Page 854 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 854

Chapter 52  Histiocytic Disorders  737


            intensive  therapy,  and  CNS  involvement.  Long-term  disease-free   unrecognized.  Recent  evidence  suggests  that  mild  subclinical  MAS
            survival after HCT was approximately 50% to 65% before the year   occurs in as many as one-third of patients with active soJIA and may
            2000,  regardless  of  whether  a  matched  sibling  or  closely  matched   be the first manifestation of soJIA. Infections or change in medica-
            unrelated donor was used. Most patients transplanted during that era   tions  may  precede  the  diagnosis  of  MAS;  in  most  patients,  MAS
            succumbed to “transplant-related” complications during the first 100   is  triggered  by  a  flare-up  of  the  underlying  rheumatologic  disease.
            days after infusion. A significant proportion of fatal complications   Published observations suggest that as in HLH, MAS patients have
            involved  inflammatory  conditions  termed  acute  respiratory  distress   profoundly  depressed  NK  cell  function,  sometimes  associated  with
            syndrome, veno-occlusive disease, and multisystem organ failure, unspeci-  abnormal perforin expression, and these abnormalities are associated
            fied. In rare cases, residual HLH was identified at autopsy despite the   with specific perforin and Munc13-4 polymorphisms.
            use of myeloablative conditioning therapy.
              During the past decade, the use of reduced-intensity conditioning
            (RIC) regimens before HCT has been investigated after encouraging   Diagnosis and Treatment
            results from an institutional series. Most cases of RIC pretreatment
            have included alemtuzumab and demonstrated superior early post-  There are no validated diagnostic criteria for MAS, and early diag-
            transplant  survival.  In  a  single-center  analysis  directly  comparing   nosis is often difficult. A recent consensus conference has developed
            HCT outcomes after myeloablative conditioning versus RIC, a sta-  expert-based  classification  criteria  for  MAS,  although  these  have
            tistically significant improvement was observed after RIC condition-  not been validated as diagnostic criteria in clinical trials. Thus, in a
            ing,  with  all  patients  surviving  at  6  months  after  transplant.  At   patient with persistently active underlying rheumatologic disease, a
            present, published data regarding outcome of RIC transplants using   fall in the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and platelet count,
            umbilical cord blood is not sufficient to draw conclusions regarding   particularly in combination with persistently high C-reactive protein
            safety  or  efficacy.  Donor  choice  should  also  take  into  account  the   and increasing levels of ferritin, should raise a suspicion of impending
            possibility of an occult predisposition to HLH in siblings of patients   MAS. The diagnosis of MAS is usually confirmed by the demonstra-
            without  identified  gene  defects.  Much  remains  to  be  learned  and   tion  of  hemophagocytosis  in  the  BM.  Assessment  of  the  levels  of
            refined regarding the optimal application of alemtuzumab as well as   sCD25 and sCD163 in serum may help with the timely diagnosis of
            other agents used before HCT. The timing of pretransplant alemtu-  MAS. Although mild elevation of sCD25 has been reported in many
            zumab  impacts  the  probability  of  graft-versus-host  disease,  mixed   rheumatic diseases, including JIA and SLE, a several-fold increase in
            chimerism, and, in rare cases, rejection. Other factors, such as donor   the levels of sIL2Rα in these diseases is highly suggestive of MAS. The
            source, human leukocyte antigen match, cell dose, and patient condi-  application of the HLH diagnostic criteria to systemic JIA patients
            tion with regard to HLH disease activity at time of conditioning, may   with  suspected  MAS  is  problematic.  Some  of  the  HLH  markers,
            all play roles in determining the likelihood of success after RIC HCT.  such as lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, and hyperferritinemia, are
              Patients with CNS HLH need close posttransplant follow-up. The   common features of active systemic JIA itself and therefore do not
            authors recommend examination of CSF within 100 days of HCT   distinguish  MAS  from  a  conventional  systemic  JIA  flare.  Patients
            even in asymptomatic patients. Follow-up MRIs are recommended if   with systemic JIA often have increased white blood cell and platelet
            pretransplant  abnormalities  were  present.  In  some  patients  with   counts, as well as serum levels of fibrinogen as a part of the inflam-
            mixed or full hematopoietic donor chimerism, HLH disease activity   matory response seen in this disease. Therefore, when they develop
            in the CSF can be effectively treated with intrathecal therapy during   MAS, they reach the degree of cytopenias and hypofibrinogenemia
            the early posttransplant months. CNS disease is subsequently con-  seen in HLH only at the late stages of the syndrome when medical
            trolled as donor immune reconstitution progresses.    management becomes challenging. This is even more problematic for
                                                                  the diagnosis of MAS in patients with SLE in whom autoimmune
                                                                  cytopenias are common and difficult to distinguish from those caused
            Prognosis                                             by MAS.
