Page 2368 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 2368

2110   Part XII  Hemostasis and Thrombosis


           Warfarin has numerous drug interactions including many com-  considered.  Although  not  formally  evaluated  in  randomized  trials,
        monly administered medications. Noninteracting medications should   this strategy likely reduces the initial risk of bleeding while eliminat-
        be  prescribed  preferentially  in  patients  receiving  warfarin  to  avoid   ing the long-term increased risk of DVT associated with permanent
        adverse  events.  When  noninteracting  medications  are  unavailable,   caval interruption. In contrast, patients who have a persistent major
        increased  frequency  of  INR  monitoring  and  dose  adjustments   risk factor for bleeding may be considered for insertion of a perma-
        enhance  safety.  Warfarin  is  contraindicated  during  pregnancy,  but   nent  IVC  filter  because  the  mortality  rate  associated  with  major
        may be used during breastfeeding.                     bleeding during therapeutic anticoagulation is approximately 20%.
                                                              This  procedure  is  associated  with  a  significant  risk  of  immediate
                                                              worsening  of  leg  symptoms  because  of  blockage  of  the  IVC  by
        Direct Oral Anticoagulants                            thrombus and a long-term increase in the risk of recurrent DVT.
        DOACs that target thrombin (dabigatran) and factor Xa (rivaroxa-
        ban,  apixaban,  edoxaban)  are  available  for  the  treatment  of  acute   Thrombolytic Therapy for Massive  
        VTE. These agents do not require routine anticoagulation monitor-  Pulmonary Embolism
        ing and have fewer interactions with food and drugs compared with
        warfarin. Large phase III clinical trials have demonstrated that dabi-  Thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase, urokinase, or t-Pa is more
        gatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban are noninferior to the   effective  than  UFH  alone  in  correcting  the  angiographic  defects
        combination of LMWH/warfarin for the treatment of acute VTE.   produced by PE, and may be better than UFH in preventing death
        Treatment with LMWH is given for at least 5 days before dabigatran   in patients with massive PE associated with shock. Based on these
        or edoxaban. DOACs should be avoided in patients with severe renal   findings, thrombolytic therapy is the treatment of choice for patients
        impairment  (creatinine  clearance  <30 mL/min)  and  used  with   with massive PE associated with cardiovascular collapse.
        caution in those with weight above 120 kg, body mass index >40 kg/  Bleeding occurs more frequently with thrombolytic therapy than
          2
        m , or active malignancy because of a lack of clinical efficacy and   with UFH. The risk of hemorrhage increases with the duration of
        safety data in these populations.                     thrombolytic infusion and usually occurs at a site of previous surgery
                                                              or trauma. Intracranial hemorrhage occurs in approximately 1% of
                                                              patients  at  risk,  approximately  twice  as  frequently  as  with  UFH
        Duration of Treatment                                 treatment.
        The optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy for treatment of
        VTE is unknown. Patients with VTE provoked by a clear transient   Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for  
        risk factor are generally treated for 3 months. Patients with unpro-  Deep Vein Thrombosis
        voked  (idiopathic)  VTE  should  be  treated  for  a  minimum  of  3
        months, with consideration of extended therapy especially for patients   Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) involves direct injection of a
        at low bleeding risk in whom the clinical benefit of preventing VTE   thrombolytic agent through a catheter into the vein affected by DVT,
        recurrence outweighs the risk of bleeding. Patients with a persistent,   which can also be combined with mechanical thrombus removal. In
        major risk factor for recurrence (e.g., malignancy, immobility) and   a  small  nonblinded  randomized  study,  CDT  reduced  the  risk  of
        patients who prefer to decrease their thrombotic risk should receive   postthrombotic syndrome but not health-related quality of life after
        anticoagulation for longer periods or indefinitely with regular reas-  24 months of follow-up compared with standard therapy. It has not
        sessments of the benefits and risks of ongoing therapy. At this time,   been shown to reduce the risk of PE or mortality, and increases the
        there are no absolute predictors of recurrence, but recurrence appears   risk of bleeding. At present there is insufficient high-quality evidence
        to  be  more  common  in  male  patients  and  those  with  an  elevated   supporting  a  net  clinical  benefit  of  CDT  given  the  bleeding  risk.
        D-dimer assay at or around the time of anticoagulant discontinua-  CDT may be considered at centers with technical expertise in CDT
        tion.  The  relationship  between  residual  venous  obstruction  on   in consultation with a thrombosis expert for select patients presenting
        ultrasound at the completion of initial treatment and recurrence risk   with recent (less than 14 days) iliofemoral DVT with severe symp-
        requires further study.                               toms and low bleeding risk.
           Decisions  regarding  extended  anticoagulant  therapy  should
        incorporate counselling regarding the expected risks and benefits, and
        patient values and preferences. Extended treatment reduces the risk   Thromboendarterectomy for Pulmonary Embolism
        of  recurrent  VTE  by  at  least  80%  with  a  small  increased  risk  of
        bleeding. When prescribing apixaban, a reduced dose (2.5 mg twice   Thromboendarterectomy is effective in selected cases of CTEPH with
        daily) is used for secondary VTE prevention after initial 6 months of   proximal pulmonary arterial obstruction. Urgent pulmonary embo-
        anticoagulant therapy. Low-dose aspirin reduces the risk of recurrence   lectomy is usually reserved for patients with a saddle embolism lodged
        by approximately 30%. However, it is not considered an equivalent   in the main pulmonary artery or for those with massive embolism
        alternative to anticoagulant therapy given the reduced efficacy and   whose  blood  pressure  cannot  be  maintained  despite  thrombolytic
        should be reserved for patients wishing to discontinue anticoagulants   therapy and vasopressor agents. Although this procedure can be suc-
        who have no contraindication to aspirin therapy and/or have another   cessfully performed by experienced surgical teams, in inexperienced
        indication for aspirin.                               hands  it  is  associated  with  high  complication  and  mortality  rates.
                                                              Patients with repeated episodes of PE and significant chronic pulmo-
                                                              nary  hypertension  with  right  ventricular  compromise  should  be
        Inferior Vena Cava Filter                             anticoagulated  and  monitored.  If  pulmonary  pressures  do  not
                                                              decrease, patients should be evaluated for surgical fitness. If deemed
        Anticoagulants are effective in reducing mortality from PE. However,   necessary, thromboendarterectomy should be carried out in centers
        some patients have relative or absolute contraindications to antico-  with expertise with optimal perioperative management, within which
        agulant therapy. In these cases, there may be a role for inferior vena   the likelihood of success of the procedure is high.
        cava (IVC) filters (see Chapter 143). IVC filters do not treat VTE
        but are used to prevent PE in patients with DVT who cannot receive
        adequate anticoagulant therapy. In patients with active bleeding or a   VENOUS THROMBOSIS IN PREGNANCY
        transient risk factor for bleeding (e.g., surgery), insertion of a tem-
        porary IVC filter followed by its removal and subsequent therapeutic   The risk of VTE is increased during pregnancy and the postpartum
        anticoagulation  when  the  bleeding  risk  is  diminished  should  be   period. DVT is more common than PE and affects the left leg in
   2363   2364   2365   2366   2367   2368   2369   2370   2371   2372   2373