Page 46 - TI Journal 18-1
P. 46

40                                       TATE



       biological underpinnings of therapeutic effects. With   ing from anxiety (16), depression (3,34), headaches,
      proper evidence guiding the use of neuromodulation   drug withdrawal symptoms (72), fibromyalgia (24),
      therapies, these methods could be used to treat a   post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (35,57), and
      number of complex disorders or serve as a valuable   even bipolar depression (43). Most of these studies
      addition to established treatment paradigms.   demonstrate positive effects of CES on these disorders
        As these technologies are being recognized and   and include symptom reduction with minimal side
      optimized, the research regarding the clinical poten-  effects. There have even been a few studies that have
      tial has evolved. Thus, the purpose of this manuscript   demonstrated positive effects on learning paradigms
      is to review the current magnetic resonance imag-  that are interpreted as influencing neuroplasticity
      ing (MRI) literature for more objective evidence   (32). However, there is a need for additional research
      of treatment efficacy or biological insights into the   before the biological mechanisms of action are clearly
       brain changes associated with three common neu-  understood (58).
      romodulation techniques (cranial electrotherapy     MRI as a technological means of assessing struc-
       stimulation (CES), transcranial direct current stimu-  tural and functional change in the brain before, during,
       lation (tDCS), and transcranial magnetic stimulation   and after treatment presents a plausible method of
      (TMS)). Though there are a number of different ways   examining the effects of CES. Structural and func-
      to measure or image the effects of these neuromod-  tional differences in the brain are often observed in a
      ulatory methods on the brain, the main focus of this   number of the disorders for which CES is indicated
      review is on the use of various MRI sequences. Each   (33,45,50), and regularization/minimization of these
      neuromodulation technique is described briefly below,   differences could be used as a way of understanding
      and the current imaging literature supporting/disre-  the biological or neuroplastic changes that occur
      garding these treatments is then summarized.   in the context of treatment. Currently, there are no
                                                    structural MRI studies of therapeutic effects following
      Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES)      CES. Structural and more advanced MRI methods
        In the United States, CES technology is classified   such as diffusion weighted or diffusion tensor imag-
       by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a   ing (DWI/DTI) might prove useful in demonstrating
      Class III medical device and is approved for the treat-  structural connectivity. The physics behind DWI/DTI
      ment of insomnia, depression, anxiety, and pain. CES   acquisition, the growing number of ways to examine
      is a non-invasive device that uses transcutaneous   these data, and the studies that demonstrate changes
      pulsed microcurrents of less than 1000 µA to the   in connectivity combined with the positive results
      head, usually with electrodes applied to the ear lobes   of CES seen in the controlled studies provide fertile
      or scalp. Dosage can be managed by the individual,   ground for investigating the effects of CES with MRI.
      and a therapy session usually ranges from 20 to 60     Though there are currently no significant struc-
      minutes. Reports of adverse effects (e.g., slight tin-  tural MRI findings supporting CES, functional MRI
      gling sensation at the electrode site, lightheadedness,   methods have been used. One advanced MRI method
      dizziness) from CES therapy are rare, with CES users   that has been used is resting state functional MRI
      generally reporting more positive experiences.   (rsfMRI). rsfMRI allows researchers to characterize
        CES is thought to generate its effects by direct   the large-scale organization of the neural networks by
      action on the brain, but the exact mechanism by   looking at the temporal relationship of the changes
      which the electrical current from CES alters brain   (how one signal changes in time relative to another
      function remains somewhat unclear. Early electro-   signal in time) of the blood-oxygenated-level-de-
      encephalographic (EEG) studies found changes dur-   pendent (BOLD) signals from throughout the brain.
      ing and after CES treatment, including alpha EEG   Examination of these signals when the person is not
      wave changes similar to trained meditators (18,73).   actively engaged by a task in the scanner (at rest) has
      There are also a number of controlled studies that   documented the default mode network (DMN) (66),
       show benefits of CES treatments for patients suffer-  the functional connectivity pattern the brain reverts
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51