Page 580 - alligood 8th edition_Neat
P. 580

CHAPTER 28  Merle H. Mishel  561

             by  promoting  interpretation  of  events,  and  indi-  evidence  from  qualitative  studies  that  suggested
             rectly by strengthening the stimuli frame.  that people’s responses to uncertainty changed over
           •  Uncertainty appraised as danger prompts coping   time within the context of serious chronic illnesses.
             efforts  directed  at  reducing  the  uncertainty  and   Thus  Mishel’s  theory  represents  the  bidirectional
             managing the emotional arousal generated by it.  process  where  theory  informs  and  is  informed  by
           •  Uncertainty appraised as opportunity prompts cop-  research.
             ing efforts directed at maintaining the uncertainty.
           •  The influence of uncertainty on psychological out-  Acceptance by the Nursing Community
             comes  is  mediated  by  the  effectiveness  of  coping
             efforts to reduce uncertainty appraised as danger or   Practice
             to maintain uncertainty appraised as opportunity.  Mishel’s  theory  describes  a  phenomenon  experi-
           •  When  uncertainty  appraised  as  danger  cannot    enced  by  acute  and  chronically  ill  individuals  and
             be  reduced  effectively,  coping  strategies  can  be   their  families.  The  theory  has  its  beginning  in
             employed to manage the emotional response.  Mishel’s own experience with her father’s battle with
           •  The  longer  uncertainty  continues  in  the  illness   cancer.  During  his  illness,  he  began  to  focus  on
             context, the more unstable the individual’s previ-  events  that  seemed  unimportant  to  those  around
             ously accepted mode of functioning becomes.  him.  When  asked  why  he  had  chosen  to  focus  on
           •  Under  conditions  of  enduring  uncertainty,  indi-  such  events,  he  replied  that  when  these  activities
             viduals may develop a new, probabilistic perspec-  were being done, he understood what was happen-
             tive on life, which accepts uncertainty as a natural   ing to him. Mishel believed this was her father’s way
             part of life.                               of taking control and making sense out of an over-
           •  The  process  of  integrating  continual  uncertainty   whelming situation. She knew early in the develop-
             into a new view of life can be blocked or prolonged   ment  of  her  concept  and  theory  that  nurses  could
             by structure providers who do not support proba-  identify the phenomenon from their experiences in
             bilistic thinking.                          caring for patients.
           •  Prolonged  exposure  to  uncertainty  appraised  as   Several nurses have moved the theory from research
             danger can lead to intrusive thoughts, avoidance,   to practice. Hansen and colleagues (2012) synthesized
             and severe emotional distress.              findings from qualitative studies to yield a typology of
                                                         patient experiences of uncertainty that guides nursing
                                                         engagement and intervention. Similarly, the theory has
            Logical Form                                 been  used  in  recommendations  for  the  practice  of
           As a middle-range theory derived from and applica-  critical,  medical-surgical,  and  enterostomal  nursing
           ble to clinical practice, Mishel’s Uncertainty in Illness   care (Hilton, 1992; Righter, 1995; Wurzbach, 1992).
           Theory is an exemplar of the multiple steps required   Based on review of the database of the Managing
           to develop theory with both heuristic and practical   Uncertainty  in  Illness  Scale  users  (Mishel,  1997b),
           value.  Neither  purely  inductive  nor  deductive,   master’s-prepared  clinicians  seek  to  understand  the
           Mishel’s  theoretical  work  initially  arose  from  ques-  experience of uncertainty in a variety of clinical set-
           tioning the nature of an important clinical problem,   tings and patient populations. The scale and theory
           followed  by  systematic  qualitative  and  quantitative   are used by clinicians from 15 countries other than
           inquiry and careful application of theory borrowed   the United States.
           from other disciplines. Since publication of the origi-
           nal theory in 1988, Mishel and others have carried   Education
           out  numerous  empirical  tests  of  the  relationships   The theory has been widely used by graduate students
           among the major constructs in the model, applying   as the theoretical framework for theses and disserta-
           and largely confirming the theory in illness contexts.   tions,  as  the  topic  of  concept  analysis,  and  for  the
           Mishel’s  reconceptualization  of  the  theory  in  1990   critique of middle-range nursing theory. Mishel uses
           was deductive in that it was developed from princi-  the  theory  as  an  exemplar  to  illustrate  how  theory
           ples of chaos theory and was confirmed by empirical   guides  the  development  of  nursing  interventions  in
   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585