Page 92 - NAVAL SCIENCE 3 TEXTBOOK
P. 92

I N TER NAT IONA L  LAW AND THE SEA   97

            Aside  from  navigational  constraints  on  naval  and  men:hant   The fisheries problem, then, is real and vital to man)' countries.
         shipping. strict control of the economic zone could  hinder naval   Fair and intelligent agreements, both bilnteral and multilateral, arc
         scientific and occanographic  research. Further. pollution jurisdic-  necessary to satisfy the constal states and the distant-water fishing
         tion  could  be used to  harass  merchant shipping or na\',ll vcssels   nations. Along with these, there will have to be a strict application
         transiting the areil.                                  of conservation measures, and  it is likely that these will  have to be
                                                                entorced by coastal stOltes under international law designed to ben-
         Self-Defense and Fisheries                             efit everyolle.
            In the legal sense, a territorial sea is not a part of the high seas,
                                                                The Continental Shelf and  Seabeds
         even  though  it  is  ill  a physical and geographic sense. The constal
         stnte  exercises  exclusive jmisdiction-sovereignty-in  its territo-  Recent  technological  ad\'ances  permitting  the  exploitation  of
         rial  sens.  In  contrast, it has  only limited preventive  or protective   the resources of the seabed nnd  its subsoil  have become matters of
         jurisdiction  over i.1I1}'  economic  zone  beyond.  This may  include   vital  importance to  many coastal states.  \ Vith  the discovery of oil
         exploration and  exploitntion  rights on  the  continentnl  shelf and   and minerals in the seabed, nations have tended to assert their exclu-
         seabed, fisheries, and self-defense measures.          sive rights for exploration and exploitation of them.  Tn  general, this
            Self-defense  meilsures arc  cnsil}'  understood  from  the  stand-  activit)'  has concentrated  on the cOl1tinenttll  shelt: but  technology
         point of internationnllaw. It is n fundamentnl  right of a sovereign   has ad\'i.lI1ced to the point where exploitation of deep ocean seabeds
         state under the law to take all  the defensive  measures  required  to   is well within the grasp of states with the means to pursue it.
         safeguard  it's existence, not only in  its  territorial sea,  but also on   The Gene\'a COllvention on the Continental Shelf, made effec-
         the high seas. The fact  that a nation takes action against threats to   tive ill  1964, defines COl/til/ental shelf as "the seabed <1l1d  subsoil of
         its security on the sea be}'ond  its territorial jurisdiction docs not   the submarine areas ndjacent to the coast, but be}'ond the territo-
         metln  it is extending its sovereignt}' to that point. The use of force   rial sea, to a depth of200 meters [656 feet I. or be)'ond to where the
         in  this area, howcver,  requires  that  the situntion  definitely be  a   depth of the superjtlcent waters [allows 1 exploitation of the l1<1tU-
         threat to  the acting nation's security, and that the measures taken   ral resources."
         to repel the threat be reasonable.  Before \Vorld \Var II, for instance,   In  the  past, the bed of the sea could  not be occupied b)' an)'
         President Franklin Roosevelt declared a Defensive Sea Area beyond   state, so the rule was that it was as free as the seas above it. In 1945,
         the 3-mile limit and gave orders to sink any Germtln submnrines   howcver,  President  Harry  Truman  proclnimcd  that  the  United
         found in that area. This order w<\s a reasonable measure in view of   States  regnrded  the  naturnl resources  of the  seabed  and  subsoil
         the war in  Europe and the t~lCt that neutral ships had already been   beneath  the high seas contiguolls to  its shores to be subject to its
         sunk by German submarines in these waters.             jurisdiction and control. Since then, the law pertaining to the con-
            There  have  been  more  disputes over  the protection of rights   tinental shelf and seabeds has e\'olved.
         concerning  fisheries  than  over nny other  international  maritime   Science has determined that in  exccss of 100 billion barrels of
         issue  since \'\'orld  \Var 11.  Fish have  been  han'ested from  the sc;.\s   oil  lie under the U.S.  continental shelf: compared  with  21 billion
         since  the dawl1  of history,  providing  humans with  food, income,   in  U.S.  proven  land  reserves.  To  get the  oil OLlt,  American COI11-
         and adventure.  Freedom to fish on the high seas has been a part of   panics hnve  constructed drilling  rigs  or derricks  in  the high seas
         customary international law.  Since \\'orld \Var  II  there has been a   above the seabed. Geologists also claim  that the continental  shelf,
         stead}' increase in fishing activit)' in all the oceans of the world. New   which in some places extends 120 miles Ollt, contains vast quanti-
         fishing fleets with fnctory ships serving as mother ships for dozens   ties of ores.
         of smaller trawlers comb the principal fishing areas of the world. In   Tada)'.  all  countries  with  continental  shelves  are  in  various
         n number of cases these tleets have depleted fish stocks to the point   stages  of exploration  and  exploitation. and  many hav('  been suc-
         where importnnt fisheries hnve been lost to the world, perhaps for-  cessful.  Foremost among  these are Mexico  and  the United States
         ever. Conservation has becon\e a fundamental concern.   in  the Gulf of iViexico; Norway, Scotland, and Britain in the  North
            Though  the  concept  of exclusive  fishing  zones  for  coastal   Sea;  and  the  United  States  off the  California coast.  The oil rig  is
         states  has become fairly well  established,  this  is  not an  answer to   considered all  impediment  to  navigation  on the high seas, so  the
         the present and future needs of the growing world population. The   Continental Shelf Convention specifies  that  a satet)' zone mllst be
         demand for protein is so great tlwt fish resources cannot be allowed   established around stich instaUatiol1s tip to;:1 distance of 500 meters
         to go ullused in  national preserves. Countries engaged in  distnnt-  (1,640 feet), for the mutual protection of shipping and the instaU,\-
         water fishing, including both developed and developing cOllntries,   tion itself.
         look upon fisheries as a primary means of obtaining food and for-  Developing intern<ltionallaw of the sea  now recognizes  that <1
         eign exchange.  It appears logicnl and necessary to allow natioJls to   coastal state exercises sovereign rights over its continental shelf for
         exploit the fisheries of all the sens within prescribed limits.   the purpose of exploring and exploiting its natural  resources. The
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97