Page 34 - Technology and Innovation Journal - 19-1
P. 34

372                              DOMSCHKE & BLAHO



      or no go conclusion by the end of the course. Simply  paths and to learn first-hand how their learning was
      put, the NSF I-Corps program enables academic  progressing. Students were asked for feedback, which
      researchers to quickly determine the technology’s  was shared in a timely manner with the program
      readiness in the marketplace.               advisory board for review and possible program mod-
        The challenges we met in adapting this process to  ification. It was concluded that these timely feedback
      the new CCNY MTM program included the small  sessions assisted in keeping the evolving program on
      number of students in the class and the fact that the  track.
      program focused on a single technology solution.
      Accordingly, the Engineering Entrepreneurship  Stage-Gate Meetings Enable Group Faculty
      course began with three weeks of introduction (how  Assessments
      the course fits into the Stage-Gate process), ideation,    At the end of each stage (semester), the students
      and brainstorming. We “promoted” each student to  were required to give formal Stage-Gate presenta-
      the level of division head and charged them with  tions to their company executives (the faculty). Thus,
      identifying which indication their division would  all students presented the multidisciplinary course
      investigate by customer discovery for the semester.  material they had learned in a coherent manner and
      We then proceeded through the usual Lean Launch-  from a business perspective in front of all faculty in
      Pad inverted classroom model for the remainder of  one single session. During the immediate subsequent
      the course. Students were expected to create a final  executive review session, the faculty were able to have
      lessons learned video and make a final lessons learned  an honest, data-driven discussion about the progress
      presentation. Results in Figure 5 indicate that the  of the students through the program. It was con-
      students learned a significant amount about aspects  cluded that these sessions functioned as an important,
      related to the creation of a business model. The left   nonbiased quality control step for the program, as
      panel of Figure 5 shows the students’ level of under-  all faculty reviewed the students’ progress through
      standing prior to the course, and it is mixed. However,  their colleagues’ courses.
      upon completion of the course (right panel), the
      students indicate that they understood a great deal  Semester 1 Student Feedback Empowered the
      about all of the aspects of a business model.   These  Students
      results suggest that incorporating the Lean Launch-    Following the first gate meeting, the students were
      Pad methodology into a Stage-Gate-driven program   asked to fill out a very short feedback survey with
      can successfully teach entrepreneurship concepts.  two questions: 1) How would you rate the efficacy
                                                  of the MTM program to develop your professional
      RESULTS                                     skills? and 2) How would you rate the helpfulness
        Whenever a new teaching paradigm is launched,  of the mentor session to develop a more focused
      it is imperative that an accurate assessment process  picture of your career aspiration and steps toward
      is also developed alongside to determine the overall  achieving it? Both of these open-ended questions
      impact of the teaching process. For example, the  were rated on a scale of 0 to 10 (0= not helpful at
      Engineering Entrepreneurship course described  all, 10= extremely helpful), and the students were
      above leveraged its already existing assessment pro-  asked to support their rankings with a short written
      cedure (13). Instructors successfully captured the key  response. As expected, these surveys enabled the
      learning milestones that the students accomplished  tracking of the professional progress of the students.
      (Figure 5). A similar rigorous assessment plan was  An important conclusion from this activity was that
      also developed for the CCNY MTM program, and  it served as a method for reinforcing to the students
      the results were as follows.                that the faculty are interested in their development
                                                  as professionals as well as their learning as students.
      Mentoring Sessions Provide Real-Time,
      Longitudinal Assessments                    A Detailed, Final Survey Documented the Impact
        As described in the Methods section above, Dom-  of the Program
      schke regularly met with the students in defined    After the completion of the second Stage-Gate
      sessions to assist students in the pursuit of their career  meeting (during the third and final stage), the
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39