Page 217 - Towards_a_New_Malaysia_The_2018_Election_and_Its_6146371_(z-lib.org)
P. 217

202                                                   Hew Wai Weng

                  convinced. During the question and answer session, members of the audience
                  posed challenging questions, asking the speakers about the likelihood of PAS’s
                  winning the federal government or the Selangor state government without
                  working together with non-Muslims and about the alleged UMNO-PAS
                  partnership.
                     PAS ceramah attendees I met evinced di erent levels of support for the
                  Islamist party. Some were hardcore PAS members, some were dissatis ed
                  supporters considering voting for PH, while others were unhappy with the
                  party leadership but still stayed loyal to the party. For an example, during a
                  ceramah, a PAS member told me:

                     … one-third of PAS members in our neighbourhood have left the party and
                     joined Amanah quietly, another one-third are PAS loyalists, while the rest are
                     fence-sitters. If PH can convince the fence-sitters that they could also champion
                     Islamic causes, they might vote PH.… Personally, I prefer Nik Aziz’s approach
                     in upholding Islam; Hadi Awang is a bit too keras [hard-line]. Yet, the party
                     comes  rst to me. I will still campaign for PAS.
                  Another PAS member sitting next to him interrupted to elaborate with an
                  analogy of a classroom: ‘the teacher might be wrong, but the textbook is always
                  correct.… We can criticise the teacher, but we can’t throw away our textbook.
                  PAS is our textbook. PAS is about Islamic struggle that we can’t abandon’
                  ( eldnotes, 29 April 2018).
                     PH  was  well  aware  that  in  order  to capture  Sungai  Ramal,  it  had  to
                  convince Malay fence-sitters who are PAS sympathisers but not loyalists. It
                  realised that it would be di cult to break through PAS control over many
                  mosques and suraus  in Bangi.  erefore, it ran an extensive campaign on
                  social-media platforms such as Facebook and WhatsApp, and also organised
                  many ceramah to engage with voters face-to-face—both strategies PAS used,
                  too. One Amanah online campaign poster, for instance, outlined the party’s
                  commitment to ensure Bangi remained a Bandar Ilmu (knowledge township),
                  Bandar Islam Melayu (Malay Islamic township), and Bandar ‘Amar Makruf
                  Nahi Mungkar’ (township that ‘enjoins good and forbids wrong’). Tajul Ari n,
                  a former academic, PAS member, and ABIM activist, and among the key
                  speakers in many PH ceramah, stated that PH would promote Bangi as Bandar
                  Rahmatan lil-Alamin—an inclusive Islamic township that is a blessing for all.
                   is statement invoked Amanah’s tagline, Islam Rahmatan lil-Alamin, a slogan
                  that simultaneously rea rms its commitment to upholding an Islamic agenda
                  and to promoting social inclusivity. According to Tajul Ari n, as an ‘Islamic
                  township’, Bangi should o er clean and safe residential neighbourhoods, as
                  well as be free from maksiat (vices)—thus, it should not allow development of






                        This content downloaded from 139.80.253.0 on Fri, 06 Nov 2020 04:22:33 UTC
                                   All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222