Page 1142 - Clinical Immunology_ Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 1142

1108         Part NiNe  Transplantation


                                                               proliferation and the generation of an effective immune response,
        Glucocorticoids                                        including the cytokines IL-2, IL-4,  TNF-α, and IFN-γ, and
        Corticosteroids have complex immunosuppressive as well as   costimulatory molecules, such as CD154. However, CNIs are
        antiinflammatory effects (Chapter 86). They act principally by   well known for their nephrotoxic properties and are thought to
        binding  to cytoplasmic  glucocorticoid  receptors, although at   be major contributors to chronic allograft dysfunction in renal
        higher doses they can exhibit receptor-independent effects as   transplantation. Thus in modern immunosuppressive regimens,
        well. The steroid–receptor complex translocates to the nucleus,   an attempt is made to minimize or even replace this drug class
        where it is able to alter the expression of multiple cytokines   with less harmful yet equally effective agents.
        through DNA-binding and by targeting transcription factors,
        such as AP-1 and NF-κB. Corticosteroids reduce the expression   Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors
        of many molecules important in the immune response, including   Sirolimus (rapamycin) and everolimus bind to the same immu-
        IL-1, -2, -3, and -6; TNF-α; IFN-γ; and a number of chemokines.   nophilin as tacrolimus (FKBP12), although the complexes they
        By inhibiting cyclooxygenase, corticosteroids are also able to   form are unable to interact with calcineurin. Instead they bind
        reduce the production of inflammatory mediators, such as   to the regulatory kinase mTOR, which has a critical role in
        leukotrienes and prostaglandins.                       cytokine receptor signal transduction. The usual actions of mTOR
           Corticosteroids have been the mainstay of maintenance   are to activate the ribosomal enzyme p70 S6 kinase and block
        immunosuppression regimens for several decades. However,   an inhibitory protein 4E-BP1, both of which are required for
        because of the agents’ wide-ranging effects, not only involving   translation of proteins necessary for progression from the G 1
        the immune response but also a multitude of organ systems,   (growth) phase to the S (DNA synthesis) phase of the cell cycle.
        and its direct nephrotoxicity and diabetogenic properties, in   Therefore inhibition of this pathway in T cells blocks the action
        modern immunosuppressive regimens, an attempt is made to   of cytokines, such as IL-2, -4, and -15, preventing cell cycle
        avoid or withdraw corticosteroids at the earliest possible time   progression and clonal expansion.
        after transplantation (Table 81.1).                       In addition to inhibiting clonal expansion of effector T cells,
                                                               there is growing evidence supporting the role of rapamycin in
        Antiproliferative Agents                               promoting the generation and survival of Tregs, which have
        Azathioprine and MMF interfere with DNA synthesis and prevent   been shown in several animal models to be capable of preventing
                                                                              56
        cell cycle progression. In the context of allograft rejection, this   allograft rejection.  For instance, rapamycin promotes the de
                                                                                                  44
        impairs the clonal expansion of alloreactive T cells.  novo conversion of alloantigen-specific Tregs.  This is in contrast
           Azathioprine is metabolized in the liver to the purine analogue   to CNIs, which inhibit such conversion. This property makes
        6-mercaptopurine and incorporated into DNA. By inhibiting   rapamycin an attractive agent to potentially promote tolerance,
        purine nucleotide synthesis (and therefore DNA and RNA   as discussed further in the following section.
        synthesis), it reduces gene transcription and prevents cell cycle
        progression. The effects of azathioprine are not lymphocyte   TOLERANCE
        specific, and patients must be monitored closely for bone marrow
        suppression.                                           Billingham et al. first introduced the term transplantation tolerance
           MMF is metabolized in the liver to mycophenolic acid, which   in 1953, with the report that inoculation of fetal mice with
        is a noncompetitive, reversible inhibitor of inosine monophos-  lymphoid cells from an allogeneic adult donor mouse of a different
        phate dehydrogenase (IMPDH). Cells are able to generate purines   strain led to later acceptance of skin grafts from the original
                                                                             57
        either de novo by converting inosine monophosphate to guanosine   skin graft donors,  and for their seminal work Medawar received
        monophosphate (catalyzed by IMPDH) or from guanine via the   the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1960.
        salvage pathway. The salvage pathway is less active in lymphocytes   The  condition  in  which  an  SOT  recipient  exhibits  a  well-
        and therefore are relatively dependent on the de novo pathway   functioning graft and lacks histological signs of rejection after
        of purine synthesis compared with other cell types. As a result,   receiving no immunosuppression for at least 1 year is referred to
                                                                                               58
        the effects of MMF are more lymphocyte specific than azathio-  as  clinical  operational  tolerance (COT).  Importantly, patients
        prine, and it is less myelosuppressive. Both agents are commonly   demonstrating COT must also be capable of responding to other
        used in modern maintenance immunosuppression regimens.  non–transplantation-related immune challenges, including infec-
                                                               tions. Over recent years, experimental models have shown that it
        Calcineurin Inhibitors                                 is possible to exploit the processes by which immune homeostasis
        The introduction of cyclosporine in the early 1980s presented   and tolerance to self antigens are maintained to induce tolerance
        a great step forward in transplant-related immunosuppression   to alloantigen (Chapter 12). The optimal outcome for patients
        because this was the first drug able to selectively block T-cell   after transplantation would be harnessing of these mechanisms
        activation. Subsequently a second CNI, the macrolide antibiotic   to induce specific immunological unresponsiveness or tolerance
        tacrolimus, replaced cyclosporine in most immunosuppressive   to the graft, thus avoiding the adverse side effects associated with
        regimens. Almost 99% of renal transplant recipients currently   current immunosuppressive regimens (see Table 81.1).
                  55
        receive CNIs.  Both cyclosporine and tacrolimus bind cytoplasmic   Unfortunately, more than 5 decades of clinical experience in
        immunophilins (cyclophilin in the case of cyclosporine and   SOT have demonstrated that COT in humans is extremely difficult
        FK506-binding protein 12 [FKBP12] in the case of tacrolimus)   to induce intentionally and may only be possible in a subset of
        to  form  complexes  that  can  inhibit  the  calcium-dependent   transplant recipients. Many successful experimental techniques
        phosphatase calcineurin, a rate-limiting enzyme in the TCR   can produce durable hyporesponsiveness to mismatched allografts
        signal–transduction pathway. By preventing translocation of the   in rodent models, but scarcely any have been successfully trans-
        transcription factor NFAT to the nucleus, calcineurin inhibition   lated into large animal models or clinical trials. Progress in the
        impairs upregulation of many molecules important for T-cell   field of transplantation tolerance has also been hampered by the
   1137   1138   1139   1140   1141   1142   1143   1144   1145   1146   1147