Page 147 - The Design Thinking Playbook
P. 147

EXPERT TIP

                     Recruiting an interdisciplinary
                     team with T profiles


        Lilly still plays with the idea of founding a consultancy firm for design thinking. She would need to recruit   If you want to take the time and experience potential team members
        her future colleagues against a T-shaped profile in order to cope with the professional challenges and be   in actual practice, you can hold something like a design thinking
        able to work as a team, on which all have the same social skills. It is probably easier to find people with   boot camp. It can serve several purposes: For one, it is a quick
        specialist skills for the individual process steps—corresponding to an I profile—than those who have both   and easy way for candidates to experience design thinking and its
        forms of knowledge.                                                      individual steps in practice and judge for themselves if they want to
                                                                                 collaborate in this way. Second, those who assemble the team quickly
        A good sign for the ability to collaborate, from the horizontal bar, is when people during the interview talk   get an idea of the specialist and social skills of future team members.
        not only about themselves but also emphasize what they have learned from others and how valuable the
        collaboration was for the common project.                                Interdisciplinary teams have many advantages, which, among other
                                                                                 things, lead to a better-quality result within a shorter time. At the
        Quite specifically, it can help to have the potential candidates create their own T profile. The way some-  same time, the complexity of the collaboration increases with this
        body fills out the profile yields a lot of information on his way of thinking and expressing himself. At the   approach compared to an individual way of working, without iterative
        same time, it shows how somebody interprets the requirements for collaboration and presents himself in   agreements. The complexity can be reduced using a few simple rules,
        this respect.                                                            on which the entire team should agree from the outset if the collab-
                                                                                 oration is to be successful. Some of them already comply with the
                                                                                 principles of design thinking anyway, but it has proven to be of value
                                                                                 for the team to reflect on them consciously again.


                            Creative  Analytical



                                             GENERALIST
                            GENERALIST                       GENERALIST
              GENERALIST                           EXPERT      EXPERT




                      EXPERT      EXPERT




         146
   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152