Page 29 - Vol 7 No 3 July September 2017

PESY: Print ISSN 2231-1394, Online ISSN 2278-795X Vol. 7 No 3

TABLE - I (a)
SCHEFFE’S POST HOC TEST MEAN DIFFERENCES ON AGILITY AMONG THREE
GROUPS
(Scores in Seconds)
G-1 G- 2 G- 3 Mean Confidence
LI-PT LI-PT-AT C G Differences Interval Value
11.90 11.79 0.123 0.651
11.90 13.39 1.49* 0.651
11.79 13.39 1.62* 0.651
* Significant at .05 level of confidence

RESULT OF SCHEFFES POST HOC TEST ON AGILITY
Table I (a) shows the paired mean differences of low intensity plyometric training, low
intensity plyometric training combined with aerobic training and control group on agility. The
paired wise comparisons results as follows. First comparison: Group 1 and 2: The pair wise
mean difference of group 1 and group 2 values 0.123 was higher than the confidential interval
value of 0.651. Hence the first comparison was insignificant. The results of this comparison
clearly proved that both training have produced similar effects on agility. Second comparison:
Group 1 and 3: The pair wise mean difference of group 1 and group 3 values 1.49 was higher
than the confidential interval value of 0.651. Hence the second comparison was significant. The
results of this comparison clearly proved that low intensity plyometric training, have produced
greater improvements on agility than the control group. Third comparison: Group 2 and 3: The
pair wise mean difference of group 2 and group 3 values 1.62 was higher than the confidential
value of 0.651. Hence the third comparison was significant. The results of this comparison clearly
proved that low intensity plyometric training combined with aerobic training have produced
greater improvements on agility than the control group.

DISCUSSION ON FINDINGS
The results of the present study were demonstrated positive effect of selected speed of
school Kabaddi players. This findings support, in line with the result of the above earlier findings.
Ahmed Fadhil Farhan (2014) conducted a study on impact of plyometric training program on
physical performance in girl’s age 12 to 15 years. Thus 6-weeks performing the plyometric
training program can enhance physical performance in experimental group, while generally no
effect was observed on a series of performance tests in a control group of adolescent female using
the usual training program. Michael G, et, al 2006, conducted a study on the effects of a 6-week
plyometric training program on agility. They found that this study shows that plyometric training
can be an effective training technique to improve an athlete’s agility.Young, Warren, Mcdowell,
Mark, Scarlett, Bentley (2001) conducted a study on the effect of agility, plyometric, and sprint
training on the speed, endurance and power of High School Soccer Players. They concluded that
straight speed and agility training methods are specific and produce limited transfer to the other.
These findings have implications for the design of speed and agility training and testing protocols.

CONCLUSIONS
The performance of agility developed in the influences of low intensity plyometric training
combined with aerobic training than the low intensity plyometric training and control group.
Further low intensity plyometric training also produce significant development on agility
than the control group

19