                                                                    Early  recognition  of  this  syndrome  and  immediate  therapeutic
            Significant strides have been made in the treatment of HLH, with   intervention to produce a rapid response are critical. Prompt admin-
            survival now generally ranging from 50% to 70%. In children with   istration of more aggressive treatment in these patients may, in fact,
            nonfamilial HLH, overall survival has been reported at 72%, but only   prevent development of the full-blown syndrome. To achieve rapid
            20% of the patients did not require HCT. Survival is increased in   reversal of coagulation abnormalities and cytopenias, most clinicians
            children,  irrespective  of  genetic  status,  who  receive  HSCT  from   start with intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy (30 mg/kg
            matched rather than unmatched donors. RIC pretransplant regimens   for 3 consecutive days) followed by 2–3 mg/kg/day divided in four
            appear to further decrease mortality. The best outcomes in HSCT are   doses. After normalization of hematologic abnormalities and resolu-
            seen in children who have a rapid and complete response to pretrans-  tion of coagulopathy, steroids are tapered slowly to avoid relapses of
            plant therapies and who do not exhibit significant neurologic involve-  MAS. Commonly, however, MAS appears to be corticosteroid resis-
            ment. Prompt initiation of HSCT in familial patients after disease   tant, with deaths being reported even among patients treated with
            remission is obtained is also likely to increase survival. Patients with   massive doses of steroids. Parenteral administration of cyclosporine
            significant neurologic involvement may experience severe and perma-  A has been shown to be highly effective in patients with corticosteroid-
            nent sequelae even if they survive.                   resistant  MAS.  The  utility  of  biologic  drugs  in  MAS  treatment
                                                                  remains unclear. Although tumor necrosis factor-inhibiting agents,
                                                                  biologics  that  neutralize  IL-1  and  IL-6,  have  been  reported  to  be
            MACROPHAGE ACTIVATION SYNDROME                        effective in occasional MAS patients, other reports describe patients
                                                                  in whom MAS occurred while they were receiving these agents. Based
            MAS is the name commonly given to a severe, potentially fatal inflam-  on some success with IVIG administration in virus-associated HLH,
            matory condition seen in the context of rheumatologic disorders such   this treatment might be effective in MAS triggered by viral infection.
            as  soJIA  or  systemic  lupus  erythematosus  (SLE). The  syndrome  of   If MAS, however, is driven by EBV infection, rituximab, a monoclo-
            MAS shares many similarities with classic HLH, and many investiga-  nal  antibody  that  depletes  B  lymphocytes  (the  main  type  of  cells
            tors view it as a special form of HLH, suggesting that the name may   harboring the EBV virus) may be considered.
            be changed to rheumatologic HLH (or R-HLH). The main manifesta-
            tions of MAS include fever, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy,
            severe cytopenias, serious liver disease, and coagulopathy consistent   Future Directions
            with DIC. Hemophagocytosis is often (although not always) seen in
            the BM of patients with MAS. The true incidence of MAS may be   As  an  alternative  approach  to  etoposide-based  approaches  for  the
            underestimated because relatively mild cases of MAS often remained   treatment of HLH, ATG–prednisone has been used for a number of
   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859