Page 710 - Clinical Application of Mechanical Ventilation
P. 710
676 Chapter 19
With the presence of PDA revealed by the echocardiogram, an adequate PaO
2
Insufficient PaO 2 may should be provided and maintained in an attempt to minimize an increase of the
cause hypoxemia and an
increase of the PVR. pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Attempts to reduce the F O requirement may
I
2
be successful, but this must be done slowly to prevent the PVR from increasing.
CASE 14: PERSISTENT PULMONARY
HYPERTENSION OF THE NEWBORN
INTRODuCTION
The 5-min Apgar score A 16-year-old primigravida mother gave birth to a 28-week-gestation, 1,130-gm
should show significant
improvement over the one- male infant born without prenatal care. The 1- and 5-min Apgar scores were 3 and
minute score. 5, respectively.
0 1 2 1 min 5 min
Heart rate None Slow Over 100 1 1
Irregular
Respiratory effort Apnea Irregular shallow Yelling, 1 1
Gasping crying
Muscle tone Flaccid Some flexion of Well-flexed 0 1
extremities
Reflex No response Grimace Crying 0 1
to stimulus
Color Pale blue Blue extremities Pink all over 1 1
Body pink
Total 3 5
© Cengage Learning 2014
Despite an Apgar score of 5 at 5 min, the cardiopulmonary status of the infant
continued to deteriorate and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) became neces-
Peripheral perfusion
status is a gross indicator sary. CPR was started using 100% oxygen via a flow-inflating resuscitation bag
of cardiac output or tissue
perfusion. with pressure manometer attached. The infant was subsequently intubated with a
2.5 mm endotracheal tube, stabilized and placed on pressure-controlled ventila-
tion without further complications.
An umbilical artery catheter (UAC) was inserted and secured. After a period
of stabilization on the ventilator, the infant still appeared dusky. His capillary refill
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

