Page 595 - Clinical Hematology_ Theory _ Procedures ( PDFDrive )
P. 595

CHAPTER 28  ■  Disorders of Hemostasis and Thrombosis: Blood Coagulation Factors, Hypercoagulable State, and Anticoagulant Therapy                                                                 579







                                 CASE STUDIES






                         Case Study 28.1                                                                                         ■   Laboratory Data
                                                                                                                                   On a    ission, the he  og obin an   he  atocrit were 15.0
                         A 2-year-o    boy  e    ro   a backyar   gy   set. His shou -                                             g/L an   44%, res  ective y. T e P   was 13 secon  s (nor  a ,

                           er an   u    er ar   beca  e very swo  en short y a  er the                                             10 to 15 secon  s), an   the AP     was 55 secon  s (nor  a ,

                          a  . T e boy’s   other took hi   to the e  ergency   e  art-                                             28 to 35 secon  s).

                           ent a  ew hours a  er the inci  ent because he was co  -

                            aining o    ain. On   hysica  exa  ination, the   hysician                                           Because o  the resu ts obtaine   on the origina  an   a re  eat

                         note   that a  arge he  ato  a ha    or  e   in the u    er   art                                       s  eci  en o  the AP     in conjunction with a vague  a  -

                         o  the boy’s right ar  . T ere was no history o  surgery (he                                            i y history o  b ee  ing, this   atient’s surgery was   ost  one

                         ha   not been circu  cise  ), injury, or i  ness. T e boy was                                           unti  a b ee  ing   isor  er cou    be ru e   out.

                         receiving no   e  ication.                                                                              ■   Critical Thinking Group Discussion Questions



                       E  ergency   e  art  ent treat  ent consiste   o  as  irating                                             1.  What coagu ation   e  ciencies   ight be   resent in this

                       the he  ato  a. Subsequent to this treat  ent, the boy began                                                     atient?

                       to b ee   extensive y. He was a    itte   to the hos  ita .

                            T e   o  owing  S  A     aboratory  tests  were  or  ere  :  a                                       2.  What su     e  entary  aboratory assays wou    be a    ro-

                       he  og obin an   he  atocrit,    ate et count, an   b ee  ing                                                    riate?

                       ti  e. Because the b ee  ing continue  , a ty  e an   cross  atch

                        or two units o   resh b oo   were or  ere   on a stan  by basis.                                         3.  How cou    this be   istinguishe    ro   other si  i ar   is-

                            A    itiona  in or  ation  ro   the   other revea e   that                                                 or  ers?

                       the boy’s cousin ha   a “b ee  ing   rob e  .”                                                              Case Study 28.3



                       ■   Laboratory Data                                                                                         A 62-year-o    white   an with a history o  abnor  a  b ee  -
                       He  og obin 8.0 g/L                                                                                         ing was a    itte   to the hos  ita   or a   e  ica  worku

                       He  atocrit 26%                                                                                             be ore   enta  surgery. A brother ha     ie   at age 19 o  trau-

                       P ate et count 200 × 10 /L (nor  a , 150 to 450 × 10 /L)                                                     atic b ee  ing a  er being injure   in a car acci  ent.
                                                                                                            9
                                                             9
                       B ee  ing ti  e 5   inutes (nor  a , 3 to 8   inutes)

                         Subsequent coagu ation   ro   e tests were or  ere   be ore                                             T e   atient ha   his   rst b ee  ing e  iso  e at 7 years o  age

                         the trans usion o  two units o   resh who e b oo  . T e                                                  o  owing a  y    h no  e resection. He re  orte   having sig-

                         resu ts o  these tests were as  o  ows:                                                                 ni  cant he  orrhaging as a teenager  o  owing   i    trau  a.
                                                                                                                                 At age 30, the   atient ha   a tooth extraction  o  owe   by 3

                       P   12 secon  s (nor  a , 11 to 15 secon  s)                                                              weeks o  b ee  ing, at which ti  e he receive   a b oo   trans-

                       AP     60 secon  s (nor  a , 28 to 35 secon  s)                                                            usion. At age 31, he was given a b oo   trans usion be ore

                       T ro  bin ti  e-re  ti ase   etho   20 secon  s (nor  a , 18 to                                           an a    en  ecto  y an   on that occasion ha   no b ee  ing

                            22 secon  s)                                                                                         whatsoever.   wo years be ore a    ission, the   atient su -

                                                                                                                                  ere    ro   gastrointestina  b ee  ing  o  owing surgery  or a
                       ■   Critical Thinking Group Discussion Questions
                       1.  Do the  aboratory   ata su    ort a   iagnosis o  a   isor  er                                        hiata  hernia. At that ti  e, he was given two units o  bank

                            o  he  ostasis?                                                                                      b oo   an   two units o   resh b oo  . B ee  ing subsi  e   an
                                                                                                                                 his subsequent recovery was goo  .


                       2.  What ty  es o    isor  ers can be   re i  inari y i  enti  e                                          ■   Laboratory Data

                            by the tests that were   er or  e  ?                                                                   T e  aboratory   n  ings were as  o  ows:




                       3.  What con  r  atory tests   ust be   one in this case?                                                 He  og obin 7.0 g/L
                                                                                                                                 He  atocrit 23%

                                                                                                                                 P ate et count 498 × 10 /L
                                                                                                                                                                       9
                         Case Study 28.2
                                                                                                                                 B ee  ing ti  e (Ivy) 2   inutes (nor  a ,  ess than 8   inutes)

                         A 21-year-o    b ack   rison in  ate was a    itte   to the                                             Who e b oo   c otting ti  e average   188   inutes (nor  a ,

                         hos  ita   or the re  air o  an ab  o  ina  hernia. His   hy-                                                  ess than 70   inutes)

                         sician  was  concerne    that  strangu ation  o   the  hernia                                           P ate et aggregation nor  a

                         cou    occur. T e   atient was in extre  e y goo     hysica                                             AP     53 secon  s (contro , 39 secon  s)

                           con  ition. He   i   not re  e  ber having any unusua  i  -                                           P   13.8 secon  s (contro , 13.3 secon  s)

                         nesses. His  a  i y  history   i   inc u  e   inor b ee  ing                                            S  eci  c assays  or  actors VIII an   IX were   er or  e  . T e

                           rob e  s a  ong so  e o  his re atives.                                                                      eve  o  activity o   actor IX was  ess than 5%.





                                                                                                                                                                                                                    (continued)
   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600