Page 145 - test2
P. 145

operation, once the pods had been pulled and rerun, only 2.3 gallons of
                   hydraulic fluid were pumped to close the upper VBR.  This would have been an
                   insufficient amount of fluid to close the VBR had it been in an open state.
                   Furthermore, DNV found no cut upper VBR hydraulic hoses during
                   intervention.  The VBR was also found to be in the closed position at Michoud.

                          DNV found that multiple forces acted upon the drill pipe during the
                   blowout, resulting in the “elastic buckling” of the drill pipe.  Elastic buckling can
                   occur when a structural element loses stability when force is applied.  Once the
                   force causing the buckling is removed, the object reverts to its original form.

                          The Panel determined that either of the following scenarios, or some
                   combination of them, led to the elastic buckling of the drill pipe at the time the
                   blind shear ram activated, which contributed to the failure of the blind shear ram
                   to cut the drill pipe and seal the well:

                         The forces from the blowout acting on the drill pipe pushed the tool joint
                          into (or further into) the upper annular element.  The drill pipe was then
                          unable to move upward at the upper annular but was able to move
                          upward at the upper VBR; and/or

                         The draw works (the equipment on the rig that supports the drill pipe that
                          is lowered into the riser) collapsed shortly after the explosions, thus
                          allowing approximately 150,000 lbs of unsupported drill pipe to act as a
                          downward force against the upper VBR.
                                                                     342

                          Regardless of the conditions that led to the elastic buckling, DNV
                   concluded that, based upon the physical evidence of the drill pipe, wellbore, and
                   the BSR blocks, the drill pipe became trapped between the BSR faces, which
                   prevented the BSR from fully closing.   See Figure 12 below.  DNV found that
                                                           343
                   these conditions likely occurred “from the moment the well began flowing and
                   would have remained until either the end conditions changed (change in Upper
                   Annular or Upper VBR state) or the deflected drill pipe was physically altered
                   (sheared).”
                               344


                   342  Testimony of Daun Winslow, Joint Investigation Hearing, August 23, 2010, at 452.
                   343
                      Addendum to Final Report for United States Department of the Interior – Bureau of Ocean
                   Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement – Forensic Examination of the Deepwater
                   Horizon Blowout Preventer (April 30, 2011) (“Addendum to DNV Report”) at 11.
                   344  DNV Report, Vol. 1 at 4.


                                                            140
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150