Page 369 - HOW TO PROVE IT: A Structured Approach, Second Edition
P. 369

P1: PIG/
                   0521861241apx01  CB996/Velleman  October 20, 2005  2:56  0 521 86124 1  Char Count= 0






                                         Appendix 1: Solutions to Selected Exercises   355
                                                                          n
                                                                              n
                                     Induction step: Suppose that n ≥ 1 and 0 < a < b . Multiplying
                                                                                     n
                                   this inequality by the positive number a we get 0 < a n+1  < ab , and
                                                                                    n
                                   multiplying the inequality a < b by the positive number b gives
                                       n
                                   us ab < b n+1 . Combining these inequalities, we can conclude that
                                   0 < a n+1  < b n+1 .
                                                    √      √
                               (b) Hint: First note that  n  a and  n  b are both positive. (For n odd, this
                                   follows from exercise 18. For n even, each of a and b has two nth
                                                                   √      √
                                   roots, one positive and one negative, but  n  a and  n  b are by definition
                                   the positive roots.) Now use proof by contradiction, and apply part (a).
                               (c) Hint: The inequality to be proven can be rearranged to read a n+1  −
                                          n
                                     n
                                   ab − ba + b n+1  > 0. Now factor the left side of this inequality.
                               (d) Hint: Use mathematical induction. For the base case, use the n = 1 case
                                   of part (c). For the induction step, multiply both sides of the inductive
                                   hypothesis by (a + b)/2 and then apply part (c).

                                                      Section 6.2
                             1. (a) We must prove that R is reflexive, transitive, and antisymmetric. For


                                   the first, suppose x ∈ A . Since R is reflexive, (x, x) ∈ R,so(x, x) ∈




                                   R ∩ (A × A ) = R . This shows that R is reflexive.

                                     Next, suppose that (x, y) ∈ R and (y, z) ∈ R . Then (x, y) ∈
                                   R, (y, z) ∈ R, and x, y, z ∈ A . Since R is transitive, (x, z) ∈ R,so




                                   (x, z) ∈ R ∩ (A × A ) = R . Therefore R is transitive.



                                     Finally, suppose that (x, y) ∈ R and (y, x) ∈ R . Then (x, y) ∈ R

                                   and (y, x) ∈ R, so since R is antisymmetric, x = y. Thus R is anti-
                                   symmetric.
                               (b) To see that T is reflexive, suppose x ∈ A.If x = a, then (x, x) =


                                   (a, a) ∈{a}× A ⊆ T .If x  = a, then x ∈ A , so since R is reflexive,
                                   (x, x) ∈ R ⊆ T ⊆ T .


                                     For transitivity, suppose that (x, y) ∈ T and (y, z) ∈ T .If x = a
                                   then (x, z) = (a, z) ∈{a}× A ⊆ T . Now suppose x  = a. Then
                                   (x, y) /∈{a}× A, so since (x, y) ∈ T = T ∪ ({a}× A) we must have


                                   (x, y) ∈ T . But T ⊆ A × A ,so y ∈ A and therefore y  = a. Similar





                                   reasoning now shows that (y, z) ∈ T . Since T is transitive, it follows


                                   that (x, z) ∈ T ⊆ T .
                                     To show that T is antisymmetric, suppose (x, y) ∈ T and (y, x) ∈ T .

                                   If x = a then (y, x) /∈ T ,so(y, x) ∈{a}× A and therefore y = a =
                                   x. Similarly, if y = a then x = y. Now suppose x  = a and y  = a. Then

                                   as in the proof of transitivity it follows that (x, y) ∈ T and (y, x) ∈ T ,


                                   so by antisymmetry of T , x = y.
   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374