Page 55 - alligood 8th edition_Neat

36 UNIT I Evolution of Nursing Theories

Im, E. (2006). A situation-specific theory of Caucasian sociology: International perspectives on mathematical and
cancer patients’ pain experience. Advances in Nursing statistical modeling. New York: Academic Press.
Science, 29(3), 232–244. Parker, M. E. (2006). Nursing theories & nursing practice
Im, E., & Meleis, A. (1999). Situation-specific theories: (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
philosophical roots, properties and approach. Advances Peterson, S. J. (2008). Middle range theories: Application to
in Nursing Science, 22(2), 11–24. nursing research (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott,
Kao, H., Reeder, F., Hsu, M., & Cheng, S. (2006). A Chinese Williams & Wilkins.
view of the Western nursing metaparadigm. Journal of Posey, A. (2006). Symptom perception: a concept explora-
Holistic Nursing, 24(2), 92–101. tion. Nursing Forum, 41(3), 113–124.
Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for Poulin-Tabor, D., & Hyrkas, K. (2008). Evaluation of post-
behavioral science. New York: Chandler. operative blood salvage and re-transfusion in a total
Keenan, J. (1999). A concept analysis of autonomy. Journal knee arthoplasty patient population: a retrospective
of Advanced Nursing, 29(3), 556–562. study. MEDSURG Nursing, 17(5), 317–321.
Lawson, L. (2003). Becoming a success story: how boys who Rector, T. S., & Cohn, J. N. (1992). Assessment of patient out-
have molested children talk about treatment. Journal of come with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure ques-
Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 10, 259–268. tionnaire: reliability and validity during a randomized,
Liehr, P., & Smith, M. J. (1999). Middle range theory: spinning double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pimobendan.
research and practice to create knowledge for the new Pimobendan Multicenter Research Group. American
millennium. Advances in Nursing Science, 21(4), 8–91. Heart Journal, 124(4): 1017–1025.
Lorentzon, M. (1998). The way forward: nursing research or Reed, P. (2000). Nursing reformation: historical reflections
collaborative health care research? Journal of Advanced and philosophic foundations. Nursing Science Quarterly,
Nursing, 27, 675–676. 13(2), 129–136.
Lutz, K., Jones, K., & Kendall, J. (1997). Expanding the praxis Reynolds, P. (1971). A primer in theory construction.
debate: contributions to clinical inquiry. Advances in Indianapolis, (IN):Bobbs-Merrill.
Nursing Science, 20(2), 13–22. Rodgers, B. L. (1989). Concept analysis, the development of
Malinski, V. (1994). Spirituality: a pattern manifestation of knowledge: the evolutionary cycle. Journal of Advanced
the human/environment mutual process. Visions: The Nursing, 14, 330–335.
Journal of Rogerian Science, 2(1), 12–18. Russell, A. C. (2012). Moral distress in neuroscience
Malinski, V. (2000). Research-based evaluation of concep- nursing: an evolutionary concept analysis. Journal of
tual models of nursing. Nursing Science Quarterly, Neuroscience Nursing, 44(1), 15–26.
13(2), 103–110. Salmon, W. D. (1973). Logic. Englewood Cliffs, (NJ):
McCrae, N. (2011). Whither nursing models? The value of Prentice Hall.
nursing theory in the context of evidence-based practice Sayers, K., & de Vries, K. (2008). A concept development
and multidisciplinary health care. Journal of Advanced of ‘being sensitive’ in nursing. Nursing Ethics, 15(3),
Nursing, 68(1), 222–229. 289–303.
McMahon, S., & Fleury, J. (2012). Wellness in older adults: Schlotfeldt, R. (1992). Why promote clinical nursing schol-
a concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 47(1), 39–51. arship? Clinical Nursing Research, 1(1), 5–8.
Meleis, A. (2007). Theoretical nursing: Development and Schwartz-Barcott, D., & Kim, H. S. (2000). An expansion and
progress (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & elaboration of the hybrid model of concept development.
Wilkins. In B. L. Rodgers & K. A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept develop-
Merton, R. K. (1967). On theoretical sociology. New York: ment in nursing (2nd ed., pp. 129–160). Philadelphia:
Free Press. Saunders.
Monti, E., & Tingen, M. (1999). Multiple paradigms of Sieloff, C., & Frey, M. A. (2007). Middle range theory
nursing science. Advances in Nursing Science, 21(4), development using King’s conceptual system. New York:
64–80. Springer.
Morse, J. (1995). Exploring the theoretical basis of nursing Silva, M. (1986). Research testing nursing theory: state of
using advanced techniques of concept analysis. Advances the art. Advances in Nursing Science, 9(10), 1–11.
in Nursing Science, 17, 31–46. Smith, M. J. & Liehr, P. (2008).Middle range theory for nursing
Mullins, N. (1971). The art of theory: Construction and use. (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
New York: Harper & Row. Smith M. J., & Liehr, P. (2012). Concept building: applying
Nowak, S. (1975). Causal interpretations of statistical relation- rigor to conceptualization phenomena for nursing
ships in social research. In H. Blalock (Ed.), Quantitative research. Applied Nursing Research, 25(2), 65–67.