Page 148 - HOW TO PROVE IT: A Structured Approach, Second Edition
P. 148

P1: PIG/
                   0521861241c03  CB996/Velleman  October 20, 2005  2:42  0 521 86124 1  Char Count= 0






                                   134                         Proofs
                                     11. Consider the following putative theorem:
                                        Theorem? Suppose m is an even integer and n is an odd integer. Then
                                         2
                                              2
                                        n − m = n + m.
                                        (a) What’s wrong with the following proof of the theorem?
                                           Proof. Since m is even, we can choose some integer k such that
                                           m = 2k. Similarly, since n is odd we have n = 2k + 1. Therefore
                                              2
                                                             2
                                                   2
                                                                         2
                                                                   2
                                                                                      2
                                             n − m = (2k + 1) − (2k) = 4k + 4k + 1 − 4k = 4k + 1

                                                    = (2k + 1) + (2k) = n + m.
                                        (b) Is the theorem correct? Justify your answer with either a proof or a
                                           counterexample.
                                    ∗
                                     12. Prove that ∀x ∈ R[∃y ∈ R(x + y = xy) ↔ x  = 1].
                                                            +
                                     13. Prove that ∃z ∈ R∀x ∈ R [∃y ∈ R(y − x = y/x) ↔ x  = z].
                                   p d14. Suppose B is a set and F is a family of sets. Prove that ∪{A \ B | A ∈
                                        F}⊆∪(F \ P (B)).
                                    ∗
                                     15. Suppose F and G are nonempty families of sets and every element of F
                                        is disjoint from some element of G. Prove that ∪F and ∩G are disjoint.
                                   p d16. Prove that for any set A, A =∪P (A).
                                   p ∗
                                   d 17. Suppose F and G are families of sets.
                                        (a) Prove that ∪(F ∩ G) ⊆ (∪F) ∩ (∪G).
                                        (b) What’s wrong with the following proof that (∪F) ∩ (∪G) ⊆
                                           ∪(F ∩ G)?
                                           Proof. Suppose x ∈ (∪F) ∩ (∪G). This means that x ∈∪F and
                                           x ∈∪G,so ∃A ∈ F(x ∈ A) and ∃A ∈ G(x ∈ A). Thus, we can
                                           choose a set A such that A ∈ F, A ∈ G, and x ∈ A. Since A ∈ F and
                                           A ∈ G, A ∈ F ∩ G. Therefore ∃A ∈ F ∩ G(x ∈ A), so x ∈∪(F ∩
                                           G). Since x was arbitrary, we can conclude that (∪F) ∩ (∪G) ⊆
                                           ∪(F ∩ G).

                                        (c) Find an example of families of sets F and G for which ∪(F ∩ G)  =
                                           (∪F) ∩ (∪G).
                                   p d18. Suppose F and G are families of sets. Prove that (∪F) ∩ (∪G) ⊆
                                        ∪(F ∩ G)iff ∀A ∈ F∀B ∈ G(A ∩ B ⊆∪(F ∩ G)).
                                   p d19. Suppose F and G are families of sets. Prove that ∪F and ∪G are disjoint
                                        iff for all A ∈ F and B ∈ G, A and B are disjoint.
                                   p d20. Suppose F and G are families of sets.
                                        (a) Prove that (∪F) \ (∪G) ⊆∪(F \ G).
                                        (b) What’s wrong with the following proof that ∪(F \ G) ⊆ (∪F) \
                                           (∪G)?
   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153