Page 2270 - Williams Hematology ( PDFDrive )
P. 2270

2244  Part XII:  Hemostasis and Thrombosis                   Chapter 131:  The Antiphospholipid Syndrome             2245




                       310
                  (VTE).  Therapeutic CFX values range from 20 to 40 percent; thus,   of  the  high  mortality.   Treatment for  CAPS  is  directed  toward  the
                                                                                         176
                  a CFX of 40 percent would approximate an INR of 2.0, and a CFX of    thrombotic events and suppression of the cytokine cascade. This
                  20 percent would approximate an INR of 3.0.           includes anticoagulation with heparin and immunosuppressive therapy
                     New  oral  anticoagulants  (NOACs),  either  direct  factor  Xa  or   in the form of high-dose glucocorticoids. A triple therapy strategy of
                                                            311
                  thrombin  inhibitors,  are effective  for  treatment  of  VTE.   However,   anticoagulation, glucocorticoids, and either intravenous immunoglob-
                  their use specifically in APS patients has not been thoroughly evaluated.   ulin or plasma exchange or both has improved outcomes. Cyclophos-
                  In two recent case studies, NOACs have failed to prevent thrombosis in   phamide is recommended for patients with CAPS and inflammatory
                  APS patients. Of six APS patients studied, five suffered recurrent VTE   features of SLE or high-titer aPL antibodies. Rituximab may be useful in
                  and one suffered a recurrent TIA after transitioning to NOACs. 312,313  At   refractory or relapsing cases of CAPS. 178
                  the time of writing, a prospective randomized controlled trial of war-
                  farin versus rivaroxaban named “RAPS” (Rivaroxaban in Antiphos-
                  pholipid Syndrome) is ongoing in patients with thrombotic APS (study   PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS
                  ISRCTN68222801). Until the trial is concluded (expected completion   The current approach to treating pregnant women with APS and recur-
                  in 2015), caution should be applied in using NOACs for APS patients.  rent pregnancy losses or the other aPL antibody–associated complica-
                     Fibrinolytic treatment has been reported for patients with primary   tions of pregnancy includes daily low-dose aspirin (75 to 81 mg/day)
                  APS and extensive thrombosis of the common femoral and iliac veins   and either UFH or LMWH.   300,337,338  Although clinical studies have
                                                            315
                  extending to the lower vena cava,  acute ischemic stroke,  and acute   shown efficacy with UFH, most clinicians treat with LMWH because
                                          314
                  myocardial infarction. 316                            it has a better pharmacokinetic profile and a lower risk of heparin-
                     The antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is associ-  induced thrombocytopenia and osteopenia. Heparin is then withheld
                  ated with reduced risk of thrombosis in patients with APS 271–273,317–319    when labor begins or 24 hours prior to a cesarean section. Anticoagu-
                  and SLE. 319–321  The potential effectiveness of this treatment has been   lation is resumed 6 weeks postpartum because of the increased risk of
                  supported by an animal model for aPL thrombosis  and by a recent   VTE in this time period.  Interestingly, the current standard of care
                                                       322
                                                                                           301
                                                                323
                  report that HCQ directly disrupts aPL IgG–β GPI complexes,  and   for pregnant APS patients is based on two randomized controlled trials
                                                    2
                  also reverses the  aPL antibody-mediated  disruption of  annexin  A5   conducted prior to 2000 that included only 150 patients. Newer trials
                  binding on phospholipid bilayers  and on human placental syncitio-  show conflicting results, with some showing no difference in prevention
                                          324
                  trophoblasts.  In a longitudinal cohort study consisting of 272 patients   of pregnancy loss in APS patients receiving aspirin alone versus aspirin
                           325
                  with the APS and 152 taking HCQ (17 of 272 patients on warfarin, 203   and LMWH,  and others showing a small benefit.  With this manage-
                                                                                                            339
                                                                                  302
                  were on prednisolone, 112 on azathioprine, 38 on aspirin) investigators   ment, the likelihood of a good pregnancy outcome in women with APS
                  found fewer thrombotic complications for patients on HCQ (odds ratio   has been estimated to be approximately 75 to 80 percent.
                                                                 326
                  [OR] 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07 to 0.44; p <0.0001).  In   Other treatment modalities such as glucocorticoids or intravenous
                  asymptomatic aPL antibody-positive patients with SLE, primary pro-  IgG (IVIG) should be considered only for patients who are refractory to
                  phylaxis with aspirin and HCQ appeared to reduce the frequency of   anticoagulant therapy, who have a severe immune thrombocytopenia,
                                327
