Page 50 - TGfU & Mini Game Flip Book

34 TGfU & MINI GAME

Table 3.4: Hypothesis and Data Analyses

Hypothesis Construct Data Data Analyses
Technique
H : There is no significant difference TGfU, Mean,
0(1)
between TGFU compared to TM TM SDANOVA/ANCOVA
effective in ball control players with the Ball
ball in 5 vs. 5 mini game situations control
before and after interventions among
Indian junior hockey players?
H : There is no significant difference TGfU, TM Mean,
0(2)
TGFU compared to TM model effective Decision SDANOVA/ANCOVA
in decision making (passing, dribbling, making
tackling and scoring) players with the
ball in 5 vs. 5 mini game situations
before and after interventions among
Indian Junior hockey players?
H : There is no significant difference TGfU, Mean,
0(3)
between TGFU compared to TM TM SDANOVA/ANCOVA
effective in skill execution (passing,
Skill
dribbling, tackling and scoring) players execution
with the ball in 5vs 5 mini game
situations before and after
interventions among Indian junior
hockey players
H : There is no significant difference TGfU, Mean,
0 (4)
between TGFU compared to TM TM SDANOVA/ANCOVA
effective in speed of executing hockey Speed
general skill before and after
interventions among Indian junior
hockey players?
H : There is no significant difference TGfU, Mean,
0(5)
between TGFU compared to TM TM SDANOVA/ANCOVA
effective in accuracy of executing hockey Accuracy
general skill before and after
interventions among Indian junior
hockey players?
H : There is no significant difference TGfU, Mean,
0 (6)
TGFU compared to TM effective in TM SDANOVA/ANCOVA
Pulse-rate and cardiovascular fitness Accuracy
(V0 max) before and after interventions
2
among India junior hockey players?