Page 63 - Psychology of Wounds and Wound Care in Clinical Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 63

36   Chapter 2.  Pain

           experience. Furthermore, this theory allows for the
             management and shaping of painful experiences due to the
           multi- faceted nature of it (Novy et al.   1995 ). For example, in
           addition to the physiological aspects, it accounts for affective,
           behavioural, cognitive and sensory factors. Building upon the
           theory, Melzack (  1993 ) argued that there was an interrelation
           of physiological and psychological facets, with affective,
           behavioural, cognitive and sensory-physical factors each
           being part of an integrated chronic pain system.
               Although this theory has been subject to specific  criticisms,
           particularly in relation to points of particular anatomical
           mechanisms, and suitably revised, it has been of enormous
           value in pushing forward and stimulating research  surrounding
           the science of pain and the development of new clinical
             treatments (Melzack and Wall   1982 ). Furthermore, the model
           has led to the development of various pain management
             techniques, including that of neurophysiological procedures,
           behavioural treatments, pharmacological advance, and tech-
           niques targeted towards the alteration of attentional and
           perceptual pain associated processes (Novy et al.   1995 ).


               Factors Influencing Pain

             As discussed, pain is not a physiological symptom, but rather, a
                                                     ;
           biopsychosocial phenomenon (Adams et al.   2006  Upton and
           Solowiej   2010 ). Pain, and its experience, is a complex and multi-
           faceted phenomenon, being subjective and often difficult to
           describe. In addition to the pathophysiological causes of wound
           pain, the patient’s psychological state of mind, environment and
           cultural background can each impact on the way in which the
                                         ;
           patient perceives it (Briggs et al.   2002  Soon and Acton  2006 ; see
           Table   2.2 ). Indeed, there are whole ranges of factors that can
           influence whether the gate is open or closed, for example:
           •      The amount of activity in the pain fibres: the greater the
             injury the more active the pain fibres, the more open the
             gate, meaning larger injuries often cause more pain than
             smaller ones.
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68