                  thrombotic events.  A published prospective, nonrandomized study   or who have a significant contraindication to heparin therapy. The addi-
                  compared oral anticoagulant plus HCQ versus oral anticoagulant alone.   tion of glucocorticoids has shown no clear benefits and has been associ-
                  In this study, 30 percent (6/20) of patients had a thrombotic event if they   ated with premature rupture of membranes or preeclampsia; however, a
                  were on oral anticoagulant alone, despite therapeutic range INR, versus   newer study showed that for patients with refractory APS, the addition
                  no thrombotic events in the oral anticoagulant plus HCQ group (0/20).   of low-dose prednisolone (10 mg) from time of a positive pregnancy
                  This study, however, was limited given the small number of patients   test up to 14 weeks’ gestation may help to increase livebirth rates.
                                                                                                                          340
                                      328
                  studied and short followup.  Recently, the natural 4-aminoquinolone,   Although the addition of IVIG has not been shown to be superior to
                  quinine, was shown in vitro to disrupt the immune complexes bound   heparin and aspirin in large multicenter clinical trials,  it has shown
                                                                                                                341
                                  329
                  to phospholipid layers.  However, both HCQ and quinine will require   some efficacy in patients with refractory APS in small case studies. 342,343
                  clinical testing in appropriately designed clinical trials. A prospective
                  randomized controlled trial comparing HCQ to placebo in aPL-positive   REFERENCES
                  patients without a prior history for thrombosis is currently in progress.
                     Other proposed treatments for APS include statins, rituximab     1.  Hughes GR: The anticardiolipin syndrome. Clin Exp Rheumatol 3:285–286, 1985.
                  and vitamin D. Statins have immunomodulatory, antiinflammatory     2.  Harris EN, Hughes GRV, Gharavi AE: The antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.
                                                                           J Rheumatol Suppl 13:210, 1987.
                  and antithrombotic properties that may benefit APS patients. In recent     3.  Simioni P, Prandoni P, Zanon E, et al: Deep venous thrombosis and lupus anticoagu-
                  studies, APS patients treated with statins demonstrated downregulation   lant. A case-control study. Thromb Haemost 76:187–189, 1996.
                  of tissue factor and reduced proinflammatory/prothrombotic markers     4.  Ginsberg JS, Wells PS, Brill-Edwards P, et al: Antiphospholipid antibodies and venous
                  such as interleukin-1β, vascular endothelial growth factor, tumor necro-  thromboembolism. Blood 86:3685–3691, 1995.
                  sis factor α, interferon-inducible protein 10, and soluble CD40L. 330,331  It     5.  Out HJ, Bruinse HW, Christiaens GC, et al: Prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies
                                                                           in patients with fetal loss. Ann Rheum Dis 50:553–557, 1991.
                  has been suggested that a B-cell inhibitor such rituximab may be useful     6.  Shapiro SS, Thiagarajan P: Lupus anticoagulants. Prog Hemost Thromb 6:263–285, 1982.
                  in reducing aPL antibody titers in APS patients. The Rituximab in Anti-    7.  Shapiro SS: Lupus anticoagulants and anticardiolipin antibodies: Personal reminis-
                                                                           cences, a little history, and some random thoughts. J Thromb Haemost 3:831–833, 2005.
                  phospholipid Syndrome (RITAPS) trial did not show reduction in aPL     8.  Asherson RA: The primary, secondary, catastrophic, and seronegative variants of the
                  antibody profiles by rituximab; however, rituximab may be effective in   antiphospholipid syndrome: A personal history long in the making.  Semin Thromb
                                                   332
                  controlling noncriteria manifestations of APS.  Because low vitamin D   Hemost 34:227–235, 2008.
                  levels correlate with arterial and venous thrombosis as well as noncri-    9.  Moore JE, Mohr CF: Biologically false positive serological tests for syphilis: Type, inci-
                                                                           dence, and cause. JAMA 150:467–473, 1952.
                  teria APS manifestations, 333–335  it is recommended that vitamin D defi-    10.  Moore JE, Lutz WB: Natural history of systemic lupus erythematosus: Approach to its
                  ciency (<10 to 20 ng/mL) and insufficiency (<30 ng/mL) be corrected in   study through chronic biologic false positive reactors. J Chronic Dis 1:297–316, 1955.
                  aPL antibody-positive patients. 336                     11.  Bell WN, Alton HG: A brain extract as a substitute for platelet suspensions in the
                                                                           thromboplastin generation test. Nature 174:880–881, 1955.
                     Conventional  anticoagulant  therapy  is  usually  not  sufficient  for     12.  Conley CL, Hartmann RC: A hemorrhagic disorder caused by circulating anticoagulant
                  treatment of CAPS; these patients require aggressive treatment because   in patients with disseminated lupus erythematousus. J Clin Invest 31:621, 1952.


          Kaushansky_chapter 131_p2233-2252.indd   2245                                                                 9/18/15   5:10 PM
   2265   2266   2267   2268   2269   2270   2271   2272   2273   2274   2275