Page 40 - Hamlet: The Cambridge Dover Wilson Shakespeare
P. 40

I N T R O D U C T I O N        xxxiii

                            n
                my word  (1.5. o); yes, by  St Patrick  (i. 5.136);  I'll loose
                my  daughter  to  him  (2.  2.  162);  I  know  a  hawk  from  a
                handsaw  (2. 2.  383)5 the  law  of writ  and  the liberty  (2. 2.
                406); like French  falconers  (2. 2.434); the whips and  scorns
                of  time  (3,  1.  70);  the  undiscovered  country  (3.  1.  79);
                inexplicable  dumb-shows  (3. 2.  12); I  eat  the air,  promise-
                crammed (3.2.91); I havenothingwith  this answer  (3.2.93)}
                miching  mallecho  (3.2.135)5 Lucianus, nephew to the king
                (3. 2. 243)5 tnese  pickers and stealers (3. 2. 337); horrid  hent
                (3.  3. 88); enseamed  (3. 4.  92);  lapsed  in  time  and  passion
                (3. 4.  107); this piteous  action  (3. 4.  128); the  body  is with
                the  king,  but  the  king  is not  with  the  body  (4. 2.  26-7) 5
                a  thing  of  nothing  (4. 2.  28-9);  a  little  patch  of  ground
                (4.4.18); nature is fine in love (4. 5.161);  O, how the wheel
                becomes it!  (4. 5.  171);  a plurisy  (4. 7.  116); a pair  of  in-
                dentures (5.1.107); drink up eisel,eata  crocodile  (5.1.270)}
                a  comma  'tween  their  amities  (5. 2. 42);  he  hath  laid  on
                twelve  for  nine  (5.  2.  168) j  with  the  shell  on  his  head
                (5. 2.  186).
                  The  principal reason why  so much remains to do in
                the exegesis of Hamlet and other  plays is that  The  New
                English Dictionary, or The Oxford Dictionary as we have
                now been  requested to  call it, was not  completed until
                1928.  So long as this incomparable editorial instrument
                was in  process  of  publication  editors  naturally did  not
                take it sufficiently seriously or consulted it half-heartedly.
                They tended, for  example, to seek help from it only in
                the  last  resort,  instead  of  cultivating the  habit  of  con-
                sulting its  pages  on all sorts  of  passages which  seem at
                first  sight to be perfectly plain.
                        If thou hast nature in thee bear it not,
                says the  Ghost  to  Hamlet;  and  what  could  be  more
                palpable or straightforward?  Yet the discovery that the
                simple-looMng  word  'nature'  may  mean  'natural
                feeling,'  and  consequently  'filial  affection,'  illuminates
                not  only this line  but  four  other  passages in the  play*
                                                     1
                which have hitherto been misapprehended .  Editors too
                1                      2  Z2
                  v. notes 4.5.161-63;  5* « 9  and cf.  1. z.  1025 3. a. 396.
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45