Page 2346 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 2346

C H A P T E R        141 

           THE ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME


           Jacob H. Rand and Lucia R. Wolgast




        The  antiphospholipid  (aPL)  syndrome  (APS)  is  an  autoimmune   CCP domains, each consisting of about 60 amino acids, with a fifth
        thrombophilic condition that is defined by a combination of clinical   domain that includes a phospholipid binding site near the carboxy-
        and laboratory criteria. This chapter reviews the current understand-  terminus of the protein. Binding of β 2GPI to membranes that express
        ing  of  aPL-mediated  pathogenic  mechanisms,  diagnostic  tests  for    anionic phospholipids occurs via the affinity of cationic residues near
        the  condition,  its  clinical  manifestations,  and  current  treatment   the carboxy-terminus for anionic polar heads of phospholipids that
        approaches.                                           adjoin a hydrophobic loop that inserts into the lipid bilayer. Although
                                                              patients with APS have been described to have antibodies that rec-
                                                              ognize all of the five domains of β 2 GPI, IgG antibodies against an
        DEFINITION OF ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME               epitope on domain I comprising Gly40-Arg43 has been particularly
                                                              correlated  with  an  increased  risk  for  thrombosis;  this  domain  I
        APS is an autoimmune thrombophilic condition in which patients   epitope is cryptic in the circulating protein and becomes exposed after
        have  circulating  antibodies  against  plasma  proteins  that  bind  to   β 2 GPI binds to phospholipid bilayers. The specific conformation of
        phospholipids. The precise mechanism(s) by which these autoanti-  the unbound form of β 2 GPI is not entirely clear; transmission elec-
        bodies  cause  disease  has  (have)  not  yet  been  precisely  established.   tron microscopy of negatively stained β 2 GPI molecules indicates that
        Investigational diagnostic criteria (referred to as the Sydney Criteria),   the unbound protein has a circular conformation that was attributed
        detailed in Table 141.1, have been formulated to provide consistency   to the affinity of its carboxy-terminus domain (domain V) for the
        for clinical trials. These require that patients have documented evi-  protein’s amino-terminus domain, whereas β 2 GPI bound to phospho-
        dence of vascular thrombosis and/or obstetric complications attribut-  lipid has a “J-shaped” conformation with the binding site for phos-
        able to placental vascular insufficiency; the latter include otherwise   pholipid near the carboxy-terminus of the J. On the other hand, small
        unexplained recurrent miscarriages, intrauterine growth restriction,   angle x-ray scattering studies indicate an “S” shape configuration for
        intrauterine fetal demise, preeclampsia/toxemia, placental abruption,   the free form (Fig. 141.1).
        and preterm labor. The laboratory criteria require persistent abnor-
        mality (defined as at least two abnormal measurements at least 12
        weeks apart) of one or more of the aPL assays, which include elevated   Other Antigenic Targets of Antiphospholipid Antibodies
        anticardiolipin  (aCL)  immunoglobulin  (Ig)  G  or  IgM,  antibodies,
        anti–β 2 -glycoprotein  I  (anti-β 2 GPI)  IgG  or  IgM  antibodies  or  an   Besides β 2 GPI, prothrombin (factor II), factor V, protein C, protein
        abnormal lupus anticoagulant (LA).                    S, annexin A2, annexin A5, high- and low-molecular-weight kinino-
           Because  these  criteria  were  intended  to  provide  a  uniformly   gen, heparin, factor VII/VIIa, plasmin, vimentin, and other proteins
        rigorous  definition  of  APS  for  standardizing  clinical  research  and   have been identified as targets for autoantibodies in APS patients.
        not  for  the  diagnosis  of  APS  in  “real  world”  clinical  practice  set-  Antibodies have also been found to bind to sulfatides, acidic glyco-
        tings, some patients may be diagnosed clinically with presumptive   sphingolipids that can interact with sulfatide-binding proteins such
        APS without meeting the strict investigational criteria. For example,   as von Willebrand factor, thrombospondin, and P-selectin.
        some patients with APS have positive results on “noncriteria” clinical
        laboratory  tests  (described  later)  that  have  not  been  included  by
        consensus panels as diagnostic criteria for the disorder. Also, some   PATHOGENIC EFFECTS OF ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID 
        patients present with manifestations that have been associated with   ANTIBODIES
        aPL antibodies that were not included in the investigational criteria.
        These “noncriteria manifestations” include thrombocytopenia, livedo   As  described  later,  numerous  mechanisms  have  been  proposed  to
        reticularis,  skin  ulcers,  nephropathy,  migraine,  cognitive  defects,   explain  the  thrombotic  manifestations  of  APS  (Table  141.3).
        diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, and valvular heart disease (Libman-Sachs     Although  all  of  these  are  based  on  in  vitro  findings  or  on  animal
        endocarditis).                                        models, their in vivo significance in the human disease process remain
           At  the  present  time,  APS  may  be  divided  into  the  following   to be established.
        subcategories: (1) Primary APS is the “stand alone” disorder, in the
        absence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), (2) secondary APS
        occurs in the presence of SLE, (3) catastrophic APS (CAPS), mani-  Antiphospholipid-Mediated Promotion of Tissue  
        fests  as  disseminated  thrombosis  in  large  and  small  vessels  with   Factor Expression
        resulting multiorgan failure (Table 141.2), and (4) SNAPS includes
        patients  whose  diagnostic  tests  are  entirely  negative  but  who,  on   aPL antibodies can bind to, injure, and/or activate cultured vascular
        clinical grounds, are still suspected to have the disorder.  endothelial  cells.  Antibody  binding  to  β 2 GPI  on  the  endothelial
                                                              surface may trigger signaling cascades that promote the expression of
        ANTIGENIC SPECIFICITIES OF ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID           tissue factor and adhesion molecules. There is evidence that annexin
                                                              A2, which forms tetramers with S100 and is an endothelial surface
        ANTIBODIES                                            receptor for tissue plasminogen activator and plasminogen, serves as
                                                              a receptor for β 2GPI on vascular endothelium. Annexin A2 and the
        β 2-Glycoprotein I                                    signaling  coreceptors,  Toll-like  receptor-4  (TLR4)  and  Toll-like
                                                              receptor-2 (TLR2) have been implicated as triggers of the signaling
        β 2 -Glycoprotein I (β 2GPI), a 50-kDa glycoprotein member of the   cascade. Downstream signaling appears to involves TRAF6 (tumor
        complement control protein (CCP) superfamily, is a major antigenic   necrosis  factor  receptor–associated  factor  6)  and  MyD88  (myeloid
        target for aPL antibodies. The protein consists of five homologous   differentiation factor 88). Tissue factor expression is mediated by p38

        2088
   2341   2342   2343   2344   2345   2346   2347   2348   2349   2350   2351