Page 531 - Cardiac Nursing

g
P
qxd
0
009
9/2
9/0
10.
10.
8:2
p46
8 A
0-5
P
M
K34
0-c
21_
K34
LWB K34 0-c 21_ p46 0-5 10. qxd 0 9/0 9/2 009 0 0 8:2 8 A M P a a g e 5 07 Apt ara
L L LWB
LWBK340-c21_21_p460-510.qxd 09/09/2009 08:28 AM Page 507 Aptara
07
Apt
e 5
07
ara
C HAPTER 21 / Hemodynamic Monitoring 507
374. Fontes, M. L., Bellows, W., Ngo, L., et al. (1999). Assessment of ventricu- 397. Peacock, W. I., Albert, N. M., Kies, P., et al. (2000). Bioimpedance mon-
lar function in critically ill patients: Limitations of pulmonary artery itoring: Better than chest x-ray for predicting abnormal pulmonary fluid?
catheterization. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 13, Congestive Heart Failure, 6, 86–89.
6
6
521–527. 398. Cotter, G., Moshkovitz, Y., Kaluski, E., et al. (2003). The role of cardiac
375. Jaeggi, P., Hofer, C. K., Klaghofer, R., et al. (2003). Measurement of power and systemic vascular resistance in the pathophysiology and diag-
cardiac output after cardiac surgery by a new transesophageal nosis of patients with acute congestive heart failure. European Journal of
7
7
Doppler device. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 17, Heart Failure, 5, 443–451.
217–220. 399. Drazner, M. H., Thompson, B., Rosenberg, P. B., et al. (2002). Com-
376. Dark, P. M., & Singer, M. (2004). The validity of trans-esophageal parison of impedance cardiography with invasive hemodynamic meas-
Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill urements in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or nonis-
adults. Intensive Care Medicine, 30, 2060–2066. chemic cardiomyopathy. American Journal of Cardiology, 89, 993–995.
377. Sharma, J., Bhise, M., Singh, A., et al. (2005). Hemodynamic measure- 400. Samejima, H., Omiya, K., Uno, M., et al. (2003). Relationship between
ments after cardiac surgery: Transesophageal Doppler versus pulmonary ar- impaired chronotropic response, cardiac output during exercise, and ex-
tery catheter. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 19, ercise tolerance in patients with chronic heart failure. Japanese Heart
4
4
746–750. Journal, 44, 515–525.
W
W
378. Feissel, M., Michard, F., Faller, J. P., et al. (2004). The respiratory varia- 401. Weiss, S. J., Ernst, A. A., Godorov, G., et al. (2003). Bioimpedance-derived
tion in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive differences in cardiac physiology during exercise stress testing in low-risk
6
Care Medicine, 30, 1834–1837. chest pain patients. Southern Medical Journal, 96, 1121–1127.
6
379. Feissel, M., Michard, F., Mangin, I., et al. (2001). Respiratory changes in 402. Folan, L., & Funk, M. (2008). Measurement of thoracic fluid content in
aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated heart failure: The role of impedance cardiography. AACN Advanced Crit-
patients with septic shock. Chest, 119, 867–873. ical Care, 19, 47–55.
380. Peterson, G. E., Brickner, M. E., & Reimold, S. C. (2003). Trans- 403.Summers, H. R., Woodward, L. H., Thompson, J. R., et al. (2008). Im-
esophageal echocardiography: Clinical indications and applications. Cir- pedance cardiographic waveform changes in response to treatment of
4
4
culation, 107, 2398–2402. acute heart failure: A case study. Congestive Heart Failure, 14, 157–160.
7
7
381. Squara, P., Denjean, D., Estagnasie, P., et al. (2007). Noninvasive cardiac 404. Summers, R. L., Parrott, C. W., Quale, C., et al. (2004). Use of nonin-
output monitoring (NICOM): A clinical validation. Intensive Care Med- vasive hemodynamics to aid decision making in the initiation and titra-
icine, 33, 1191–1194. tion of neurohormonal agents. Congestive Heart Failure, 10, 28–31.
382. Raval, N. Y., Squara, P., Cleman, M., et al. (2008). Multicenter evalua- 405. Taler, S. J., Textor, S. C., & Augustine, J. E. (2002). Resistant hyperten-
tion of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance tech- sion: Comparing hemodynamic management to specialist care. Hyper-
nique. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 22, 113–119. tension, 39, 982–988.
383. Moshkovitz, Y., Kaluski, E., Milo, O., et al. (2004). Recent develop- 406. Parry, M. J., & McFetridge-Durdle, J. (2006). Ambulatory impedance
ments in cardiac output determination by bioimpedance: Comparison cardiography: A systematic review. Nursing Research, 55, 283–291.
with invasive cardiac output and potential cardiovascular applications. 407. McFetridge-Durdle, J., Routledge, F., Parry, M., et al. (2008). Ambula-
Current Opinion in Cardiology, 19, 229–237. tory impedance cardiography in hypertension: A validation study. Euro-
7
384. Albert, N. M. (2006). Bioimpedance cardiography measurements of car- pean Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 7, 204–213.
