Page 152 - Nursing: The Philosophy and Science of Caring

Fr om carative Fa c t o r 6 t o C ar it as ProC e s s 6

Practice, ed. Nursing Data Systems: The Emerging Framework. Washington, DC:
American Nurses Publishing; 1995:19–30.
7. Baumann S. Nurses notes: the text of nursing. Nurs Sci Q. 2004; 17(3):267.
8. Brown B, Crawford P. Putting the debate on nursing language in con-
text. Nurs Stand. 1999;14(1):41–43.
9. Walsh K, Kowanko I. Nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of dignity. Int J
Nurs Pract. June 2002;8(3):143–151.
10. Mairis E. Concept clarification of professional practice—dignity. J Adv
Nurs. May 1994;19(5):947–953.
11. Soderberg A, Gilje F, Norberg A. Dignity in situations of ethical diffi-
culty in intensive care. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. June 1997;13(3):135–144.
12. University of Iowa, College of Nursing. Nursing intervention classifica-
tion overview. Available at: http://www.nursing.uiowa.edu/centers/cncce/
nic/nicoverview.htm. Accessed January 29, 2004.
13. University of Iowa, College of Nursing. Nursing outcome classification
overview. http://www.nursing.uiowa.edu/centers/cncce/noc/nocoverview.
htm. Accessed January 29, 2004.
14. Clark J, Lang NM. Nursing’s next advance: an international classifica-
tion for nursing practice. Int Nurs Rev. 1992; 39:109–111, 128.

Figure 12. Two Girls, by Adolphe William Bouguereau. Collection, The Denver Art
Museum.

124