Page 32 - Technology and Innovation Journal - 19-1
P. 32

370                              DOMSCHKE & BLAHO



           opment from conception to launch. The industry        proof, trials in the U.S., trials outside U.S.,
           subject matter expert Dr. Abhishek Datta, who       infringement, infringement opinions, validity
           is employed as CTO at a medical device start-up       opinions, and damages and injunctions. Stu-
           company, was recruited as course director.      dents performed initial searches of the United
                                                       States Patent and Trademark Office website for
           ◉ Regulatory topics covered were the latest       patents related to their planned projects.
            regulatory developments presented at the 2015       The goal was to enable them to integrate the IP
            conference Food and Drug Administration       sequencing timeline into the product devel-
            (FDA) Small Business Regulatory Education       opment pathway.
            for Industry (REdI). These topics included
            the FDA and its regulations, establishment      ◉ In addition to the comprehensive course mate-
             registration, medical device listing, medical       ial described above, the basics of smart pat-
            device tracking, drug establishment regis-      ent searching and smart patenting were
            tration, drug listings, and an overview of       taught by University Research Commer-
            basic regulatory requirements. Details of       cialization Manager Neeti Mitra at the CUNY
            the FDA approval process were given, includ-       Technology Commercialization Office. This
            ing device classification, predicate devices, the       workshop enabled the students to find,
            de novo classification process, humanitarian        understand, and evaluate patents related to
            device exemption, product codes and regu-      their products as well as enabled communica-
            lation numbers, drug regulation, orange book,       tion with legal experts to create successful pat-
            types of drug filings, drug product exclusivity,       ents. Topics included novelty and prior art
             and Hatch-Waxman regulations. Regulatory       searches as well as understanding the back-
            pathways for medical devices were described,       ground and purpose of the invention. Students
            including 510(k), 513(g), and premarket       were taught how to identify the key areas of
            approval filings. Regulatory pathways for drugs       invention, develop search strategies to iden-
            included new drug applications, abbreviated        tify similar patents, and find relevant key word,
            new drug applications, and 505(b)(2) filings.       international patent classification, and struc-
            Students were assigned medical devices or       ture data in relevant patent databases. Stu-
            licensed drugs for which they researched the       dents were encouraged to create a final search
            regulatory pathway that led to its approval.        set for analysis and to identify prior art. Smart
             Further topics included strategies for inter-       patenting topics included IP management,
            actions with the FDA, clinical trial basics, and       patent commercialization, strategies of defensive
            select international regulations (European        and offensive patenting, cross-licensing, in-
            Union, Canada, etc.).                      licensing, out-licensing, fields of use, territories,
                                                       and time frames.
           ◉ IP discussions began with an overview
            of patents. Topics included patent definition,      ◉ Quality assurance (QA) is an essential part
            content, terms, and acquisition. Students were       of Stage 3. The MTM program includes
            walked through a patent example that included       comprehensive quality assurance classes and
            a description of all its aspects (methods, ranges,       an expert guest lecture. Classes in QA were
            etc.). Other topics included requirements for       taught in the first semester. Continued QA
            patentability, freedom to operate, inventorship       “refresher” lectures—to be placed through-
            and proof of invention, trademarks and       out the whole curriculum—are envisioned
            copyrights, provisional and non-provisional       for future cohorts. QA was covered in a series
            applications, U.S. filing, international patent       of guest lectures. Topics included FDA qual-
            coverage and filing, patent examination, notice       ity system regulation, quality policy, a quality
            of allowance, patent maintenance, licensing,       manual, and subsystems of a quality system
            the university IP process, nondisclosure agree-      (i.e., management using six systems: design
            ments, patent enforcement basics, burden of       controls, material controls, record controls,
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37