7
diac output and other cardiovascular parameters. Critical Care Nursing 408. Braun, M. U., Schnabel, A., Rauwolf, T., et al. (2005). Impedance car-
Clinics of North America, 18, 195–202. diography as a noninvasive technique for atrioventricular interval opti-
385. Cotter, G., Moshkovitz, Y., Kaluski, E., et al. (2004). Accurate, noninva- mization in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Journal of Interventional
sive continuous monitoring of cardiac output by whole-body electrical Cardiac Electrophysiology, 13, 223–229.
bioimpedance. Chest, 125, 1431–1440. 409. Heinroth, K. M., Elster, M., Nuding, S., et al. (2007). Impedance car-
386. Brown, C. V., Martin, M. J., Shoemaker, W. C., et al. (2005). The effect diography: A useful and reliable tool in optimization of cardiac resyn-
of obesity on bioimpedance cardiac index. American Journal of Surgery, chronization devices. Europace, 9, 744–750.
189, 547–550. 410. Belott, P. (1999). Bioimpedance in the pacemaker clinic. AACN Clinical
387. Raaijmakers, E., Faes, T. J., Scholten, R. J., et al. (1999). A meta-analysis Issues, 10, 414–418.
of three decades of validating thoracic impedance cardiography. Critical 411. Shoemaker, W. C., Wo, C. C., Yu, S., et al. (2000). Invasive and nonin-
7
Care Medicine, 27, 1203–1213. vasive haemodynamic monitoring of acutely ill sepsis and septic shock
7
388. Van De Water, J. M., Miller, T. W., Vogel, R. L., et al. (2003). Impedance patients in the emergency department. European Journal of Emergency
7
cardiography: The next vital sign technology? Chest, 123, 2028–2033. Medicine, 7, 169–175.
7
389. Suttner, S., Schollhorn, T., Boldt, J., et al. (2006). Noninvasive assessment 412. Shoemaker, W. C., Wo, C. C., Chan, L., et al. (2001). Outcome predic-
of cardiac output using thoracic electrical bioimpedance in hemodynami- tion of emergency patients by noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring.
cally stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery: A comparison with Chest, 120, 528–537.
pulmonary artery thermodilution. Intensive Care Medicine, 32, 2053–2058. 413. Shoemaker, W. C., Wo, C. C., Chien, L. C., et al. (2006). Evaluation of
390. Kaukinen, S., Koobi, T., Bi, Y., et al. (2003). Cardiac output measure- invasive and noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in trauma patients.
ment after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, Journal of Trauma, 61, 844–853.
continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography. 414. Shoemaker, W. C., Wo, C. C., Lu, K., et al. (2006). Noninvasive hemody-
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 17, 199–203. namic monitoring for combat casualties. Military Medicine, 171, 813–820.
7
7
391. Engoren, M., & Barbee, D. (2005). Comparison of cardiac output de- 415. Shoemaker, W. C., Wo, C. C., Lu, K., et al. (2006). Outcome prediction
termined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method. Amer- by a mathematical model based on noninvasive hemodynamic monitor-
ican Journal of Critical Care, 14, 40–45. ing. Journal of Trauma, 60, 82–90.
4
4
392. de Waal, E. E., Konings, M. K., Kalkman, C. J., et al. (2008). Assessment 416. Adams, K. F., Jr., Fonarow, G. C., Emerman, C. L., et al. (2005). Char-
of stroke volume index with three different bioimpedance algorithms: acteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the
Lack of agreement compared to thermodilution. Intensive Care Medicine, United States: Rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the
4
4
34, 735–739. first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National
393. Stout, C. L., Van de Water, J. M., Thompson, W. M., et al. (2006). Im- Registry (ADHERE). American Heart Journal, 149, 209–216.
pedance cardiography: Can it replace thermodilution and the pulmonary 417. Nieminen, M. S., Brutsaert, D., Dickstein, K., et al. (2006). EuroHeart
artery catheter? American Surgery, 72, 728–732. Failure Survey II (EHFS II): A survey on hospitalized acute heart failure pa-
7
394. Lasater, M., & Von Rueden, K. T. (2003). Outpatient cardiovascular tients: Description of population. European Heart Journal, 27, 2725–2736.
7
management utilizing impedance cardiography. AACN Clinical Issues, 418. Cotter, G., Felker, G. M., Adams, K. F., et al. (2008). The pathophysiol-
4
4
14, 240–250. ogy of acute heart failure—Is it all about fluid accumulation? American
395. Albert, N. M. (2006). Bioimpedance to prevent heart failure hospitaliza- Heart Journal, 155, 9–18.
tion. Current Heart Failure Report, 3, 136–142. 419. Yu, C. M., Wang, L., Chau, E., et al. (2005). Intrathoracic impedance
396. Milzman, D. P., Hogan, C., Han, C., et al. (1997). Continuous, nonin- monitoring in patients with heart failure: Correlation with fluid status
vasive cardiac output monitoring quantified acute congestive heart fail- and feasibility of early warning preceding hospitalization. Circulation,
ure in the ED. Critical Care Medicine, 25, 17. 112, 841–848.