Page 52 - TGfU & Mini Game Flip Book

36 TGfU & MINI GAME

4

RESULTS

4.1 Introductions

Chapter four (4) reports the result of effectiveness TGfU
and TM pedagogical model in term of ball control,
decision making, skill execution in five versus five mini
game play, speed and accuracy executing general hockey
skills, pulse-rate reading as well as cardiovascular
respond among India’s junior hockey before and after
the training interventions.

4.2 Five Versus Five (5 vs. 5) Mini Game Play
The ANOVA test indicated there was no significant
difference between TGfU and the TM training model on
ball control in five-versus-five game play at pretest, F(1,
28) = 1.61, p > 0.05 (TGfU, M/SD: 7.07 ± 6.98, n = 15, and
TM, M/SD: 6.98 ± 4.20, n = 15). However, posttest results
indicated significant difference between TGfU (M/SD:
9.01 ± 8.97) and the TM (M/SD: 3.07 ± 1.09), F(1, 28) =
6.46, p < 0.05. Figures 4.1 and 4.2 indicates the mean and
standard deviation for ball control at pretest and posttest