Page 16 - Jurnal Pendidikan Tingkatan Enam 2019 - Jilid 3
P. 16

Perubahan Paradigma Pemikiran Ke Arah Pendidikan Berkualiti


             12   Ar monoatom                                X    /    X    X     X
                                                                                       D
             13   Weakest van der Waals forces               /    /    X     /    X
             14   Points Orderly arranged                    /    /    X    X     /
                               Total score                   9    13   4    3     7


            Hint:
                        Students are able to write points of elaborations accurately
                        Students unable to write the points elaboration accurately


                                                                     Source: Field Study 2019


            Students' answers in the pre-test were reviewed and analysed in detail. Based on Table
            5.7, generally there are four trends in this melting point graph named as A, B, C and D.
            Student should be able to recognise the trends in order to explain them. The researcher
            set 13 points of elaboration to explain the trend. The 14th point is ‘orderly arranged the
            elaborations’ to ensure that the students can write all the points in a structured manner.
            The cross (X) indicates that the student did not write the points of elaboration or used a
            wrong term. The analysis shows that most students were unable to identify and detect
            the points of elaboration on trend correctly. Only one student (student 2) had successfully
            written 12 points of elaborations correctly. Two students were able to at least get half of
            the elaborations correctly whereas two other students showed poor mastery of the points
            of elaborations.


            The  pre-test  implies that  to  an extent,  the  teaching and  learning process has helped
            students to achieve the learning objective. From this analysis, the researcher was able to
            clearly identify the cause of the problem and has divided the causes of the problem into
            two major parts which are:
               i)  Students were unable to  recognise points of  elaborations and gave the  wrong
                   points of elaborations.
               ii)  Students were unable to correlate points of elaborations in a structured manner
                   thus indicating lack of understanding of the existing trends.


            Student 2 was also found to have scored the highest mark while the other students scored
            marks below than 10. This indicates that there was a big gap in scores between the students.
            This was an undesirable situation in class and action must be taken to bridge the existing
            gap. This situation had triggered an idea to implement action research to bridge potential
            gaps among students. The level of achievements of the students can be categorized as
            follows with the scale of the achievement level as shown in Table 5.2.






                                                              Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia  15
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21