal cellular targets of GVHD in the GI tract, where intes-  prodrug of mycophenolic acid (MPA), a selective inhibitor of inosine
            tinal flora are critical for amplification of GVHD damage. ISCs are   monophosphate dehydrogenase, an enzyme critical to the de novo
            protected  by  antibacterial  proteins  such  as  REG3α  secreted  by   synthesis  of  guanosine  nucleotide.  Since  T  lymphocytes  are  more
            neighboring Paneth cells. Mucosal barrier disruption caused by stem   dependent on such synthesis than myeloid or mucosal cells, MPA
            cell  dropout  and  subsequent  lack  of  mucosal  regeneration  may   preferentially inhibits proliferative responses of T cells. 301
            preferentially allow Paneth cell proteins, including REG3α, to tra-  One hypothesis that flows from the three-step model of GVHD
            verse into the bloodstream. Thus the plasma levels of REG3α may   posits that reduction of intestinal colonization with bacteria could
            serve as a “liquid biopsy” and surrogate marker for the cumulative   prevent GVHD. Animal studies in germ-free environments support
            area of these breaches to GI mucosal barrier integrity, a parameter   this notion; GVHD was not observed until mice were colonized with
                                                                                     302
            impossible to measure by individual tissue biopsies.  gram-negative organisms.  Later, gut decontamination and use of a
                                                                  laminar air flow environment was associated with less GVHD and
                                                                                                           303
                                                                  better survival in patients with severe aplastic anemia.  Similarly,
            Prevention of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease         studies of intestinal decontamination in patients with malignancies
                                                                                                             306
                                                                  have shown less GVHD in some, 304,305  but not all studies.  Finally,
            Elimination of T cells with monoclonal antibodies, immunotoxins,   another recent approach to GVHD prevention has been the use of
            lectins, CD34 columns, or physical techniques are effective at reduc-  nonmyeloablative conditioning transplants. Administration of vori-
            ing GVHD. A typical unmanipulated marrow transplant entails the   nostat  in  combination  with  standard  GVHD  prophylaxis  after
                                  7
            infusion of approximately 10  T cells per kg of recipient weight. A   related-donor reduced-intensity conditioning hemopoietic stem-cell
                                      5
            T-cell dose less than or equal to 10  per kg has been associated with   transplantation reduced cumulative incidence of grade II–IV acute
                                  41
            complete  control  of  GVHD.   More  recently,  the  combination  of   GVHD by day 100 to 22%, lower than the expected incidence of
                                                4
                                                                                 172
            very high stem cell numbers and less than 3 × 10  CD3 cells per kg   severe acute GVHD.  A less intensive preparative regimen decreases
                                                      284
            allowed haploidentical transplantation without GVHD.  Presum-  the  tissue  toxicity  and  subsequent  release  of  cytokines  in  animal
            ably  host  immune  cells  that  survive  the  initial  conditioning  are   models. 79,82  Patients generally experience mild toxicity in the initial
            responsible for graft rejection. When the stem cell source contains   peritransplant period and develop little or no GVHD, although many
            large  numbers  of  T  cells,  the  GVH  reaction  further  reduces  the   develop GVHD later, especially after donor lymphocyte infusions. In
            residual  population  capable  of  alloreactivity,  thus  decreasing  graft   fact,  the  rates  of  GVHD  are  often  higher  than  with  conventional
            rejection. To some degree, the higher graft failure rates may be con-  transplants, and GVHD is associated with a significant portion of
            trolled by increasing the intensity of the immunosuppression of the   the GVL effect. 307–309
                                                  287
            conditioning regimen, 285,286  or adding back T cells.  Overall there   A recent study has shown that addition of one dose of a human-
            has been no improvement in survival that can be definitively attrib-  ized  anti–IL-6  monoclonal  antibody  (tocilizumab)  in  addition  to
            uted to T-cell depletion.                             standard cyclosporine methotrexate prophylaxis resulted in only 12%
              Treatment of established GVHD with specific T-cell antibodies   Grade II–IV acute GVHD in 48 patients. 310,311  An important role for
            has  produced  mixed  results.  Although  antithymocyte  globulin  has   TNF-α  in  clinical  acute  GVHD  has  been  suggested  by  studies
            definite activity in established GVHD, the nonspecific clearance of   demonstrating elevated levels of TNF-α in the serum of patients with
            T  cells  may  result  in  increased  opportunistic  infections  and  no   acute GVHD and other endothelial complications such as venooc-
            improvement in survival. More specific therapy with the humanized   clusive disease. 312–315  Therapy of GVHD with humanized anti-TNF-α
            anti–IL-2 receptor antibody, daclizumab 288,289  or the humanized anti-  (infliximab) 316,317  or a dimeric fusion protein consisting of the extra-
            CD3 antibody, visilizumab 290,291  are promising, since they offer the   cellular  ligand-binding  portion  of  the  human  TNF-α  receptor
            potential of selectively removing the activated T cells. However, an   (TNFR)  linked  to  the  Fc  portion  of  human  immunoglobulin  G1
                                                                           318
            increased risk for infection may still be observed. 292  (etanercept)   have  shown  some  promise. 319,320  The  second  major
              The first generally prescribed GVHD preventive regimen was the   proinflammatory cytokine that appears to play an important role in
            administration of intermittent low-dose methotrexate as developed   the effector phase of acute GVHD is IL-1. Secretion of IL-1 appears
                                           293
            in  a  dog  model  by  Thomas  and  Storb.   The  principle  of  this   to occur predominantly during the effector phase of GVHD in the
                                                                                                         269
            approach  was  to  administer  a  cell  cycle–specific  chemotherapeutic   spleen  and  skin,  two  major  GVHD  target  organs.   IL-1RA  is  a
            agent immediately after the transplant, when the T cells have started   naturally occurring pure competitive inhibitor of IL-1 that is pro-
            to  divide  after  exposure  to  allogeneic  antigens.  Subsequently,  the   duced  by  monocytes/macrophages and  keratinocytes.  Of note, the
            addition of antithymocyte globulin, prednisone, or both resulted in   IL-1RA gene is polymorphic, and the presence in the donor of the
            incremental improvement in the GVHD rate but no improvement   allele that is linked to higher secretion of IL-1RA was associated with
                                                                                321
            in survival. 294,295  Ultimately, the course of methotrexate was abbrevi-  less  acute  GVHD.  Two-phase  I/II  trials  showed  promising  data
            ated and combined with a T-cell activation inhibitor, such as cyclo-  that specific inhibition of IL-1 with either the soluble receptor or
            sporine or tacrolimus. The introduction of cyclosporine in the late   IL-1RA could result in remissions in 50% to 60% of patients with
            1970s  was  a  significant  advance  in  GVHD  prevention.  A  similar   steroid-resistant  GVHD. 322,323   However,  a  subsequent  randomized
            agent,  tacrolimus,  has  been  shown  to  provide  similar  control  of   trial  of  the  addition  of  IL-1RA  or  placebo  to  cyclosporine  and
                  296
            GVHD.  As a single agent, cyclosporine was about as effective as   methotrexate beginning at the time of conditioning and continuing
                      297
            methotrexate.  However, in combination with methotrexate, there   through day 14 after stem cell infusion did not show any protective
            was  a  significant  reduction  in  the  incidence  of  GVHD  and  an   effect  of  the  drug,  despite  the  attainment  of  very  high  plasma
                               298
            improvement  in  survival.   Subsequent  trials  of  tacrolimus  and   levels. 271,324   Therefore,  at  least  as  administered  in  this  study,  IL-1
            methotrexate compared with cyclosporine and methotrexate showed   inhibition was insufficient to prevent GVHD in humans. IL-11 was
                                       296
            no advantage for either combination.  The addition of prednisone   also  able  to  protect  the  GI  tract  in  animal  models  and  prevent
                                                                                                        324
            to  the  conventional  two-drug  regimen  resulted  in  similar  rates  of   GVHD,  but  it  did  not  prevent  clinical  GVHD.   Thus  not  all
            GVHD and no improvement in survival. 299              preclinical strategies successfully translate to new therapies.
              Sirolimus (rapamycin) is a macrocyclic lactone immunosuppres-
            sant that is similar in structure to tacrolimus and cyclosporine. All
            three drugs bind to immunophilins; however, sirolimus complexed   Therapy for Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease
            with FKBP12 inhibits T-cell proliferation by interfering with signal
                                                            300
            transduction and cell-cycle progression and can prevent GVHD.    Glucocorticoid steroids are the initial therapy for acute GVHD. The
            Because  Sirolimus  acts  through  a  separate  mechanism  from  the   mechanisms by which steroids work are multifactorial; they act as
            tacrolimus-FKBP complex (and cyclosporine-cyclophilin complex),   lympholytic agents and inhibit the release of inflammatory cytokines
            it may be synergistic with both tacrolimus and cyclosporine. More   such as IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, gamma interferon, and TNF-α. Because of
            recently, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been studied. It is the   its  intravenous  availability,  methylprednisolone  is  the  steroid  most
   1862   1863   1864   1865   1866   1867   1868   1869   1870   1871   1872